Radiology, Vol 208, 655-661, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Hemodialysis access graft stenosis: US detection

ML Robbin, RF Oser, M Allon, MW Clements, J Dockery, TM Weber, KM Hamrick-Waller, JK Smith, BC Jones, DE Morgan and S Saddekni
Dept of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35233, USA.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the sensitivity of ultrasonography (US) in diagnosing stenosis of hemodialysis access grafts and their drainage veins in patients clinically suspected of having graft dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients in whom dysfunction of their hemodialysis access grafts was suspected underwent both Doppler US and angiography. Gray-scale and color US were combined with spectral analysis of the graft, anastomoses, and venous outflow. Flow velocity at anastomoses and suspected stenotic areas was measured. The volume of flow in the graft was also measured. The prospective US criterion for diagnosis of stenosis was a focal twofold or higher elevation of peak systolic velocity (PSV) compared with the PSV immediately upstream. A blinded angiographic evaluation of the graft and drainage veins followed US. Angiographic diagnosis of stenosis required at least 50% narrowing in luminal diameter. US and angiographic results were then compared. RESULTS: Angiography allowed diagnosis of 43 stenoses in 34 patients. US depicted 92% (37 of 40) of these stenoses, with a 94% positive predictive value for any individual patient. Focal 2- to 2.9-times PSV elevation was associated with 75% or greater stenosis. Graft flow volume and resistive index change did not correlate with stenosis. CONCLUSION: US reliably depicts stenoses of hemodialysis access grafts and drainage veins in a clinically selected population when PSV criteria are used.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Schuman, A. Ronfeld, C. Barclay, and P. Heinl Comparison of Clinical Assessment With Ultrasound Flow for Hemodialysis Access Surveillance Arch Surg, December 1, 2007; 142(12): 1129 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Allon Current Management of Vascular Access Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2007; 2(4): 786 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Magnasco, G. Bacchini, A. Cappello, V. La Milia, B. Brezzi, P. Messa, and F. Locatelli Clinical validation of glucose pump test (GPT) compared with ultrasound dilution technology in arteriovenous graft surveillance Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2004; 19(7): 1835 - 1841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Robbin, N. E. Chamberlain, M. E. Lockhart, M. H. Gallichio, C. J. Young, M. H. Deierhoi, and M. Allon Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Maturity: US Evaluation Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 59 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Bodner, M. F. H. Schocke, F. Rachbauer, K. Seppi, S. Peer, A. Fierlinger, T. Sununu, and W. R. Jaschke Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Musculoskeletal Tumors: Combined Color and Power Doppler US and Spectral Wave Analysis Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 410 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Robbin, M. H. Gallichio, M. H. Deierhoi, C. J. Young, T. M. Weber, and M. Allon US Vascular Mapping before Hemodialysis Access Placement Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 83 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. C. Dumars, W. E. Thompson, E. I. Bluth, J. S. Lindberg, M. Yoselevitz, and C. R. B. Merritt Management of Suspected Hemodialysis Graft Dysfunction: Usefulness of Diagnostic US Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 103 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]