| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Radiology, Vol 209, 243-249, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
H Rusinek, DP Naidich, G McGuinness, BS Leitman, DI McCauley, GA Krinsky, K Clayton and H Cohen
Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016, USA.
PURPOSE: To quantitate the effectiveness of low-dose computed tomography (CT) in the identification of pulmonary nodules while controlling for anatomic nodule characteristics and to establish what factors lead to reduced diagnostic sensitivity at low-dose CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each of six participating radiologist independently rated 200 image panels by using a four-point confidence scale. Conventional images were obtained at 200 mAs; low-dose images were obtained at 20 mAs. To fully control their characteristics, nodules were simulated with a given diameter, shape, and section thickness while preserving the resolution, noise level, and reconstruction artifacts of the original images. Panels were matched so that nodules on low-dose and conventional images had equivalent sizes, locations, and relationships to blood vessels. RESULTS: Among 864 positive panels, 259 (60%) of 432 low-dose panels and 272 (63%) of 432 conventional panels were correctly interpreted (P = .259). Lowering the x-ray dose significantly reduced the detectability of peripheral nodules (P = .019) and nodules separated from blood vessels (P = .044). Surprisingly, 3-mm nodules were detected with approximately equal sensitivity (P = .181) at conventional and low-dose CT. The specificity of low-dose images was 88% (148 of 168 panels) versus 91% (153 of 168 panels) for conventional images (P = .372). CONCLUSION: Low-dose CT is acceptable for pulmonary nodule identification, making it suitable for primary screening. These results confirm the strong effect of size, location, and angiocentricity on the sensitivity of nodule detection with conventional CT.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E J HALL and D J BRENNER Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2008; 81(965): 362 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Kubo, P.-J. P. Lin, W. Stiller, M. Takahashi, H.-U. Kauczor, Y. Ohno, and H. Hatabu Radiation Dose Reduction in Chest CT: A Review Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 335 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K Imai, M Ikeda, S Wada, Y Enchi, and T Niimi Analysis of streak artefacts on CT images using statistics of extremes Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 911 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. K. Gould, J. Fletcher, M. D. Iannettoni, W. R. Lynch, D. E. Midthun, D. P. Naidich, and D. E. Ost Evaluation of Patients With Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer?: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 108S - 130S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Bohy, V. de Maertelaer, A. Roquigny, C. Keyzer, D. Tack, and P. A. Gevenois Multidetector CT in Patients Suspected of Having Lumbar Disk Herniation: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Simulated Low-Dose Techniques Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 524 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Gur Lung Cancer Screening: Radiology's Opportunity Here and Now Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 395 - 397. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. K. Leader, T. E. Warfel, C. R. Fuhrman, S. K. Golla, J. L. Weissfeld, R. S. Avila, W. D. Turner, and B. Zheng Pulmonary Nodule Detection with Low-Dose CT of the Lung: Agreement Among Radiologists Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 973 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Novello, C. Fava, P. Borasio, L. Dogliotti, G. Cortese, B. Crida, G. Selvaggi, P. Lausi, M. P. Brizzi, P. Sperone, et al. Three-year findings of an early lung cancer detection feasibility study with low-dose spiral computed tomography in heavy smokers Ann. Onc., October 1, 2005; 16(10): 1662 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. H. Mulkens, P. Bellinck, M. Baeyaert, D. Ghysen, X. Van Dijck, E. Mussen, C. Venstermans, and J.-L. Termote Use of an Automatic Exposure Control Mechanism for Dose Optimization in Multi-Detector Row CT Examinations: Clinical Evaluation Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 213 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Tack, P. Bohy, I. Perlot, V. De Maertelaer, O. Alkeilani, S. Sourtzis, and P. A. Gevenois Suspected Acute Colon Diverticulitis: Imaging with Low-Dose Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 189 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Irie and H. Inoue Individual Modulation of the Tube Current-Seconds to Achieve Similar Levels of Image Noise in Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1514 - 1518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Remy-Jardin, A. Sobaszek, A. Duhamel, I. Mastora, C. Zanetti, and J. Remy Asbestos-related Pleuropulmonary Diseases: Evaluation with Low-Dose Four-Detector Row Spiral CT Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 182 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
