Radiology, Vol 209, 483-489, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Diaphragmatic and cardiac motion during suspended breathing: preliminary experience and implications for breath-hold MR imaging

AE Holland, JW Goldfarb and RR Edelman
Department of Radiology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

PURPOSE: To investigate and quantify motion of the diaphragm and heart during suspended breathing at end inspiration and end expiration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 10 healthy adult volunteers, line scanning was performed to monitor the position of the diaphragm during a breath hold at end inspiration and end expiration, with a spatial and temporal resolution of 0.25 mm and 200 msec, respectively. Electrocardiographically gated, turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed to monitor movement of the diaphragm and heart. RESULTS: During a breath hold, the diaphragm moved upward. At end expiration, the velocity of the diaphragm during suspended breathing was constant (mean, 0.15 mm/sec). At end inspiration, motion of the diaphragm during suspended breathing was more complex (range, 0.1-7.9 mm/sec). During a 20-second breath hold, mean displacement of the diaphragm was 25% of that during normal breathing. FLASH MR imaging revealed variations in the position of the heart during a breath hold. During suspended respiration, the heart did not return to the same position on consecutive heartbeats and, consequently, the margins of the heart typically moved inward. CONCLUSION: Breath holding does not eliminate motion of the diaphragm. Changes in the motion of the diaphragm and transthoracic pressure during a breath hold result in complex movement of the heart and may cause blurring during breath-hold MR imaging.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. M. Israel and M. A. Bosniak Pitfalls in Renal Mass Evaluation and How to Avoid Them RadioGraphics, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 1325 - 1338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Jahnke, I. Paetsch, S. Achenbach, B. Schnackenburg, R. Gebker, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel Coronary MR Imaging: Breath-hold Capability and Patterns, Coronary Artery Rest Periods, and {beta}-Blocker Use Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 71 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Israel and M. A. Bosniak How I Do It: Evaluating Renal Masses Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 441 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Hecht, G. M. Israel, G. A. Krinsky, W. Y. Hahn, D. C. Kim, I. Belitskaya-Levy, and V. S. Lee Renal Masses: Quantitative Analysis of Enhancement with Signal Intensity Measurements versus Qualitative Analysis of Enhancement with Image Subtraction for Diagnosing Malignancy at MR Imaging Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 373 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. S. Lee, J. N. Morgan, A. G. S. Tan, P. V. Pandharipande, G. A. Krinsky, J. A. Barker, C. Lo, and J. C. Weinreb Celiac Artery Compression by the Median Arcuate Ligament: A Pitfall of End-expiratory MR Imaging Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 437 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Pitman, V. Kalff, B. Van Every, B. Risa, L. R. Barnden, and M. J. Kelly Effect of Mechanically Simulated Diaphragmatic Respiratory Motion on Myocardial SPECT Processed With and Without Attenuation Correction J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2002; 43(9): 1259 - 1267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Schalla, C. Klein, I. Paetsch, H. Lehmkuhl, A. Bornstedt, B. Schnackenburg, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel Real-Time MR Image Acquisition during High-Dose Dobutamine Hydrochloride Stress for Detecting Left Ventricular Wall-Motion Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Arterial Disease Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 845 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N.L. Muller Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: past, present and future Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 3S - 12s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Polak MR Coronary Angiography: Are We There Yet? Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 649 - 650. [Full Text]