Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gollub, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Castellino, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gollub, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Castellino, R. A.
(Radiology. 1999;210:109-112.)
© RSNA, 1999


Health Policy and Practice

Clinical Importance of Reinterpretation of Body CT Scans Obtained Elsewhere in Patients Referred for Care at a Tertiary Cancer Center

Marc J. Gollub, MD1, David M. Panicek, MD1, Ariadne M. Bach, MD1, Angelica Penalver, BS1 and Ronald A. Castellino, MD1

1 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency and clinical importance of discordance between the initial interpretation of computed tomographic (CT) scans of the body and subsequent interpretations in patients with biopsy-proved cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The initial and reinterpretation reports for 213 CT scans of the body submitted for official review were compared independently by two radiologists. Sixty-nine sets of reports were excluded because the reviewing radiologists and the outside radiologists had prior CT scans from differing dates to use for comparison. One set of reports was excluded because of lack of clinical follow-up.

RESULTS: The interpretations were graded as "agree" in 90 patients (63%), "major disagreement" in 24 patients (17%), and "minor disagreement" in 29 patients (20%). A theoretic change in treatment could have occurred in nine of 53 cases of disagreement (17%). An actual change in treatment occurred in five of 53 cases of disagreement (9%).

CONCLUSION: Discordant interpretations were frequent (53 of 143 cases [37%]), were often major (24 of 143 cases [17%]), and resulted in actual treatment changes in five of all 143 cases (3%). Reinterpretation of body CT scans can have a substantial effect on the clinical care of individual patients with proved malignancy.

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), clinical effectiveness • Diagnostic radiology, observer performance • Images, interpretation • Radiology and radiologists, outcomes studies




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. Siewert, J. Sosna, A. McNamara, V. Raptopoulos, and J. B. Kruskal
Quality Initiatives: Missed Lesions at Abdominal Oncologic CT: Lessons Learned from Quality Assurance
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 623 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. B. Ruchman, J. Jaeger, E. F. Wiggins III, S. Seinfeld, V. Thakral, S. Bolla, and S. Wallach
Preliminary Radiology Resident Interpretations Versus Final Attending Radiologist Interpretations and the Impact on Patient Care in a Community Hospital
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 523 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. Peldschus, P. Herzog, S. A. Wood, J. I. Cheema, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
Computer-Aided Diagnosis as a Second Reader: Spectrum of Findings in CT Studies of the Chest Interpreted as Normal
Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1517 - 1523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Berlin
Potential Legal Ramifications of Whole-Body CT Screening: Taking a Peek into Pandora's Box
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 317 - 322.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
L. A. Loevner, A. I. Sonners, B. J. Schulman, K. Slawek, R. S. Weber, D. I. Rosenthal, G. Moonis, and A. A. Chalian
Reinterpretation of Cross-Sectional Images in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer in the Setting of a Multidisciplinary Cancer Center
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2002; 23(10): 1622 - 1626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. J. White Jr, M. J. Gollub, D. M. Panicek, A. M. Bach, and R. A. Castellino
CT Reinterpretation • Dr Gollub and colleagues respond:
Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 601a - 601.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Radiological Society of North America.