Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Panicek, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Panicek, D. M.
(Radiology. 1999;210:71-74.)
© RSNA, 1999


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Prevalence and Importance of Small Hepatic Lesions Found at CT in Patients with Cancer

Lawrence H. Schwartz, MD1,2, Eric J. Gandras, MD1,2, Sandra M. Colangelo, MD1, Matthew C. Ercolani, BS1 and David M. Panicek, MD1,2

1 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 (L.H.S., E.J.G., S.M.C., M.C.E., D.M.P.)
2 Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY (L.H.S., E.J.G., D.M.P.).

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of small hepatic lesions discovered at computed tomography (CT) in patients with cancer and to determine the frequency with which they represent clinically important findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors reviewed the CT reports obtained in 2,978 patients with cancer during a 24-month period. Small hepatic lesions (lesions 1 cm or less in diameter or deemed too small to characterize by the interpreting radiologist) noted on the initial scan were assessed at follow-up CT. The number and type of any other intrahepatic lesion, the histologic type of the primary tumor, and the presence of extrahepatic metastatic disease were also recorded.

RESULTS: Small hepatic lesions were reported in 378 (12.7%) patients; 15 (4.0%) of these patients also reportedly had other larger hepatic lesions that were interpreted as metastases. Small hepatic lesions demonstrated interval growth in 44 (11.6%) patients and were therefore considered metastatic. Small hepatic lesions in 303 (80.2%) patients demonstrated no interval growth (mean follow-up, 25.6 months; range, 6–56 months) and were therefore presumed benign. Small hepatic lesions in 31 (8.2%) patients were stable at follow-up of less than 6 months and were considered indeterminate. Among the three most common tumors (lymphoma and colorectal and breast cancers), small hepatic lesions were metastatic in 4%, 14%, and 22%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Although small hepatic lesions in patients with cancer more frequently are benign than malignant, these lesions represent metastases in 11.6% of patients.

Index terms: Liver, CT, 761.12112 • Liver, cysts, 761.3121 • Liver neoplasms, 761.31, 761.32, 761.33 • Liver neoplasms, CT, 761.12112 • Liver neoplasms, metastases, 761.33




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D.-M. Koh, G. Brown, Z. Meer, A. R. Norman, and J. E. Husband
Diagnostic Accuracy of Rim and Segmental MRI Enhancement of Colorectal Hepatic Metastasis After Administration of Mangafodipir Trisodium
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): W154 - W161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. A. Patterson, H. I. Khalil, and D. M. Panicek
MRI evaluation of small hepatic lesions in women with breast cancer.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 307 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Leen, P. Ceccotti, C. Kalogeropoulou, W. J. Angerson, S. J. Moug, and P. G. Horgan
Prospective multicenter trial evaluating a novel method of characterizing focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1551 - 1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. I. Khalil, S. A. Patterson, and D. M. Panicek
Hepatic Lesions Deemed Too Small to Characterize at CT: Prevalence and Importance in Women with Breast Cancer
Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 872 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Hur, M.-S. Park, J.-S. Yu, J.-S. Lim, S. W. Hong, and K. W. Kim
Focal Eosinophilic Necrosis Versus Metastasis in the Liver: The Usefulness of Two-Phase Dynamic CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1085 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. A. Krakora, F. V. Coakley, G. Williams, B. M. Yeh, R. S. Breiman, and A. Qayyum
Small Hypoattenuating Hepatic Lesions at Contrast-enhanced CT: Prognostic Importance in Patients with Breast Cancer
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 667 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. W. Kim, A. Y. Kim, T. K. Kim, S. H. Park, H. J. Kim, Y. K. Lee, M.-S. Park, H. K. Ha, P. N. Kim, J. C. Kim, et al.
Small (l.e. 2cm) Hepatic Lesions in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Detection and Characterization on Mangafodipir Trisodium-Enhanced MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1233 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P J Robinson, P Arnold, and D Wilson
Small "indeterminate" lesions on CT of the liver: a follow-up study of stability
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(912): 866 - 874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. C. Eberhardt, P. H. Choi, A. M. Bach, S. A. Funt, H. E. Felderman, and L. E. Hann
Utility of Sonography for Small Hepatic Lesions Found on Computed Tomography in Patients With Cancer
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2003; 22(4): 335 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. C. Mueller, H. K. Hussain, R. C. Carlos, H. V. Nghiem, and I. R. Francis
Effectiveness of MR Imaging in Characterizing Small Hepatic Lesions: Routine Versus Expert Interpretation
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2003; 180(3): 673 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
T H Saunders, H K Mendes Ribeiro, and F V Gleeson
New techniques for imaging colorectal cancer: the use of MRI, PET and radioimmunoscintigraphy for primary staging and follow-up
Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2002; 64(1): 81 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. A. Haider, M. M. Amitai, D. C. Rappaport, M. E. O'Malley, A. E. Hanbidge, M. Redston, G. A. Lockwood, and S. Gallinger
Multi-Detector Row Helical CT in Preoperative Assessment of Small (<=1.5 cm) Liver Metastases: Is Thinner Collimation Better?
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 137 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
W H Allum, S M Griffin, A Watson, and D Colin-Jones
Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer
Gut, June 1, 2002; 50 (2007): v1 - v23.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Radiological Society of North America.