Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Irie, H.
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Irie, H.
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, K.

Radiology, Vol 206, 379-387, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Optimal MR cholangiopancreatographic sequence and its clinical application

H Irie, H Honda, T Tajima, T Kuroiwa, K Yoshimitsu, K Makisumi and K Masuda
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

PURPOSE: To determine the appropriate acquisition parameters for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with a half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) sequence; to determine the optimal MRCP technique by comparing half-Fourier RARE, steady-state free precession (SSFP) two-dimensional (2D) fast spin-echo (SE), and three-dimensional (3D) fast SE sequences; and to clarify the usefulness and limitations of MRCP in diagnosing pancreatic abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Half-Fourier RARE MRCP images with varying parameters were compared by using a phantom. Duct conspicuity and contrast-to-noise ratios (C/Ns) were compared for the four MRCP techniques in a phantom and healthy volunteers. The optimal MRCP technique was used to study healthy volunteers and clinical cases. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created for data analysis. RESULTS: A 5-mm-thick section without intersection gap was appropriate for half-Fourier RARE MRCP. Only half-Fourier RARE MRCP could depict a 1-mm duct. C/N was the highest with half-Fourier RARE, followed by 3D fast SE, 2D fast SE, and SSFP sequences. ROC curve analysis revealed no interobserver differences, and the area under the curve for detection of strictures of the main pancreatic duct was as high as 0.89. CONCLUSION: Half-Fourier RARE MRCP has the highest contrast and spatial resolution among the four techniques studied and may play an important role in diagnosing pancreatic abnormalities.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Tamura, T. Ishibashi, and S. Takahashi
Chronic Pancreatitis: MRCP versus ERCP for Quantitative Caliber Measurement and Qualitative Evaluation
Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 920 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Sodickson, K. J. Mortele, M. A. Barish, K. H. Zou, S. Thibodeau, and C. M. C. Tempany
Three-dimensional Fast-Recovery Fast Spin-Echo MRCP: Comparison with Two-dimensional Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo Techniques
Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 549 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. V. Sahani, R. Kadavigere, M. Blake, C. Fernandez-del Castillo, G. Y. Lauwers, and P. F. Hahn
Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of Pancreas: Multi-Detector Row CT with 2D Curved Reformations--Correlation with MRCP
Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 560 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Haradome, T. Ichikawa, H. Sou, T. Yoshikawa, A. Nakamura, T. Araki, and J. Hachiya
The Pearl Necklace Sign: An Imaging Sign of Adenomyomatosis of the Gallbladder at MR Cholangiopancreatography
Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 80 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. K. Kim, B. S. Kim, J. H. Kim, H. K. Ha, P. N. Kim, A. Y. Kim, and M.-G. Lee
Diagnosis of Intrahepatic Stones: Superiority of MR Cholangiopancreatography over Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 429 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. C. Carlos, H. K. Hussain, J. H. Song, and I. R. Francis
Gadolinium-Ethoxybenzyl-Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid as an Intrabiliary Contrast Agent: Preliminary Assessment
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2002; 179(1): 87 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Kondo, M. Kanematsu, Y. Shiratori, K. Itoh, T. Murakami, M. Hori, I. Yasuda, M. Matsuo, H. Nakamura, H. Hoshi, et al.
MR Cholangiography with Volume Rendering: Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis in Patients with Choledocholithiasis
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1183 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. Irie, H. Honda, T. Kuroiwa, K. Yoshimitsu, H. Aibe, K. Shinozaki, and K. Masuda
Pitfalls in MR Cholangiopancreatographic Interpretation
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2001; 21(1): 23 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. A. Soto, O. Alvarez, F. Munera, S. M. Velez, J. Valencia, and N. Ramirez
Diagnosing Bile Duct Stones: Comparison of Unenhanced Helical CT, Oral Contrast-Enhanced CT Cholangiography, and MR Cholangiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1127 - 1134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. M. Vitellas, M. T. Keogan, C. E. Spritzer, and R. C. Nelson
MR Cholangiopancreatography of Bile and Pancreatic Duct Abnormalities with Emphasis on the Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo Technique
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2000; 20(4): 939 - 957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Soto, M. A. Barish, O. Alvarez, and S. Medina
Detection of Choledocholithiasis with MR Cholangiography: Comparison of Three-dimensional Fast Spin-Echo and Single- and Multisection Half-Fourier Rapid Acquisition with Relaxation Enhancement Sequences
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 737 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Irie, H. Honda, H. Aibe, T. Kuroiwa, K. Yoshimitsu, K. Shinozaki, K. Yamaguchi, M. Shimada, and K. Masuda
MR Cholangiopancreatographic Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Intraductal Mucin- Producing Tumors of the Pancreas
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1403 - 1408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. S. Fulcher, M. A. Turner, K. J. Franklin, M. L. Shiffman, R. K. Sterling, V. A. C. Luketic, and A. J. Sanyal
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Evaluation with MR Cholangiography-A Case-Control Study
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 71 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. A. Soto, O. Alvarez, J. E. Lopera, F. Munera, J. C. Restrepo, and G. Correa
Biliary Obstruction: Findings at MR Cholangiography and Cross-sectional MR Imaging
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2000; 20(2): 353 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. R. Margulis and J. H. Sunshine
Radiology at the Turn of the Millennium1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 15 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. S. Fulcher and M. A. Turner
MR Pancreatography: A Useful Tool for Evaluating Pancreatic Disorders
RadioGraphics, January 1, 1999; 19(1): 5 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. S. Fulcher, M. A. Turner, and G. W. Capps
MR Cholangiography: Technical Advances and Clinical Applications
RadioGraphics, January 1, 1999; 19(1): 25 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Fukukura, F. Fujiyoshi, M. Sasaki, and M. Nakajo
Pancreatic Duct: Morphologic Evaluation with MR Cholangiopancreatography after Secretin Stimulation
Radiology, March 1, 2002; 222(3): 674 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.