Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pham, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Wallner, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pham, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Wallner, P. E.

Radiology, Vol 206, 525-531, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Changes in high-dose-rate tandem and ovoid applicator positions during treatment in an unfixed brachytherapy system

HT Pham, Y Chen, E Rouby, RA Lustig and PE Wallner
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, NJ, USA.

PURPOSE: To measure the change in applicator position during treatment in an unfixed high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy system and to evaluate the effect of the shifts on dose calculations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Posttreatment localization radiographs were obtained for 47 HDR treatments (26 tandem and ovoid applicators, 21 ovoids-only applicators). The authors measured the change in applicator position relative to the patient's bone anatomy. Doses to the target and critical structures were calculated for posttreatment applicator positions for comparison. RESULTS: Average displacements of the tandem and ovoid applicators in anteroposterior dimension were 5 and 4 mm for the tandem and ovoids, respectively. Anterior displacement occurred twice as often as posterior displacement. The average lateral and longitudinal shifts were less. Less displacement was observed with ovoids-only insertions. The largest displacement for ovoids-only applicators was 3 mm in the anteroposterior dimension. A high bladder dose difference (17.4%) for tandem and ovoid applications correlated with anterior shifts of the applicators. CONCLUSION: Patient movement in an unfixed HDR brachytherapy system can displace the applicators, especially the tandem. Anterior shifts correlate with high bladder dose differences. Immobilization of the patient's hips and legs, as well as stabilization of applicators, would reduce these shifts.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
T. B. Hunter and M. S. Taljanovic
Medical Devices of the Abdomen and Pelvis
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2005; 25(2): 503 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.