Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sickles, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sickles, E. A.

Radiology, Vol 208, 471-475, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Findings at mammographic screening on only one standard projection: outcomes analysis

EA Sickles
Department of Radiology, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco 94143-1667, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine the radiographic and clinical outcomes of findings seen at mammographic screening on only one standard projection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To identify prospectively marked benign-appearing and abnormal findings that were seen on only one standard projection, 63,836 consecutive two-view mammographic screening studies were reviewed. Subsequent outcomes analysis included determination of the frequency of occurrence, mammographic features, work-up performed, and final imaging assessment. For imaging findings that prompted tissue sampling, histopathologic diagnosis was recorded. To identify breast cancers among the remaining findings, screening cases were linked with a regional tumor registry. RESULTS: Of the 61,273 screening studies available for review, 2,023 (3.3%) involved prospectively identified findings seen on only one standard projection. One thousand eighty-six (53.7%) studies with one-view-only findings were judged to represent superimposition of normal breast structures (summation artifact) simply from the standard projections obtained at screening; findings in an additional 587 (29.0%) studies were characterized as representing superimposition of normal structures after recall for further diagnostic imaging. None of these 1,673 cases was subsequently found to be cancer. Cancers were identified in 36 one- view-only studies; six involved ductal carcinoma in situ; 18, invasive ductal carcinoma; and 12, invasive lobular carcinoma (a large percentage [33%], since only 10% of all cancers are invasive lobular carcinoma). CONCLUSION: Findings seen on only one standard projection are common among lesions identified at mammographic screening. More than 80% can be correctly assessed as representing superimposition of normal structures, either without or with the aid of additional imaging studies. Among those findings that truly are cancer, a disproportionately high percentage are invasive lobular carcinoma.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. W. T. Leung and E. A. Sickles
Developing Asymmetry Identified on Mammography: Correlation with Imaging Outcome and Pathologic Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 667 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Sumkin, B. L. Holbert, J. S. Herrmann, C. A. Hakim, M. A. Ganott, W. R. Poller, R. Shah, L. A. Hardesty, and D. Gur
Optimal Reference Mammography: A Comparison of Mammograms Obtained 1 and 2 Years Before the Present Examination
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 343 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. P. Evans, L. J. Warren Burhenne, L. Laurie, K. F. O'Shaughnessy, and R. A. Castellino
Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Mammographic Characteristics and Computer-aided Detection
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 182 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. Wells, D. Rupley, E. A. Sickles, K. L. Pearson, S. D. Frankel, and J. W. T. Leung
What Should Be Done First in the Imaging Workup of Densities Seen on Only One Standard Mammographic View: Diagnostic Mammography or Sonography?
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 545 - 546.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. A. Berg, C. Campassi, P. Langenberg, and M. J. Sexton
Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: Inter- and Intraobserver Variability in Feature Analysis and Final Assessment
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1769 - 1777.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. L. Pearson, E. A. Sickles, S. D. Frankel, and J. W. T. Leung
Efficacy of Step-Oblique Mammography for Confirmation and Localization of Densities Seen on Only One Standard Mammographic View
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 745 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey, R. E. Fechner, and M. M. Moore
Apparent Ipsilateral Decrease in Breast Size at Mammography: A Sign of Infiltrating Lobular Carcinoma
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 883 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. Cyrlak and P. M. Carpenter
Cases of the Day : Breast Imaging Case of the Day
RadioGraphics, October 1, 1999; 19(90001): 73 - 79.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.