|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 207, 201-206, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
PM Boiselle, SS Reddy, PA Villas, A Liu and JP Seibyl
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
PURPOSE: To assess the policies and practices of nuclear medicine facilities as regards ventilation-perfusion (V-P) imaging in pregnant patients suspected of having pulmonary embolus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surveys were mailed to physician-directors of 1,000 randomly selected facilities at which nuclear imaging studies are performed. Information gathered included use of V-P imaging in pregnant patients, written policies, informed consent procedures, and modifications of standard protocols. RESULTS: Of the 1,000 surveys mailed, 327 (33%) completed surveys were returned. Of these 327 respondents, 220 (67%) reported that they perform V-P imaging in pregnant patients suspected of having pulmonary embolus. Of these 220 respondents, 115 (52%) routinely obtain informed consent, and 170 (77%) modify their standard V-P imaging protocol for pregnant patients. The most common modification (135 [79%] of 170 respondents) was reduction of the perfusion agent dose. Reported practice patterns for written policies, informed consent, and modifications did not show statistically significant trends among respondents in varying practice settings or geographic locations. CONCLUSION: Most respondents perform V-P imaging in pregnant patients suspected of having pulmonary embolus, with considerable variability in their policies and practices.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Scarsbrook, K. Bradley, F. Gleeson, A. M. Groves, S. J. Yates, T. Win, I. Kayani, J. Bomanji, and P. J. Ell Perfusion Scintigraphy Still has Important Role in Evaluation of Majority of Pregnant Patients with Suspicion of Pulmonary Embolism Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 623 - 625. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Matthews Imaging pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: what is the most appropriate imaging protocol? Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 79(941): 441 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Hurwitz, T. Yoshizumi, R. E. Reiman, P. C. Goodman, E. K. Paulson, D. P. Frush, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and L. Barnes Radiation Dose to the Fetus from Body MDCT During Early Gestation. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 871 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Schuster, J. E. Fishman, J. F. Copeland, H. Hatabu, and P. M. Boiselle Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnant Patients: A Survey of Practices and Policies for CT Pulmonary Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1495 - 1498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. T. Winer-Muram, J. M. Boone, H. L. Brown, S. G. Jennings, W. C. Mabie, and G. T. Lombardo Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnant Patients: Fetal Radiation Dose with Helical CT Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 487 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Chan, J. G. Ray, S. Murray, G. E. Coady, G. Coates, and J. S. Ginsberg Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Clinical Presentation, Results of Lung Scanning, and Subsequent Maternal and Pediatric Outcomes Arch Intern Med, May 27, 2002; 162(10): 1170 - 1175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Kalbhen Answer Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178 (5): 1285 - 1286. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |