|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 206, 253-260, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
I Vizcaino, D Salas, JS Vilar, F Ruiz-Perales, C Herranz and J Ibanez
Department of Radiology, University Hospital Dr Peset, Valencia, Spain.
PURPOSE: To analyze the results of round 1 of the population-based Valencia Breast Cancer Screening Program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this program, 78,224 (72.98%) of the 107,178 women invited (aged 45-65 years) underwent screening. Complementary views were obtained in 5,771 women (7.38%). Among the total population studied, 3,502 (4.48%) underwent short-term mammographic follow-up studies; 3,898 (4.98%) underwent additional studies and treatment at hospitals. Five hundred eighty-seven women (0.75%) underwent biopsy. RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 334 patients (4.27 cancers per 1,000 women [3.24 per 1,000 women aged 45-49 years, 6.30 per 1,000 women aged 60-65 years]; six patients with lobular carcinoma in situ excluded). The estimated sensitivity was 89%; specificity, 99%. The positive predictive value of mammography was 8.56%; of mammography with additional examinations, 26.82%; and of biopsy, 56.89%. Forty-one patients (12.28%) had ductal carcinoma in situ; 284 (85.03%) had infiltrating carcinoma. In 73 (25.70%) of the 284 patients, infiltrating carcinomas were smaller than 1 cm. Two hundred twenty-five patients (76.27%) had no lymph node involvement. One hundred seventy-nine (61.09%) had stage 0 or 1 cancer. CONCLUSION: Results are consistent with other published results; differences are due to methods and patient population characteristics.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. H. Shin, B.-K. Han, Y. H. Choe, S.-J. Nam, W. Park, and Y.-H. Im Ultrasonographic Detection of Occult Cancer in Patients After Surgical Therapy for Breast Cancer J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2005; 24(5): 643 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Elmore, C. Y. Nakano, T. D. Koepsell, L. M. Desnick, C. J. D'Orsi, and D. F. Ransohoff International Variation in Screening Mammography Interpretations in Community-Based Programs J Natl Cancer Inst, September 17, 2003; 95(18): 1384 - 1393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Crystal, S. D. Strano, S. Shcharynski, and M. J. Koretz Using Sonography to Screen Women with Mammographically Dense Breasts Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2003; 181(1): 177 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Vizcaíno, L. Gadea, L. Andreo, D. Salas, F. Ruiz-Perales, D. Cuevas, C. Herranz, and F. Bueno Short-term Follow-up Results in 795 Nonpalpable Probably Benign Lesions Detected at Screening Mammography Radiology, May 1, 2001; 219(2): 475 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Kaplan Clinical Utility of Bilateral Whole-Breast US in the Evaluation of Women with Dense Breast Tissue Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 641 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |