Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bader, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Grabenwoger, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bader, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Grabenwoger, F.

Radiology, Vol 209, 129-134, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Hepatic perfusion after liver transplantation: noninvasive measurement with dynamic single-section CT

TR Bader, AM Herneth, W Blaicher, R Steininger, F Muhlbacher, G Lechner and F Grabenwoger
Department of Radiology, University of Vienna, Austria.

PURPOSE: To compare hepatic perfusion values after orthotopic liver transplantation with those in healthy volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dynamic single-section computed tomography (CT) of the liver was performed in 50 participants, including 30 study patients who had undergone orthotopic liver transplantation and had no clinical evidence of postoperative complications (mean age, 53.7 years) and 20 healthy volunteers (control subjects) (mean age, 59.0 years). CT scans were obtained at a single level to include the liver, spleen, aorta, and portal vein. Scans were obtained over 88 seconds (one baseline scan followed by 16 scans every 2 seconds and, then, eight scans every 7 seconds) beginning with the injection of 40 mL of contrast agent (flow rate, 10 mL/sec). On each CT scan, the attenuation of these organs was measured in regions of interest to provide time-attenuation curves. From these data, the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver were calculated, and the hepatic perfusion index was assessed. RESULTS: In control subjects and study patients, respectively, mean arterial hepatic perfusion was 0.16 and 0.25 mL/min/mL (P = .001 [two-tailed paired Student t test]), mean portal venous perfusion was 1.22 and 1.26 mL/min/mL, mean total liver perfusion was 1.38 and 1.50 mL/min/mL (difference not significant), and the mean hepatic perfusion index was 0.12 and 0.16 (P = .002). CONCLUSION: Arterial hepatic perfusion was significantly increased after orthotopic liver transplantation, but differences in portal venous and total liver perfusion were not significant. Dynamic single- section CT might also help evaluate hepatic vascular complications, chronic transplant rejection, and hepatic perfusion in liver cirrhosis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S MIYAZAKI, K MURASE, T YOSHIKAWA, S MORIMOTO, Y OHNO, and K SUGIMURA
A quantitative method for estimating hepatic blood flow using a dual-input single-compartment model
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2008; 81(970): 790 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
X. Ma, A. E. Samir, N.-S. Holalkere, and D. V. Sahani
Optimal Arterial Phase Imaging for Detection of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma Determined by Continuous Image Capture on 16-MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 772 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
N. I. Sainani, O. A. Catalano, N.-S. Holalkere, A. X. Zhu, P. F. Hahn, and D. V. Sahani
Cholangiocarcinoma: Current and Novel Imaging Techniques
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 1263 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Murase, S Miyazaki, and X Yang
An efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters in a dual-input single-compartment model
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 80(953): 371 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Schueller, W. Schima, C. Schueller-Weidekamm, M. Weber, A. Stift, M. Gnant, and R. Prokesch
Multidetector CT of Pancreas: Effects of Contrast Material Flow Rate and Individualized Scan Delay on Enhancement of Pancreas and Tumor Contrast
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 441 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Weidekamm, M. Cejna, L. Kramer, M. Peck-Radosavljevic, and T. R. Bader
Effects of TIPS on Liver Perfusion Measured by Dynamic CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 505 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A Nakashige, J Horiguchi, A Tamura, T Asahara, F Shimamoto, and K Ito
Quantitative measurement of hepatic portal perfusion by multidetector row CT with compensation for respiratory misregistration
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2004; 77(921): 728 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K A Miles
Perfusion CT for the assessment of tumour vascularity: which protocol?
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(suppl_1): S36 - S42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K A Miles and M R Griffiths
Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement?
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2003; 76(904): 220 - 231.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. E. Van Beers, I. Leconte, R. Materne, A. M. Smith, J. Jamart, and Y. Horsmans
Hepatic Perfusion Parameters in Chronic Liver Disease: Dynamic CT Measurements Correlated with Disease Severity
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 667 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Fleischmann, G. D. Rubin, A. A. Bankier, and K. Hittmair
Improved Uniformity of Aortic Enhancement with Customized Contrast Medium Injection Protocols at CT Angiography
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 363 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.