|
|
||||||||
Gastrointestinal Imaging |
1 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 (L.H.S., E.J.G., S.M.C., M.C.E., D.M.P.)
2 Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY (L.H.S., E.J.G., D.M.P.).
PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of small hepatic lesions discovered at computed tomography (CT) in patients with cancer and to determine the frequency with which they represent clinically important findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors reviewed the CT reports obtained in 2,978 patients with cancer during a 24-month period. Small hepatic lesions (lesions 1 cm or less in diameter or deemed too small to characterize by the interpreting radiologist) noted on the initial scan were assessed at follow-up CT. The number and type of any other intrahepatic lesion, the histologic type of the primary tumor, and the presence of extrahepatic metastatic disease were also recorded.
RESULTS: Small hepatic lesions were reported in 378 (12.7%) patients; 15 (4.0%) of these patients also reportedly had other larger hepatic lesions that were interpreted as metastases. Small hepatic lesions demonstrated interval growth in 44 (11.6%) patients and were therefore considered metastatic. Small hepatic lesions in 303 (80.2%) patients demonstrated no interval growth (mean follow-up, 25.6 months; range, 656 months) and were therefore presumed benign. Small hepatic lesions in 31 (8.2%) patients were stable at follow-up of less than 6 months and were considered indeterminate. Among the three most common tumors (lymphoma and colorectal and breast cancers), small hepatic lesions were metastatic in 4%, 14%, and 22%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Although small hepatic lesions in patients with cancer more frequently are benign than malignant, these lesions represent metastases in 11.6% of patients.
Index terms: Liver, CT, 761.12112 Liver, cysts, 761.3121 Liver neoplasms, 761.31, 761.32, 761.33 Liver neoplasms, CT, 761.12112 Liver neoplasms, metastases, 761.33
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D.-M. Koh, G. Brown, Z. Meer, A. R. Norman, and J. E. Husband Diagnostic Accuracy of Rim and Segmental MRI Enhancement of Colorectal Hepatic Metastasis After Administration of Mangafodipir Trisodium Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): W154 - W161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Patterson, H. I. Khalil, and D. M. Panicek MRI evaluation of small hepatic lesions in women with breast cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 307 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Leen, P. Ceccotti, C. Kalogeropoulou, W. J. Angerson, S. J. Moug, and P. G. Horgan Prospective multicenter trial evaluating a novel method of characterizing focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography. Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1551 - 1559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. I. Khalil, S. A. Patterson, and D. M. Panicek Hepatic Lesions Deemed Too Small to Characterize at CT: Prevalence and Importance in Women with Breast Cancer Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 872 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hur, M.-S. Park, J.-S. Yu, J.-S. Lim, S. W. Hong, and K. W. Kim Focal Eosinophilic Necrosis Versus Metastasis in the Liver: The Usefulness of Two-Phase Dynamic CT Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1085 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Krakora, F. V. Coakley, G. Williams, B. M. Yeh, R. S. Breiman, and A. Qayyum Small Hypoattenuating Hepatic Lesions at Contrast-enhanced CT: Prognostic Importance in Patients with Breast Cancer Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 667 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. W. Kim, A. Y. Kim, T. K. Kim, S. H. Park, H. J. Kim, Y. K. Lee, M.-S. Park, H. K. Ha, P. N. Kim, J. C. Kim, et al. Small (l.e. 2cm) Hepatic Lesions in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Detection and Characterization on Mangafodipir Trisodium-Enhanced MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1233 - 1240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P J Robinson, P Arnold, and D Wilson Small "indeterminate" lesions on CT of the liver: a follow-up study of stability Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(912): 866 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Eberhardt, P. H. Choi, A. M. Bach, S. A. Funt, H. E. Felderman, and L. E. Hann Utility of Sonography for Small Hepatic Lesions Found on Computed Tomography in Patients With Cancer J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2003; 22(4): 335 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Mueller, H. K. Hussain, R. C. Carlos, H. V. Nghiem, and I. R. Francis Effectiveness of MR Imaging in Characterizing Small Hepatic Lesions: Routine Versus Expert Interpretation Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2003; 180(3): 673 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T H Saunders, H K Mendes Ribeiro, and F V Gleeson New techniques for imaging colorectal cancer: the use of MRI, PET and radioimmunoscintigraphy for primary staging and follow-up Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2002; 64(1): 81 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Haider, M. M. Amitai, D. C. Rappaport, M. E. O'Malley, A. E. Hanbidge, M. Redston, G. A. Lockwood, and S. Gallinger Multi-Detector Row Helical CT in Preoperative Assessment of Small (<=1.5 cm) Liver Metastases: Is Thinner Collimation Better? Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 137 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W H Allum, S M Griffin, A Watson, and D Colin-Jones Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer Gut, June 1, 2002; 50 (2007): v1 - v23. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |