Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Sandler, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Sandler, C. M.

Radiology, Vol 208, 97-102, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Ureterolithiasis: can clinical outcome be predicted with unenhanced helical CT?

N Takahashi, A Kawashima, RD Ernst, IC Boridy, SM Goldman, GS Benson and CM Sandler
Department of Radiology, Lyndon B. Johnson General Hospital, Houston, TX 77026, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of helical computed tomography (CT) without contrast material enhancement for prediction of a favorable outcome in ureterolithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT studies were reviewed in 69 patients with a single ureteral stone not located at the ureteropelvic junction. CT findings (tissue rim sign, hydronephrosis, perinephric fat stranding, perinephric fluid collections, and thickening of renal fascia) were graded on a scale of 0-3. Stone diameter and renal parenchymal enlargement were also measured. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients had spontaneous passage, 12 did not respond to conservative treatment, and 35 were lost to follow-up. When the latter 35 patients were excluded, perinephric fat stranding (P = .044) and perinephric fluid collections (P = .021) were graded significantly higher in patients with spontaneous stone passage. Mean stone diameter was significantly larger (P < .001) in patients in whom conservative treatment failed (mean, 7.8 mm) than in patients with spontaneous stone passage (mean, 2.9 mm). The presence of a tissue rim sign and the grade of hydronephrosis, renal fascial thickening, and renal parenchymal enlargement were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In addition to stone size, the degree of perinephric fat stranding and the presence of perinephric fluid collections are useful ancillary signs for help in predicting the likelihood of stone passage.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Takahashi, R. P. Hartman, T. J. Vrtiska, A. Kawashima, A. N. Primak, O. P. Dzyubak, J. N. Mandrekar, J. G. Fletcher, and C. H. McCollough
Dual-Energy CT Iodine-Subtraction Virtual Unenhanced Technique to Detect Urinary Stones in an Iodine-Filled Collecting System: A Phantom Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1169 - 1173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S J Freeman and H Sells
Investigation of loin pain
Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 38 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S J Freeman and H Sells
Investigation of loin pain
Imaging, August 1, 2005; 17(1): 19 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, and W. P. Shuman
Evaluation of the Patient with Flank Pain and Possible Ureteral Calculus
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 319 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. L. Eisenberg and L. Berlin
When Does Malpractice Become Manslaughter?
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 331 - 335.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
O. Catalano, A. Nunziata, F. Altei, and A. Siani
Suspected Ureteral Colic: Primary Helical CT Versus Selective Helical CT After Unenhanced Radiography and Sonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 379 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. R. Guest, R. H. Cohan, M. Korobkin, J. F. Platt, C. C. Bundschu, I. R. Francis, A. Gebramarium, and U. M. Murray
Assessment of the Clinical Utility of the Rim and Comet-Tail Signs in Differentiating Ureteral Stones from Phleboliths
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1285 - 1291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. S. Georgiades, C. J. Moore, and D. P. Smith
Differences of Renal Parenchymal Attenuation for Acutely Obstructed and Unobstructed Kidneys on Unenhanced Helical CT: A Useful Secondary Sign?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2001; 176(4): 965 - 968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Z. Assi, J. F. Platt, I. R. Francis, R. H. Cohan, and M. Korobkin
Sensitivity of CT Scout Radiography and Abdominal Radiography for Revealing Ureteral Calculi on Helical CT: Implications for Radiologic Follow-Up
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 333 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. C. Smith and M. Varanelli
Diagnosis and Management of Acute Ureterolithiasis: CT Is Truth
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2000; 175(1): 3 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Liu, S. J. Esler, B. J. Kenny, R. H. Goh, A. J. Rainbow, and G. W. Stevenson
Low-Dose Nonenhanced Helical CT of Renal Colic: Assessment of Ureteric Stone Detection and Measurement of Effective Dose Equivalent
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 51 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. S. Amis Jr
Epitaph for the Urogram
Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 639 - 640.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
I. C. Boridy, A. Kawashima, S. M. Goldman, and C. M. Sandler
Acute Ureterolithiasis: Nonenhanced Helical CT Findings of Perinephric Edema for Prediction of Degree of Ureteral Obstruction
Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 663 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.