Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bae, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by Brink, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bae, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by Brink, J. A.

Radiology, Vol 207, 647-655, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part I. Prediction with a computer model

KT Bae, JP Heiken and JA Brink
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

PURPOSE: To develop a physiologic model of contrast medium enhancement by incorporating available physiologic data and contrast medium pharmacokinetics and to predict organ-specific contrast medium enhancement at computed tomography (CT) with various contrast medium injection protocols in patients of variable height and weight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computer-based, compartmental model of the cardiovascular system was generated by using human physiologic parameters and more than 100 differential equations to describe the transport of contrast medium. Blood volume, extracellular fluid volume, and regional blood flow were estimated from available data. Local structures were modeled mathematically to describe the distribution and dispersion of intravascularly administered iodinated contrast medium. A global model was formed by integrating regional circulation parameters with the models of local structures. Aortic and hepatic CT contrast- enhancement curves were simulated for three protocols and were compared with mean enhancement curves in three groups of 25-28 patients (80 patients total; 28 in one group, 25 in one group, and 27 in one group) receiving the same protocols. The percent difference in maximum enhancement between the simulated and empiric curves and the enhancement difference index (sum of the area difference between the simulated and empiric curves divided by the total area under the empiric curve) were computed. RESULTS: The simulated and empiric enhancement curves closely agreed in maximum enhancement (the mean percent difference in the aorta was 7.4%; liver, 4.8%) and in variation over time (mean enhancement difference index in the aorta was 11.6%; liver, 12.7%). CONCLUSION: A computer-based, physiologic model that may help predict organ-specific CT contrast medium enhancement for different injection protocols was developed. Such a physiologic model may have many clinical applications.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. F. Behrendt, A. H. Mahnken, S. Stanzel, P. Seidensticker, E. Jost, R. W. Gunther, and G. Muhlenbruch
Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast Media Concentrations for Combined Abdominal and Thoracic MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 145 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, T. Nakaura, T. Namimoto, S. Oda, Y. Funama, and Y. Yamashita
Optimal Contrast Dose for Depiction of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Dynamic CT Using 64-MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 1003 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. T. Bae, B. A. Seeck, C. F. Hildebolt, C. Tao, F. Zhu, M. Kanematsu, and P. K. Woodard
Contrast Enhancement in Cardiovascular MDCT: Effect of Body Weight, Height, Body Surface Area, Body Mass Index, and Obesity
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 777 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
V. S. Lee, H. Rusinek, L. Bokacheva, A. J. Huang, N. Oesingmann, Q. Chen, M. Kaur, K. Prince, T. Song, E. L. Kramer, et al.
Renal function measurements from MR renography and a simplified multicompartmental model
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): F1548 - F1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Schoellnast, H. A. Deutschmann, A. Berghold, G. A. Fritz, G. J. Schaffler, and M. Tillich
MDCT Angiography of the Pulmonary Arteries: Influence of Body Weight, Body Mass Index, and Scan Length on Arterial Enhancement at Different Iodine Flow Rates
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 1074 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Itoh, M. Ikeda, H. Satake, T. Ota, and T. Ishigaki
The effect of patient age on contrast enhancement during CT of the pancreatobiliary region.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 505 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Orlandini, S. Boini, S. Iochum-Duchamps, T. Batch, X. Zhu, and A. Blum
Assessment of the use of a saline chaser to reduce the volume of contrast medium in abdominal CT.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 511 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Goshima, M. Kanematsu, H. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, T. Miyoshi, H. Nishibori, H. Kato, H. Hoshi, M. Onozuka, and N. Moriyama
MDCT of the liver and hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: optimizing scan delays for bolus-tracking techniques of hepatic arterial and portal venous phases.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): W25 - W32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Awai, A. Hatcho, Y. Nakayama, S. Kusunoki, D. Liu, M. Hatemura, Y. Funama, M. Denbo, N. Sato, and Y. Yamashita
Simulation of Aortic Peak Enhancement on MDCT Using a Contrast Material Flow Phantom: Feasibility Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 379 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S Fenchel, T R Fleiter, A J Aschoff, R van Gessel, H-J Brambs, and E M Merkle
Effect of iodine concentration of contrast media on contrast enhancement in multislice CT of the pancreas
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2004; 77(922): 821 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Awai, K. Hiraishi, and S. Hori
Effect of Contrast Material Injection Duration and Rate on Aortic Peak Time and Peak Enhancement at Dynamic CT Involving Injection Protocol with Dose Tailored to Patient Weight
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 142 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. T. Bae
Peak Contrast Enhancement in CT and MR Angiography: When Does It Occur and Why? Pharmacokinetic Study in a Porcine Model
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 809 - 816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. D. Rubin, A. J. Schmidt, L. J. Logan, and M. C. Sofilos
Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography of Lower Extremity Arterial Inflow and Runoff: Initial Experience
Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 146 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. T. Bae, H. Q. Tran, and J. P. Heiken
Multiphasic Injection Method for Uniform Prolonged Vascular Enhancement at CT Angiography: Pharmacokinetic Analysis and Experimental Porcine Model
Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 872 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Fleischmann, G. D. Rubin, A. A. Bankier, and K. Hittmair
Improved Uniformity of Aortic Enhancement with Customized Contrast Medium Injection Protocols at CT Angiography
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 363 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.