|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 207, 363-367, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
TV Bell, HM Fenlon, BD Davison, HK Ahari and S Hussain
Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, MA 02118, USA.
PURPOSE: To identify imaging features at unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) that help differentiate distal ureteral calculi from pelvic phleboliths. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of 184 pelvic calcifications identified at unenhanced helical CT in 113 patients. The size, shape, and attenuation of each calcification were recorded in addition to the presence of a central lucency and the appearance of the adjacent soft tissues. With profile analysis, a graphic representation was generated of attenuation in each pixel along a line drawn through each calcification. RESULTS: Geometric configuration was seen in eight (21%) calculi but not in any phleboliths. Differences were significant (P < .0001) between the mean attenuation of calculi and that of phleboliths. Among phleboliths, none had a mean attenuation greater than 278 HU, 13 (9%) had a visible central lucency, 31 (21%) had a bifid peak at profile analysis, 30 (21%) had the "comet sign" (adjacent eccentric, tapering soft-tissue mass corresponding to the noncalcified portion of a pelvic vein), and three (2%) had the soft-tissue rim sign (edema of the ureteral wall). Among calculi, none had a central lucency, bifid peak, or comet sign, but 29 (76%) had the soft-tissue rim sign. CONCLUSION: Analysis of pelvic calcifications at unenhanced helical CT can help differentiate calculi from phleboliths.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F Regan, B Kuszyk, M E Bohlman, and S Jackman Acute ureteric calculus obstruction: unenhanced spiral CT versus HASTE MR urography and abdominal radiograph Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2005; 78(930): 506 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Memarsadeghi, G. Heinz-Peer, T. H. Helbich, C. Schaefer-Prokop, G. Kramer, M. Scharitzer, and M. Prokop Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT in Patients Suspected of Having Urinary Stone Disease: Effect of Section Width on Diagnosis Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 530 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Rucker, C. O. Menias, and S. Bhalla Mimics of Renal Colic: Alternative Diagnoses at Unenhanced Helical CT RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S11 - S28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Dyer, M. Y. Chen, and R. J. Zagoria Classic Signs in Uroradiology RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S247 - S280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Al-Nakshabandi The Soft-Tissue Rim Sign Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 239 - 240. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, and W. P. Shuman Evaluation of the Patient with Flank Pain and Possible Ureteral Calculus Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 319 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Spielmann, J. P. Heneghan, L. J. Lee, T. Yoshizumi, and R. C. Nelson Decreasing the Radiation Dose for Renal Stone CT: A Feasibility Study of Single- and Multidetector CT Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1058 - 1062. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Guest, R. H. Cohan, M. Korobkin, J. F. Platt, C. C. Bundschu, I. R. Francis, A. Gebramarium, and U. M. Murray Assessment of the Clinical Utility of the Rim and Comet-Tail Signs in Differentiating Ureteral Stones from Phleboliths Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1285 - 1291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Van Beers, S. Dechambre, P. Hulcelle, R. Materne, and J. Jamart Value of Multislice Helical CT Scans and Maximum-Intensity-Projection Images to Improve Detection of Ureteral Stones at Abdominal Radiography Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1117 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sudah, R. Vanninen, K. Partanen, A. Heino, P. Vainio, and M. Ala-Opas MR Urography in Evaluation of Acute Flank Pain: T2-Weighted Sequences and Gadolinium-Enhanced Three-Dimensional FLASH Compared with Urography Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 105 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. Liu, S. J. Esler, B. J. Kenny, R. H. Goh, A. J. Rainbow, and G. W. Stevenson Low-Dose Nonenhanced Helical CT of Renal Colic: Assessment of Ureteric Stone Detection and Measurement of Effective Dose Equivalent Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 51 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. C. Dalrymple, B. Casford, D. P. Raiken, K. D. Elsass, and R. A. Pagan Pearls and Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Ureterolithiasis with Unenhanced Helical CT : (CME available in print version and on RSNA Link) RadioGraphics, March 1, 2000; 20(2): 439 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Novelline, J. T. Rhea, P. M. Rao, and J. L. Stuk Helical CT in Emergency Radiology Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 321 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Siegel and R. G. Evens Advances in the Use of Computed Tomography JAMA, April 14, 1999; 281(14): 1252 - 1254. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sudah, R. L. Vanninen, K. Partanen, S. Kainulainen, A. Malinen, A. Heino, and M. Ala-Opas Patients with Acute Flank Pain: Comparison of MR Urography with Unenhanced Helical CT Radiology, April 1, 2002; 223(1): 98 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |