Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by van Holsbeeck, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by van Holsbeeck, M. T.

Radiology, Vol 206, 45-48, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Wooden foreign bodies in soft tissue: detection at US

JA Jacobson, A Powell, JG Craig, JA Bouffard and MT van Holsbeeck
Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of ultrasound (US) for detection of wooden foreign bodies implanted in cadaveric specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Wooden foreign bodies were randomly placed in the plantar soft tissues of three cadaver feet by using 5-mm-long incisions. Ten foreign bodies were 2.5 x 1.0 mm (length x diameter); 10 were 5.0 x 1.0 mm. Ten incisions were performed without implantation of foreign bodies. Three musculoskeletal radiologists independently performed US in blinded fashion and recorded the presence of a foreign body. Each used 7.5- and 10-MHz linear-array transducers and was informed of the possible presence of a foreign body. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity for detection of 2.5-mm-long foreign bodies were 86.7% and 96.7%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of 5.0-mm-long foreign bodies were 93.3% and 96.7%, respectively. Overall sensitivity was 90.0%, with specificity of 96.7%, accuracy of 92.3%, positive predictive value of 98.0%, and negative predictive value of 83.0%. CONCLUSION: US can be used effectively to locate wooden foreign bodies as small as 2.5 mm in length. Given that many foreign bodies are radiographically undetectable, the accuracy and availability of US make it an excellent modality for evaluation of radiolucent foreign bodies.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Asad, K. Bae, K.-N. Jeon, J.-M. Cho, T.-B. Shin, Y.-T. Joo, and H.-J. Kim
Appendicitis Caused by a Foreign Body of Dental Origin: Diagnosis With Ultrasonography
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2007; 26(7): 967 - 970.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. L. Isaacs
Detection of a Ballpoint Pen in a Patient's Abdomen by Sonography.
J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2006; 25(8): 1095 - 1098.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
T. S. Gibbs
The Use of Sonography in the Identification, Localization, and Removal of Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, January 1, 2006; 22(1): 5 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
K. C. Davae, C. M. Sofka, E. DiCarlo, and R. S. Adler
Value of Power Doppler Imaging and the Hypoechoic Halo in the Sonographic Detection of Foreign Bodies: Correlation With Histopathologic Findings
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2003; 22(12): 1309 - 1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Soudack, A. Nachtigal, and D. Gaitini
Clinically Unsuspected Foreign Bodies: The Importance of Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2003; 22(12): 1381 - 1385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. P. Fessell, D. A. Jamadar, J. A. Jacobson, E. M. Caoili, Q. Dong, S. S. Pai, and M. T. van Holsbeeck
Sonography of Dorsal Ankle and Foot Abnormalities
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1573 - 1581.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. Moschilla and W. Breidahl
Sonography of the Finger
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1451 - 1457.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
T. D. Boyse, D. P. Fessell, J. A. Jacobson, J. Lin, M. T. van Holsbeeck, and C. W. Hayes
US of Soft-Tissue Foreign Bodies and Associated Complications with Surgical Correlation
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2001; 21(5): 1251 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. K. Horton, J. A. Jacobson, A. Powell, D. P. Fessell, and C. W. Hayes
Sonography and Radiography of Soft-Tissue Foreign Bodies
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1155 - 1159.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Lin, J. A. Jacobson, D. P. Fessell, W. J. Weadock, and C. W. Hayes
An Illustrated Tutorial of Musculoskeletal Sonography: Part 4, Musculoskeletal Masses, Sonographically Guided Interventions, and Miscellaneous Topics
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1711 - 1719.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.