Radiology, Vol 209, 427-434, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Comparison of inversion-recovery gradient- and spin-echo and fast spin- echo techniques in the detection and characterization of liver lesions

ME Pijl, MN Wasser, EL van Persijn van Meerten, JW Gratama, CJ van de Velde, J Hermans, A Elevelt and JL Bloem
Dept of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.

PURPOSE: To compare respiratory-triggered inversion-recovery (IR) gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with respiratory-triggered T2-weighted fast spin-echo (SE) imaging in the diagnosis of liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, two radiologists independently identified focal hepatic lesions on respiratory-triggered IR GRASE and respiratory- triggered fast SE MR images in 28 consecutive patients with 186 (135 malignant and 51 benign) proved lesions. A combination of findings at surgery, intraoperative ultrasonography (US), and histologic examination served as the standard of reference. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were obtained from 86 lesions larger than 10 mm. RESULTS: The sensitivity in the detection of liver metastases was, independent of lesion size and observer, higher for IR GRASE imaging (55%) than for fast SE imaging (44%-50%) (observer 1, P = .014; observer 2, P = .21). Confidence levels with IR GRASE imaging were higher, but not significantly so, than those with fast SE imaging (P < .098). Both observers characterized liver lesions better with IR GRASE than with fast SE imaging (observer 1, P = .04; observer 2, P = .48). The metastasis-liver CNR was significantly higher (P = .012) with IR GRASE imaging. CONCLUSION: The respiratory-triggered IR GRASE sequence is a fast alternative to the respiratory-triggered fast SE sequence in the evaluation of suspected liver metastases.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Bipat, M. S. van Leeuwen, E. F. I. Comans, M. E. J. Pijl, P. M. M. Bossuyt, A. H. Zwinderman, and J. Stoker Colorectal Liver Metastases: CT, MR Imaging, and PET for Diagnosis--Meta-analysis Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 123 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. van Erkel, M. E. J. Pijl, A. A. van den Berg-Huysmans, M. N. J. M. Wasser, C. J. H. van de Velde, and J. L. Bloem Hepatic Metastases in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Relationship between Size of Metastases, Standard of Reference, and Detection Rates Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 404 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kanematsu, H. Hoshi, M. N. J. M. Wasser, M. E. J. Pijl, E. L. van Persijn van Meerten, J.-W. C. Gratama, and J. L. Bloem Can Inversion-Recovery Gradient- and Spin-Echo T2-weighted MR Imaging Be an Alternative to Fast Spin-Echo Imaging with Fat Suppression? • Dr Wasser and colleagues respond: Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 291 - 291. [Full Text]