X. Zhu, J. Yu, and Z. Huang Low-Dose Chest CT: Optimizing Radiation Protection for Patients Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 809 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Mayo, K.-I. Kim, S. L. S. MacDonald, T. Johkoh, P. Kavanagh, H. O. Coxson, and S. Vedal Reduced Radiation Dose Helical Chest CT: Effect on Reader Evaluation of Structures and Lung Findings Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 749 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Keyzer, D. Tack, V. de Maertelaer, P. Bohy, P. A. Gevenois, and D. Van Gansbeke Acute Appendicitis: Comparison of Low-Dose and Standard-Dose Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 164 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. K. Kalra, M. M. Maher, T. L. Toth, L. M. Hamberg, M. A. Blake, J.-A. Shepard, and S. Saini Strategies for CT Radiation Dose Optimization Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 619 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Heneghan, K. A. McGuire, R. A. Leder, D. M. DeLong, T. Yoshizumi, and R. C. Nelson Helical CT for Nephrolithiasis and Ureterolithiasis: Comparison of Conventional and Reduced Radiation-Dose Techniques Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 575 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Ko, H. Rusinek, E. L. Jacobs, J. S. Babb, M. Betke, G. McGuinness, and D. P. Naidich Small Pulmonary Nodules: Volume Measurement at Chest CT--Phantom Study Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 864 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Ko, H. Rusinek, D. P. Naidich, G. McGuinness, A. N. Rubinowitz, B. S. Leitman, and J. M. Martino Wavelet Compression of Low-Dose Chest CT Data: Effect on Lung Nodule Detection Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 70 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. G. Armato III, F. Li, M. L. Giger, H. MacMahon, S. Sone, and K. Doi Lung Cancer: Performance of Automated Lung Nodule Detection Applied to Cancers Missed in a CT Screening Program Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 685 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. K. Kalra, S. Prasad, S. Saini, M. A. Blake, J. Varghese, E. F. Halpern, J. T. Rhea, and J. H. Thrall Clinical Comparison of Standard-Dose and 50% Reduced--Dose Abdominal CT: Effect on Image Quality Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1101 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Itoh, M. Ikeda, Y. Mori, K. Suzuki, A. Sawaki, S. Iwano, H. Satake, S. Arahata, T. Isomura, M. Ozaki, et al. Lung: Feasibility of a Method for Changing Tube Current during Low-Dose Helical CT Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 905 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Prasad, C. Wittram, J.-A. Shepard, T. McLoud, and J. Rhea Standard-Dose and 50%--Reduced-Dose Chest CT: Comparing the Effect on Image Quality Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 461 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. Ravenel, E. M. Scalzetti, W. Huda, and W. Garrisi Radiation Exposure and Image Quality in Chest CT Examinations Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 279 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Haaga Radiation Dose Management: Weighing Risk Versus Benefit Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 289 - 291. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Huda, E. M. Scalzetti, and G. Levin Technique Factors and Image Quality as Functions of Patient Weight at Abdominal CT Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 430 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Boiselle, A. Ernst, and D. D. Karp Lung Cancer Detection in the 21st Century: Potential Contributions and Challenges of Emerging Technologies Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1215 - 1221. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Lucaya, J. Piqueras, P. Garcia-Pena, G. Enriquez, M. Garcia-Macias, and J. Sotil Low-Dose High-Resolution CT of the Chest in Children and Young Adults: Dose, Cooperation, Artifact Incidence, and Image Quality Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 985 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Itoh, M. Ikeda, S. Arahata, T. Kodaira, T. Isomura, T. Kato, K. Yamakawa, K. Maruyama, and T. Ishigaki Lung Cancer Screening: Minimum Tube Current Required for Helical CT Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 175 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Diederich, D. Wormanns, M. Semik, M. Thomas, H. Lenzen, N. Roos, and W. Heindel Screening for Early Lung Cancer with Low-Dose Spiral CT: Prevalence in 817 Asymptomatic Smokers Radiology, March 1, 2002; 222(3): 773 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |
