Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westerhof, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Oestmann, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westerhof, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Oestmann, J. W.

Radiology, Vol 207, 675-681, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value?

JP Westerhof, U Fischer, JD Moritz and JW Oestmann
Department of Diagnostic Radiology I, Georg-August-Universitat, Gottingen, Germany.

PURPOSE: To assess the value of dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with mammographically detected suspicious microcalcifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients (age range, 31-84 years; mean age, 56 years) with mammographically suspicious clustered microcalcifications underwent dynamic MR imaging of the breast before surgical biopsy. MR imaging was performed with a 1.5-T unit and a two-dimensional fast low-angle shot sequence with a flip angle of 80 degrees. Thirty-two axial sections, 4 mm thick and without interval gaps, were acquired before and five times after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (dose, 0.1 mmol per kilogram of bodyweight). Histologic findings were used as the standard of reference. Any effect of MR imaging on surgical management was noted. RESULTS: Biopsy findings verified five patients with T1 invasive carcinomas, 33 with ductal carcinomas in situ, 13 with proliferative fibrocystic disease, eight with nonproliferative fibrocystic disease, and four with sclerosing adenosis. Contrast material-enhanced dynamic MR imaging had a sensitivity of 45%, a specificity of 72%, and an overall accuracy of 56% in differentiating benign from malignant microcalcifications. All invasive tumors were detected with MR imaging. In no case was surgical management altered by MR imaging findings. CONCLUSION: MR imaging of the breast is not reliable in differentiation of benign from malignant breast disease in mammographically suspicious clustered microcalcifications and has no effect on treatment.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Perrone, L. Lo Mele, S. Sassi, M. Marini, L. Testaverde, L. Izzo, and M. Marini
MDCT of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1644 - 1651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Kuhl
The Current Status of Breast MR Imaging * Part I. Choice of Technique, Image Interpretation, Diagnostic Accuracy, and Transfer to Clinical Practice
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 356 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Bazzocchi, C. Zuiani, P. Panizza, C. Del Frate, F. Soldano, M. Isola, F. Sardanelli, G. M. Giuseppetti, G. Simonetti, V. Lattanzio, et al.
Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1723 - 1732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl, H. H. Schild, and N. Morakkabati
Dynamic Bilateral Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of the Breast: Trade-off between Spatial and Temporal Resolution
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 789 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. Hylton
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast: Opportunities to Improve Breast Cancer Management
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1678 - 1684.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Teifke, H. A. Lehr, T. W. Vomweg, A. Hlawatsch, and M. Thelen
Outcome Analysis and Rational Management of Enhancing Lesions Incidentally Detected on Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 655 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. G. A. Gilhuijs, E. E. Deurloo, S. H. Muller, J. L. Peterse, and L. J. Schultze Kool
Breast MR Imaging in Women at Increased Lifetime Risk of Breast Cancer: Clinical System for Computerized Assessment of Breast Lesions—Initial Results
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 907 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel and M. D. Schnall
MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 13 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. K. Moon, J.-G. Im, Y. H. Koh, D.-Y. Noh, and I. A. Park
US of Mammographically Detected Clustered Microcalcifications
Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 849 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.