Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Baere, T.
Right arrow Articles by Roche, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Baere, T.
Right arrow Articles by Roche, A.
(Radiology. 1999;210:651-654.)
© RSNA, 1999


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Percutaneous Gastrostomy with Fluoroscopic Guidance: Single-Center Experience in 500 Consecutive Cancer Patients

Thierry de Baere, MD1, René Chapot, MD1, Viseth Kuoch, MD1, Patrick Chevallier, MD1, Jean Paul Delille, MD1, Christian Domenge, MD2, Guy Schwaab, MD2 and Alain Roche, MD1

1 Departments of Interventional Radiology (T.d.B., R.C., V.K., P.C., J.P.D., A.R.)
2 Head and Neck Surgery (C.D., G.S.), Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, complications, adequacy of feeding support, and tolerability of fluoroscopically guided gastrostomy in cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred cancer patients were referred for fluoroscopically guided gastrostomy, among whom percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was contraindicated or had been unsuccessful in approximately one-fourth. Five hundred eight fluoroscopically guided gastrostomies with T-fastener gastropexy were performed in 496 patients. The procedure was unsuccessful in four patients, and 12 patients needed a second gastrostomy.

RESULTS: Fluoroscopically guided gastrostomy was feasible in 99% of patients. During the first 30 postprocedure days, there were seven major complications (1.4%): cardiac failure (n = 1), hemorrhage (n = 1), and peritonitis (n = 5); one patient died of peritonitis. No major complications occurred after the 30th postprocedure day. There were 27 minor complications (5.4%) during the first 30 postprocedure days and 88 (17.6%) thereafter. Long-term minor complications mainly involved tube disturbances and nearly always resolved once the tube was exchanged. Such exchanges were easily performed under fluoroscopic guidance except in two patients, who required repeat fluoroscopically guided gastrostomy.

CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopically guided gastrostomy is highly feasible and safe and provides adequate feeding support, even when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is impossible. Long-term complications, which are mainly tube disturbances, are easily treated.

Index terms: Gastrointestinal tract, interventional procedure, 72.1269 • Gastrostomy, 72.1269 • Stomach, interventional procedure, 72.1269




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
G. Wolch
To the Editor:
Nutr Clin Pract, December 1, 2007; 22(6): 689 - 690.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. L. Nosher, L. J. Bodner, W. S. Girgis, R. Brolin, R. L. Siegel, and C. Gribbin
Percutaneous Gastrostomy for Treating Dilatation of the Bypassed Stomach After Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1431 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
H-P Dinkel, K T Beer, P Zbaren, and J Triller
Establishing radiological percutaneous gastrostomy with balloon-retained tubes as an alternative to endoscopic and surgical gastrostomy in patients with tumours of the head and neck or oesophagus
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2002; 75(892): 371 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Funaki, R. Peirce, J. Lorenz, P. B. Menocci, J. D. Rosenblum, C. Straus, T. V. Ha, J. A. Leef, and G. X. Zaleski
Comparison of Balloon- and Mushroom-Retained Large-Bore Gastrostomy Catheters
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 359 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Funaki, G. X. Zaleski, J. Lorenz, P. B. Menocci, A. N. Funaki, J. D. Rosenblum, C. Straus, and J. A. Leef
Radiologic Gastrostomy Placement: Pigtail- Versus Mushroom-Retained Catheters
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 375 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. Shingadia, R. M. Viani, R. Yogev, H. Binns, W. M. Dankner, S. A. Spector, and E. G. Chadwick
Gastrostomy Tube Insertion for Improvement of Adherence to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy in Pediatric Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Pediatrics, June 1, 2000; 105(6): 80e - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. P. Brady, T. de Baere, R. Chapot, V. Kuoch, P. Chevallier, J. P. Delille, C. Domenge, G. Schwaab, and A. Roche
Percutaneous Gastrostomy: US Guidance for Gastric Puncture • Dr de Baere and colleagues respond:
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 303 - 304.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Radiological Society of North America.