|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 206, 429-435, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
SG Silverman, TE Deuson, N Kane, DF Adams, SE Seltzer, MD Phillips, R Khorasani, MJ Zinner and BL Holman
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
PURPOSE: To determine the difference in cost to providers of percutaneous abdominal biopsy as the first strategy versus surgical biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cost of tissue diagnosis determination with percutaneous biopsy as the first strategy in 439 patients with an abdominal mass was estimated. Costs included direct hospital costs and professional costs of initial and repeat biopsy, follow-up imaging and clinic visits, surgical biopsy (when needed), and treatment of complications. The sum of these costs was compared with the estimated cost had the same patients undergone surgical biopsy instead, with no complications or need for follow-up or repeat biopsy. RESULTS: The total estimated cost of percutaneous biopsy as the first strategy ($543,245) was less than the cost had surgical biopsy been used alone ($1,919,867). The average per patient direct hospital cost of percutaneous biopsy ($800) was lower than that of surgical biopsy ($3,419). The average per patient professional cost of percutaneous biopsy ($438) was also lower than that of surgical biopsy ($955). Savings averaged $3,136 per patient, or $1,376,622 for the study period. CONCLUSION: Substantial health care cost savings may result by using a diagnostic algorithm in which percutaneous biopsy is the first strategy for establishment of a diagnosis in patients suspected of having abdominal malignancy.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. E. Heilbrun, R. J. Zagoria, A. J. Garvin, M. C. Hall, K. Krehbiel, A. Southwick, and P. E. Clark CT-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Renal Tumors Before Treatment with Percutaneous Ablation Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1500 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Silverman, Y. U. Gan, K. J. Mortele, K. Tuncali, and E. S. Cibas Renal Masses in the Adult Patient: The Role of Percutaneous Biopsy Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 6 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Medina, E. Aguirre, B. Bernal, and N. R. Altman Functional MR Imaging versus Wada Test for Evaluation of Language Lateralization: Cost Analysis Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 49 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-S. Jung, J.-D. Huh, S. U. Lee, B. H. Han, H.-K. Chang, and Y. D. Cho Bile Duct: Analysis of Percutaneous Transluminal Forceps Biopsy in 130 Patients Suspected of Having Malignant Biliary Obstruction Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 725 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Cohen Determining Costs of Imaging Services Radiology, September 1, 2001; 220(3): 563 - 565. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Salomonowitz MR Imaging-Guided Biopsy and Therapeutic Intervention in a Closed-Configuration Magnet: Single-Center Series of 361 Punctures Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2001; 177(1): 159 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Rubin, M. D. Armerding, M. D. Dake, and S. Napel Cost Identification of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Imaging by Using Time and Motion Analyses Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 63 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |