Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Langlotz, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Langlotz, C. P.

Radiology, Vol 209, 411-416, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Contrast media reactions and extravasation: relationship to intravenous injection rates

JE Jacobs, BA Birnbaum and CP Langlotz
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia 19104, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the belief that the frequencies of contrast material extravasation and minor, nonidiosyncratic contrast material reactions correlate with intravenous injection rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Complications of 6,660 consecutive injections of contrast material for computed tomography were prospectively recorded. Ionic (n = 4,851) or nonionic (n = 1,809) contrast material was injected at 0.5- 4.0 mL/sec. The injection rate was 1.9 mL/sec or less in group 1 (n = 2,899), 2.0-2.9 mL/sec in group 2 (n = 2,475), and 3.0-4.0 mL/sec in group 3 (n = 1,286). RESULTS: The extravasation rate (0.6%) did not differ significantly between the groups. The reaction rate (8.4%) also did not differ significantly between the groups. The rate of minor reactions (8.0%) was higher with ionic (9.9%) than nonionic (2.9%) contrast material (relative risk = 3.4). The rate of major reactions (0.4%) did not vary significantly with type of contrast material. The rate of nausea or vomiting (3.8%) did not differ significantly between the groups but was higher with ionic (4.9%) than nonionic (1.1%) contrast material (relative risk = 4.5). The rate of severe warmth (2.1%) was significantly higher in group 3 (2.8%) than group 1 (2.0%) or 2 (1.8%). CONCLUSION: No correlations exist between injection rate and extravasation rate or overall reaction rate.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. F. Behrendt, A. H. Mahnken, S. Stanzel, P. Seidensticker, E. Jost, R. W. Gunther, and G. Muhlenbruch
Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast Media Concentrations for Combined Abdominal and Thoracic MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 145 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. L. Wang, R. H. Cohan, J. H. Ellis, S. Adusumilli, and N. R. Dunnick
Frequency, Management, and Outcome of Extravasation of Nonionic Iodinated Contrast Medium in 69 657 Intravenous Injections
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 80 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. G. Amaral, J. Traubici, G. BenDavid, G. Reintamm, and A. Daneman
Safety of power injector use in children as measured by incidence of extravasation.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 580 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. Schima, R. Hammerstingl, C. Catalano, L. Marti-Bonmati, E. J. Rummeny, F. T. Montero, A. Dirisamer, B. Westermayer, M. Bellomi, D. Brisbois, et al.
Quadruple-phase MDCT of the liver in patients with suspected hepatocellular carcinoma: effect of contrast material flow rate.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1571 - 1579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S.-F. Ko, C.-C. Huang, S.-H. Ng, T.-Y. Lee, M.-J. Hsieh, F.-Y. Lee, M.-C. Chen, S.-M. Sheen-Chen, and C.-H. Lee
MDCT Angiography for Evaluation of the Complete Vascular Tree of Hemodialysis Fistulas
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1268 - 1274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Awai, M. Inoue, Y. Yagyu, M. Watanabe, T. Sano, S. Nin, R. Koike, Y. Nishimura, and Y. Yamashita
Moderate versus High Concentration of Contrast Material for Aortic and Hepatic Enhancement and Tumor-to-Liver Contrast at Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 682 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. T. Cochran, K. Bomyea, and J. W. Sayre
Trends in Adverse Events After IV Administration of Contrast Media
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2001; 176(6): 1385 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. A. Birnbaum, R. C. Nelson, J. L. Chezmar, and S. N. Glick
Extravasation Detection Accessory: Clinical Evaluation in 500 Patients
Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 431 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.