Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korbin, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Doubilet, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Korbin, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Doubilet, P. M.

Radiology, Vol 206, 773-775, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Placental implantation on the amniotic sheet: effect on pregnancy outcome

CD Korbin, CB Benson and PM Doubilet
Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

PURPOSE: To assess pregnancy outcome in patients with amniotic sheets and to determine whether outcome is affected by placental implantation on the amniotic sheet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sonograms obtained during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters were reviewed in 157 patients with amniotic sheets to confirm the presence of an amniotic sheet and to determine the relationship of the placenta to the amniotic sheet. The cesarean section rate, gestational age at birth, birth weight, birth weight percentile, and Apgar score 1 minute after birth were recorded in patients in whom the postnatal follow-up data were available. Data were compared with overall data obtained at the authors' institution during the same period. RESULTS: The placenta appeared implanted on the amniotic sheet in 41 (26.1%) of the 157 patients. In the 120 patients with amniotic sheets and follow-up data, the cesarean section rate was 32.5% compared with 21.5% overall. The mean gestational age at birth was slightly lower than that overall (38.2 vs 39.0 weeks, P < .001), but the birth weight percentile was similar (48.6% vs 50.0%, P = .58). No statistically significant differences were found in postnatal follow- up data between pregnancies with placental implantation on and in those without implantation on the amniotic sheet. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy outcome is similar in patients with and in those without placental implantation on the amniotic sheet.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
E. Burton
Serial Evaluations of Perinatal Uterine Synechiae Versus Amniotic Bands
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, January 1, 2004; 20(1): 51 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.