Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oppo, K.
Right arrow Articles by McArdle, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oppo, K.
Right arrow Articles by McArdle, C. S.

Radiology, Vol 208, 453-457, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Doppler perfusion index: an interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility study

K Oppo, E Leen, WJ Angerson, TG Cooke and CS McArdle
University Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland.

PURPOSE: To assess the potential of Doppler perfusion index (DPI) measurement as a routine diagnostic tool in the detection of occult colorectal liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By using color doppler ultrasound, two independent sonologists performed DPI measurements blindly in 20 patients aged 30-82 years; interobserver reproducibility was assessed. A second group of 20 patients aged 37-88 years were examined to assess the level of intraobserver reproducibility of DPI measurements attained by one sonologist. For each patient in this group, the DPI was measured three times in succession, and the variability between measurements was analyzed. Calculations of the intraclass correlation coefficient and the coefficient of variation (CV) were used to determine the levels of reproducibility. The data were also analyzed by using the Student paired t test, with significance established at P less than .05. RESULTS: The interobserver CV and intraobserver CV were 20% and 16%, respectively. The two sonologists who examined the first group of patients agreed independently on the DPI status in 18 of 20 (90%) patients. CONCLUSION: In this study, both the intraobserver reproducibility and the interobserver reproducibility of DPI measurements were clinically acceptable.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
Z A Aziz, J C Davies, E W Alton, A U Wells, D M Geddes, and D M Hansell
Computed tomography and cystic fibrosis: promises and problems
Thorax, February 1, 2007; 62(2): 181 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. V. Pandharipande, G. A. Krinsky, H. Rusinek, and V. S. Lee
Perfusion Imaging of the Liver: Current Challenges and Future Goals
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 661 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
K. V. Ramnarine, E. Leen, K. Oppo, W. J. Angerson, and C. S. McArdle
Contrast-Enhanced Doppler Perfusion Index: Clinical and Experimental Evaluation
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2002; 21(10): 1121 - 1129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Wetzel, S. Cha, G. Johnson, P. Lee, M. Law, D. L. Kasow, S. D. Pierce, and X. Xue
Relative Cerebral Blood Volume Measurements in Intracranial Mass Lesions: Interobserver and Intraobserver Reproducibility Study
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 797 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
M. Kluckow and N. Evans
Superior vena cava flow in newborn infants: a novel marker of systemic blood flow
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2000; 82(3): 182F - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Nakai, H. Asakura, A. Oya, A. Yokota, T. Koshino, and T. Araki
Pulsed Doppler US Findings of Renal Interlobar Arteries in Pregnancy-induced Hypertension
Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 423 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.