Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tublin, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by McGovern, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tublin, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by McGovern, P. C.
(Radiology. 1999;210:97-101.)
© RSNA, 1999


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Effect of Injection Rate of Contrast Medium on Pancreatic and Hepatic Helical CT

Mitchell E. Tublin, MD1, Franklin N. Tessler, MD, CM1, Sam L. Cheng, MD1, Terry L. Peters, MS1 and Patricia C. McGovern, CRT1

1 Department of Radiology, A113, Albany Medical Center, 43 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY 12208.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of the injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic enhancement at abdominal helical computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four contrast medium–enhanced abdominal helical CT scans (64 adult patients) were obtained with 150 mL of contrast medium. The injection rate was 2.5 mL/sec for the first 32 scans and 5.0 mL/sec for the remaining 32. Scans were obtained at 5-sec intervals, with an intermediate 8-sec breathing interval. Hepatic and pancreatic enhancement levels were measured and averaged, and time-attenuation curves were plotted for both groups. Differences in weight, age, time to peak pancreatic and hepatic enhancement, and peak enhancement were assessed with the Student t test.

RESULTS: Both peak enhancement and time to peak enhancement were significantly different between the two injection rates (P <= .002), with faster, more intense hepatic and pancreatic enhancement at the higher rate. At 2.5 mL/sec, the pancreas reached a peak attenuation level of 65 HU at 69 sec, and the liver reached a peak of 58 HU at 87 sec. At 5.0 mL/sec, the pancreas reached a peak attenuation of 84 HU at 43 sec, and the liver reached a peak of 75 HU at 63 sec.

CONCLUSION: Absolute values for and times to peak pancreatic and hepatic enhancement are directly related to the contrast medium injection rate.

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), helical, 761.12115, 770.12115 • Liver, CT, 761.12112, 761.12114, 761.12115 • Pancreas, CT, 770.12112, 770.12114, 770.12115




