Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tourassi, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tourassi, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, R. E.

Radiology, Vol 206, 81-88, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Acute pulmonary embolism: cost-effectiveness analysis of the effect of artificial neural networks on patient care

GD Tourassi, CE Floyd and RE Coleman
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Louisville Hospital, Kentucky, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of artificial neural networks for diagnosis in patients suspected of having acute pulmonary embolism who are typically referred for pulmonary angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four diagnostic strategies were explored to help define the diagnostic role of neural networks in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism in whom nondiagnostic ventilation-perfusion lung scans were obtained. First, a network was used to determine which patients could be directly referred for treatment without angiography. Second, the network was applied to determine in which patients treatment could be withheld. Third, the network was used to distinguish patients in whom the network gave indeterminate responses and who should proceed to angiography. Each strategy was compared with use of angiography in terms of morbidity, mortality, and cost per life saved. RESULTS: The use of the neural network reduced the average cost per patient by more than one-half relative to the cost of angiography. Morbidity and mortality rates were also comparable to or lower than those associated with angiography. The results were consistent regardless of the prevalence of disease. CONCLUSION: The use of neural networks in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism is a promising way to improve cost-effectiveness in the care of patients with nondiagnostic lung scans.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOSTHome page
O. N. Hatipoglu, E. Hanci, E. Tabakoglu, G. Altiay, T. F. Cermik, and T. Caglar
A New Clinical Model in Pulmonary Embolism and Its Correlation With V/P Scan Results
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, July 1, 2006; 12(3): 344 - 351.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.