Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mussurakis, S.
Right arrow Articles by Horsman, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mussurakis, S.
Right arrow Articles by Horsman, A.

Radiology, Vol 206, 465-473, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images

S Mussurakis, P Gibbs and A Horsman
Centre for MR Investigations, University of Hull, England.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a region-of-interest (ROI) analytic method that involves selective sampling of pixels within predetermined ranges of contrast material enhancement values ("thresholding") on magnetic resonance (MR) images of primary breast abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images were obtained in 105 women. ROIs were drawn to outline the full extent of lesions. Relative signal intensity increase was determined on a pixel-by-pixel basis on 1- and 2-minute postcontrast images, as was the maximum relative signal intensity increase. Thresholding was used to analyze each ROI, with the upper boundary defined by the highest pixel value and lower boundaries of 0%-100%. RESULTS: Seventy-one invasive carcinomas and 37 benign lesions were analyzed. Narrower thresholding (i.e., larger percentage) resulted in an increase in all enhancement ratios (P < .0005). The enhancement ratio on 1-minute postcontrast images differed between benign lesions and carcinomas (P < .0005), but there were no significant differences in 2-minute and maximum ratios. Mean enhancement differences between benign and malignant lesions increased with narrower thresholding, but variability also increased linearly. Results of receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that thresholding did not affect the diagnostic usefulness of enhancement ratios. CONCLUSION: Contrary to current opinion, selective sampling of the most enhancing areas of breast abnormalities may not provide any diagnostic advantage over the use of easily drawn, lesion-encompassing ROIs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Thukral, D. M. Thomasson, C. K. Chow, R. Eulate, S. B. Wedam, S. N. Gupta, B. J. Wise, S. M. Steinberg, D. J. Liewehr, P. L. Choyke, et al.
Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR in Patients Receiving Bevacizumab Initial Experience
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 727 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. C. Williams, W. B. DeMartini, S. C. Partridge, S. Peacock, and C. D. Lehman
Breast MR Imaging: Computer-aided Evaluation Program for Discriminating Benign from Malignant Lesions
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 94 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl, H. H. Schild, and N. Morakkabati
Dynamic Bilateral Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of the Breast: Trade-off between Spatial and Temporal Resolution
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 789 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. A. Kaiser and B. L. Daniel
Dynamic Spiral MR Mammography Dr Daniel responds:
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 919 - 920.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.