Radiology, Vol 206, 737-744, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Gamekeeper thumb: comparison of MR arthrography with conventional arthrography and MR imaging in cadavers

JM Ahn, DJ Sartoris, HS Kang, MJ Botte, D Trudell, P Haghighi and D Resnick
Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.

PURPOSE: To compare magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography with conventional arthrography and standard MR imaging in the evaluation of gamekeeper thumb. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen cadaveric thumbs with (n = 12) or without (n = 6) experimental abduction stress were examined with conventional arthrography, standard MR imaging, and MR arthrography. Standard MR imaging and MR arthrography were performed with 0.2-T (low-field-strength) extremity-only and 1.5-T (high-field- strength) magnets. Results of blinded imaging analyses were correlated with pathologic findings. Paired MR images and MR arthrograms were rated with a three-point scale. RESULTS: Fourteen ulnar collateral ligaments were torn, including eight nondisplaced (57%) and six displaced (43%) tears. For the presence of tear, diagnostic accuracy of conventional arthrography, low-field-strength MR imaging, high-field- strength MR imaging, low-field-strength MR arthrography, and high-field- strength MR arthrography was 83%, 89%, 90%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. With regard to displacement of the torn ligament, diagnostic accuracy was 61%, 89%, 90%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. MR arthrograms were rated superior to standard MR images in 72% and 90% of specimens with low-field-strength and high-field-strength magnets, respectively. CONCLUSION: Of the tested methods, MR arthrography proved to be the most sensitive to the diagnosis of a torn ulnar collateral ligament of the first metacarpophalangeal joint and of displacement of the torn ligament.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Lee, T. B. Hunter, and M. Taljanovic Musculoskeletal Colloquialisms: How Did We Come Up with These Names? RadioGraphics, July 1, 2004; 24(4): 1009 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Clavero, X. Alomar, J. M. Monill, M. Esplugas, P. Golano, M. Mendoza, and A. Salvador MR Imaging of Ligament and Tendon Injuries of the Fingers RadioGraphics, March 1, 2002; 22(2): 237 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. H. Theumann, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, J.-L. Drape, D. J. Trudell, and D. Resnick MR Imaging of the Metacarpophalangeal Joints of the Fingers: Part I. Conventional MR Imaging and MR Arthrographic Findings in Cadavers Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 437 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. W. A. Pfirrmann, N. H. Theumann, M. J. Botte, J.-L. Drape, D. J. Trudell, and D. Resnick MR Imaging of the Metacarpophalangeal Joints of the Fingers: Part II. Detection of Simulated Injuries in Cadavers Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 447 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]