Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vizcaino, I.
Right arrow Articles by Ibanez, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vizcaino, I.
Right arrow Articles by Ibanez, J.

Radiology, Vol 206, 253-260, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Breast cancer screening: first round in the population-based program in Valencia, Spain. Collaborative Group of Readers of the Breast Cancer Screening Program of the Valencia Community

I Vizcaino, D Salas, JS Vilar, F Ruiz-Perales, C Herranz and J Ibanez
Department of Radiology, University Hospital Dr Peset, Valencia, Spain.

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of round 1 of the population-based Valencia Breast Cancer Screening Program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this program, 78,224 (72.98%) of the 107,178 women invited (aged 45-65 years) underwent screening. Complementary views were obtained in 5,771 women (7.38%). Among the total population studied, 3,502 (4.48%) underwent short-term mammographic follow-up studies; 3,898 (4.98%) underwent additional studies and treatment at hospitals. Five hundred eighty-seven women (0.75%) underwent biopsy. RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 334 patients (4.27 cancers per 1,000 women [3.24 per 1,000 women aged 45-49 years, 6.30 per 1,000 women aged 60-65 years]; six patients with lobular carcinoma in situ excluded). The estimated sensitivity was 89%; specificity, 99%. The positive predictive value of mammography was 8.56%; of mammography with additional examinations, 26.82%; and of biopsy, 56.89%. Forty-one patients (12.28%) had ductal carcinoma in situ; 284 (85.03%) had infiltrating carcinoma. In 73 (25.70%) of the 284 patients, infiltrating carcinomas were smaller than 1 cm. Two hundred twenty-five patients (76.27%) had no lymph node involvement. One hundred seventy-nine (61.09%) had stage 0 or 1 cancer. CONCLUSION: Results are consistent with other published results; differences are due to methods and patient population characteristics.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. H. Shin, B.-K. Han, Y. H. Choe, S.-J. Nam, W. Park, and Y.-H. Im
Ultrasonographic Detection of Occult Cancer in Patients After Surgical Therapy for Breast Cancer
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2005; 24(5): 643 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. G. Elmore, C. Y. Nakano, T. D. Koepsell, L. M. Desnick, C. J. D'Orsi, and D. F. Ransohoff
International Variation in Screening Mammography Interpretations in Community-Based Programs
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 17, 2003; 95(18): 1384 - 1393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Crystal, S. D. Strano, S. Shcharynski, and M. J. Koretz
Using Sonography to Screen Women with Mammographically Dense Breasts
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2003; 181(1): 177 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
I. Vizcaíno, L. Gadea, L. Andreo, D. Salas, F. Ruiz-Perales, D. Cuevas, C. Herranz, and F. Bueno
Short-term Follow-up Results in 795 Nonpalpable Probably Benign Lesions Detected at Screening Mammography
Radiology, May 1, 2001; 219(2): 475 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. S. Kaplan
Clinical Utility of Bilateral Whole-Breast US in the Evaluation of Women with Dense Breast Tissue
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 641 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.