Radiology, Vol 208, 125-128, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Head trauma: CT scan interpretation by radiology residents versus staff radiologists

MG Wysoki, CJ Nassar, RA Koenigsberg, RA Novelline, SH Faro and EN Faerber
Department of Radiology, Allegheny University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine the rate and clinical outcome of discrepancies in interpretation by radiology residents and staff neuroradiologists of posttraumatic cranial computed tomographic (CT) scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective evaluation was performed for 419 consecutive emergency posttraumatic cranial CT studies that had been interpreted by radiology residents on call over a 16-month period. Discrepancies between the interpretations made by residents and those made by staff radiologists were divided into two groups: failure to recognize an abnormality (false-negative finding) and interpretation of normal as abnormal (false-positive finding). Discrepancies were considered major if they could affect patient care in the emergency setting and minor if they could not. RESULTS: Major and minor discrepancies were 1.7% and 2.6%, respectively, among interpretations made by residents and those by staff radiologists. Major discrepancies were four subdural hematomas, one pneumocephalus, one hemorrhagic contusion, and one subarachnoid hemorrhage. Minor discrepancies included six skull and five facial fractures. The discrepancy rate was statistically significantly higher (12.2%) when CT findings were abnormal than when they were normal (1.5%). No change in treatment was attributed to the delay in diagnosis. CONCLUSION: A low discrepancy rate was found between interpretations made by radiology residents and those made by staff neuroradiologists of posttraumatic cranial CT scans. There were no adverse clinical outcomes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. G. Filippi, B. Schneider, H. N. Burbank, G. F. Alsofrom, G. Linnell, and B. Ratkovits Discrepancy Rates of Radiology Resident Interpretations of On-Call Neuroradiology MR Imaging Studies Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 972 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W.M. Strub, J.L. Leach, T. Tomsick, and A. Vagal Overnight Preliminary Head CT Interpretations Provided by Residents: Locations of Misidentified Intracranial Hemorrhage AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2007; 28(9): 1679 - 1682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. B. Ruchman, J. Jaeger, E. F. Wiggins III, S. Seinfeld, V. Thakral, S. Bolla, and S. Wallach Preliminary Radiology Resident Interpretations Versus Final Attending Radiologist Interpretations and the Impact on Patient Care in a Community Hospital Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 523 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.D. Zimmerman, J.A. Maldjian, N.C. Brun, B. Horvath, and B.E. Skolnick Radiologic Estimation of Hematoma Volume in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Trial by CT Scan AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 666 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Roos, B. Chilla, M. Zanetti, M. Schmid, P. Koch, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, and J. Hodler MRI of Meniscal Lesions: Soft-Copy (PACS) and Hard-Copy Evaluation Versus Reviewer Experience. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 786 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B Mucci, C Brett, L S Huntley, and M K Greene Cranial computed tomography in trauma: the accuracy of interpretation by staff in the emergency department Emerg. Med. J., August 1, 2005; 22(8): 538 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Ginsberg, V. King, and D. M. Panicek Comparison of Interpretations of CT Angiograms in the Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism by On-Call Radiology Fellows and Subsequently by Radiology Faculty Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 61 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Carney, J. Kempf, V. DeCarvalho, A. Yudd, and J. Nosher Preliminary Interpretations of After-Hours CT and Sonography by Radiology Residents Versus Final Interpretations by Body Imaging Radiologists at a Level 1 Trauma Center Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 367 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. K. Erly, B. C. Ashdown, R. W. Lucio II, R. F. Carmody, J. F. Seeger, and J. N. Alcala Evaluation of Emergency CT Scans of the Head: Is There a Community Standard? Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2003; 180(6): 1727 - 1730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. K. Erly, W. G. Berger, E. Krupinski, J. F. Seeger, and J. A. Guisto Radiology Resident Evaluation of Head CT Scan Orders in the Emergency Department AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 103 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. R. Lal, U. M. Murray, O. P. Eldevik, and J. S. Desmond Clinical Consequences of Misinterpretations of Neuroradiologic CT Scans by On-CallRadiology Residents AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2000; 21(1): 124 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Wysoki Trauma Head CT Interpretation by Radiology Residents versus Staff Radiologists Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 283 - 283. [Full Text] [PDF]