Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wintersperger, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wintersperger, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, M. F.

Radiology, Vol 208, 345-351, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Patency of coronary bypass grafts: assessment with breath-hold contrast- enhanced MR angiography--value of a non-electrocardiographically triggered technique

BJ Wintersperger, MG Engelmann, A von Smekal, A Knez, HV Penzkofer, B Hofling, G Laub and MF Reiser
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig- Maximilians-University Munich, Germany.

PURPOSE: To determine the value of non-electrocardiographically triggered contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in assessing the patency of venous and internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts after coronary bypass surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with 76 coronary bypass grafts (48 venous, 28 ITA) were examined 26.5 months +/- 5.8 after surgery with MR angiography and conventional angiography. MR angiography was performed with a three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence after automated injection of contrast material; contrast agent administration was based on measurement of the individual transit time of the agent. Results of MR angiography were interpreted by two independent observers and compared with results of conventional angiography. RESULTS: The independent interpretations of the MR angiograms agreed with the results of conventional angiography in 96% and 91% of the grafts. After a final consensus reading, sensitivity was 95% for all grafts, 94% for venous grafts, and 96% for ITA grafts. Specificity was 85% for venous grafts and 67% for ITA grafts. Positive predictive value was 95% for all grafts, 94% for venous grafts, and 96% for ITA grafts. CONCLUSION: Non-electrocardiographically triggered contrast-enhanced MR angiography allows reliable assessment of the patency of venous and arterial coronary bypass grafts.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. A. Bluemke, S. Achenbach, M. Budoff, T. C. Gerber, B. Gersh, L. D. Hillis, W. G. Hundley, W. J. Manning, B. F. Printz, M. Stuber, et al.
Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young
Circulation, July 29, 2008; 118(5): 586 - 606.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N I Stauder, B Klumpp, H Stauder, G Blumenstock, M Fenchel, A Kuttner, C D Claussen, and S Miller
Assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts by magnetic resonance imaging
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 80(960): 975 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. M. Jones, T. Athanasiou, P. P. Tekkis, V. Malinovski, S. Purkayastha, A. Haq, J. Kokotsakis, and A. Darzi
Does Doppler echography have a diagnostic role in patency assessment of internal thoracic artery grafts?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 28(5): 692 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N I Stauder, A M Scheule, U Hahn, M Fenchel, F S Eckstein, U Kramer, C D Claussen, and S Miller
Perioperative monitoring of flow and patency in native and grafted internal mammary arteries using a combined MR protocol
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2005; 78(928): 292 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. I. Stauder, M. Fenchel, H. Stauder, A. Kuttner, A. M. Scheule, U. Kramer, C. D. Claussen, and S. Miller
Assessment of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery by means of magnetic resonance imaging
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2005; 129(3): 607 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. Marano, M. L. Storto, N. Maddestra, and L. Bonomo
Could multidetector computed tomography play a role in the management of patients readmitted with recurrent chest pain after surgical coronary revascularization?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2005; 129(3): 686 - 687.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. H. Bunce, C. H. Lorenz, A. S. John, J. R. Lesser, R. H. Mohiaddin, and D. J. Pennell
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patency: Assessment with True Fast Imaging with Steady-State Precession versus Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 440 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. E. Langerak, H. W. Vliegen, J. W. Jukema, P. Kunz, A. H. Zwinderman, H. J. Lamb, E. E. van der Wall, and A. de Roos
Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Noninvasive Detection of Stenosis in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts and Recipient Coronary Arteries
Circulation, March 25, 2003; 107(11): 1502 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. L. F. Bedaux, M. B. M. Hofman, S. L. A. Vyt, J. G. F. Bronzwaer, C. A. Visser, and A. C. van Rossum
Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance determination of flow reserve
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2002; 40(10): 1848 - 1855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Tello, G. G. Hartnell, P. Costello, and C. P. Ecker
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Flow: Qualitative Evaluation with Cine Single-Detector Row CT and Comparison with Findings at Angiography
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 913 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. E. Langerak, H. W. Vliegen, A. de Roos, A. H. Zwinderman, J. W. Jukema, P. Kunz, H. J. Lamb, and E. E. van der Wall
Detection of Vein Graft Disease Using High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Circulation, January 22, 2002; 105(3): 328 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Ishida, H. Sakuma, B. P. Cruz, T. Shimono, T. Tokui, I. Yada, K. Takeda, and C. B. Higgins
MR Flow Measurement in the Internal Mammary Artery-to-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Comparison with Graft Stenosis at Radiographic Angiography
Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 441 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. O. Vetter, R. Driever, H. Mertens, U. Kempkes, and B. M. Cramer
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of mammary artery grafts after minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2001; 71(4): 1229 - 1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Regenfus, D. Ropers, S. Achenbach, W. Kessler, G. Laub, W. G. Daniel, and W. Moshage
Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2000; 36(1): 44 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. E. Langerak, P. Kunz, H. W. Vliegen, J. W. Jukema, A. H. Zwinderman, P. Steendijk, H. J. Lamb, E. E. van der Wall, and A. de Roos
MR Flow Mapping in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts: A Validation Study with Doppler Flow Measurements
Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 127 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.