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
X. Ma, A. E. Samir, N.-S. Holalkere, and D. V. Sahani
Optimal Arterial Phase Imaging for Detection of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma Determined by Continuous Image Capture on 16-MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 772 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, Y. Tamura, M. Hatemura, and Y. Yamashita
Pancreas: Patient Body Weight tailored Contrast Material Injection Protocol versus Fixed Dose Protocol at Dynamic CT
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 475 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Kondo, M. Kanematsu, S. Goshima, T. Miyoshi, Y. Shiratori, M. Onozuka, N. Moriyama, and K. T. Bae
MDCT of the Pancreas: Optimizing Scanning Delay with a Bolus-Tracking Technique for Pancreatic, Peripancreatic Vascular, and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 751 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Schueller, W. Schima, C. Schueller-Weidekamm, M. Weber, A. Stift, M. Gnant, and R. Prokesch
Multidetector CT of Pancreas: Effects of Contrast Material Flow Rate and Individualized Scan Delay on Enhancement of Pancreas and Tumor Contrast
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 441 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Goshima, M. Kanematsu, H. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, T. Miyoshi, H. Kato, Y. Tsuge, Y. Shiratori, H. Hoshi, M. Onozuka, et al.
Pancreas: Optimal Scan Delay for Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 167 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Itoh, H. Fukushima, A. Takada, K. Suzuki, H. Satake, and T. Ishigaki
Assessment of anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction with high-resolution multiplanar reformatted images in MDCT.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 668 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Itoh, M. Ikeda, H. Satake, T. Ota, and T. Ishigaki
The effect of patient age on contrast enhancement during CT of the pancreatobiliary region.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 505 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Goshima, M. Kanematsu, H. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, T. Miyoshi, H. Nishibori, H. Kato, H. Hoshi, M. Onozuka, and N. Moriyama
MDCT of the liver and hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: optimizing scan delays for bolus-tracking techniques of hepatic arterial and portal venous phases.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): W25 - W32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Ichikawa, H. Nakajima, A. Nanbu, M. Hori, and T. Araki
Effect of Injection Rate of Contrast Material on CT of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186(5): 1413 - 1418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M.-J. Kim, Y. E. Chung, K. W. Kim, J.-J. Chung, J. S. Lim, Y. T. Oh, and J. H. Kim
Variation of the Time to Aortic Enhancement of Fixed-Duration Versus Fixed-Rate Injection Protocols
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 185 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Imbriaco
Reply
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 267 - 267.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. M. Erturk
Value of the Single-Phase Technique in MDCT Assessment of Pancreatic Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 266 - 267.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Imbriaco, A. J. Megibow, A. Ragozzino, R. Liuzzi, P. Mainenti, S. Bortone, L. Camera, and M. Salvatore
Value of the Single-Phase Technique in MDCT Assessment of Pancreatic Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1111 - 1117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S Fenchel, T R Fleiter, A J Aschoff, R van Gessel, H-J Brambs, and E M Merkle
Effect of iodine concentration of contrast media on contrast enhancement in multislice CT of the pancreas
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2004; 77(922): 821 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. L. Bronstein, E. M. Loyer, H. Kaur, H. Choi, C. David, R. A. DuBrow, L. D. Broemeling, K. R. Cleary, and C. Charnsangavej
Detection of Small Pancreatic Tumors with Multiphasic Helical CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2004; 182(3): 619 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. G. Fletcher, M. J. Wiersema, M. A. Farrell, J. L. Fidler, L. J. Burgart, T. Koyama, C. D. Johnson, D. H. Stephens, E. M. Ward, and W. S. Harmsen
Pancreatic Malignancy: Value of Arterial, Pancreatic, and Hepatic Phase Imaging with Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 81 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Nakamoto, B. B. Chin, D. L. Kraitchman, L. P. Lawler, L. T. Marshall, and R. L. Wahl
Effects of Nonionic Intravenous Contrast Agents at PET/CT Imaging: Phantom and Canine Studies
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 817 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I. R. Francis, R. H. Cohan, N. J. McNulty, J. F. Platt, M. Korobkin, A. Gebremariam, and K. Ragupathi
Multidetector CT of the Liver and Hepatic Neoplasms: Effect of Multiphasic Imaging on Tumor Conspicuity and Vascular Enhancement
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1217 - 1224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, C. Charnsangavej, and D. B. Evans
Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance of Pancreatic Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1311 - 1323.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. K. Hussain, F. J. Londy, I. R. Francis, H. V. Nghiem, W. J. Weadock, A. Gebremariam, and T. L. Chenevert
Hepatic Arterial Phase MR Imaging with Automated Bolus-Detection Three-dimensional Fast Gradient-Recalled-Echo Sequence: Comparison with Test-Bolus Method
Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 558 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Kanematsu, R. C. Semelka, M. Matsuo, H. Kondo, M. Enya, S. Goshima, N. Moriyama, and H. Hoshi
Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging of the Liver: Optimizing Imaging Delay for Hepatic Arterial and Portal Venous Phases—A Prospective Randomized Study in Patients with Chronic Liver Damage
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 407 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Ichikawa, T. Kitamura, H. Nakajima, H. Sou, T. Tsukamoto, S. Ikenaga, and T. Araki
Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Can Double Arterial Phase Imaging with Multidetector CT Improve Tumor Depiction in the Cirrhotic Liver?
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2002; 179(3): 751 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. D. Johnson
Pancreatic Carcinoma: Developing a Protocol for Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 3 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. J. McNulty, I. R. Francis, J. F. Platt, R. H. Cohan, M. Korobkin, and A. Gebremariam
Multi-Detector Row Helical CT of the Pancreas: Effect of Contrast-enhanced Multiphasic Imaging on Enhancement of the Pancreas, Peripancreatic Vasculature, and Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 97 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Megibow, G. Jacob, J. P. Heiken, E. K. Paulson, K. D. Hopper, G. Sica, S. Saini, B. A. Birnbaum, R. Redvanley, and E. K. Fishman
Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Volume of Low Osmolality Contrast Medium Needed for Routine Helical Abdominal CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 583 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Yamashita, Y. Komohara, M. Takahashi, M. Uchida, N. Hayabuchi, T. Shimizu, and I. Narabayashi
Abdominal Helical CT: Evaluation of Optimal Doses of Intravenous Contrast Material-A Prospective Randomized Study
Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 718 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Kanematsu, Y. Shiratori, H. Hoshi, H. Kondo, M. Matsuo, and H. Moriwaki
Pancreas and Peripancreatic Vessels: Effect of Imaging Delay on Gadolinium Enhancement at Dynamic Gradient-Recalled-Echo MR Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 95 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Radiological Society of North America.