|
|
||||||||
Vascular and Interventional Radiology |
1 Departments of Interventional Radiology (T.d.B., R.C., V.K., P.C., J.P.D., A.R.)
2 Head and Neck Surgery (C.D., G.S.), Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, complications, adequacy of feeding support, and tolerability of fluoroscopically guided gastrostomy in cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred cancer patients were referred for fluoroscopically guided gastrostomy, among whom percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was contraindicated or had been unsuccessful in approximately one-fourth. Five hundred eight fluoroscopically guided gastrostomies with T-fastener gastropexy were performed in 496 patients. The procedure was unsuccessful in four patients, and 12 patients needed a second gastrostomy.
RESULTS: Fluoroscopically guided gastrostomy was feasible in 99% of patients. During the first 30 postprocedure days, there were seven major complications (1.4%): cardiac failure (n = 1), hemorrhage (n = 1), and peritonitis (n = 5); one patient died of peritonitis. No major complications occurred after the 30th postprocedure day. There were 27 minor complications (5.4%) during the first 30 postprocedure days and 88 (17.6%) thereafter. Long-term minor complications mainly involved tube disturbances and nearly always resolved once the tube was exchanged. Such exchanges were easily performed under fluoroscopic guidance except in two patients, who required repeat fluoroscopically guided gastrostomy.
CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopically guided gastrostomy is highly feasible and safe and provides adequate feeding support, even when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is impossible. Long-term complications, which are mainly tube disturbances, are easily treated.
Index terms: Gastrointestinal tract, interventional procedure, 72.1269 Gastrostomy, 72.1269 Stomach, interventional procedure, 72.1269
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Wolch To the Editor: Nutr Clin Pract, December 1, 2007; 22(6): 689 - 690. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Nosher, L. J. Bodner, W. S. Girgis, R. Brolin, R. L. Siegel, and C. Gribbin Percutaneous Gastrostomy for Treating Dilatation of the Bypassed Stomach After Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1431 - 1435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H-P Dinkel, K T Beer, P Zbaren, and J Triller Establishing radiological percutaneous gastrostomy with balloon-retained tubes as an alternative to endoscopic and surgical gastrostomy in patients with tumours of the head and neck or oesophagus Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2002; 75(892): 371 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Funaki, R. Peirce, J. Lorenz, P. B. Menocci, J. D. Rosenblum, C. Straus, T. V. Ha, J. A. Leef, and G. X. Zaleski Comparison of Balloon- and Mushroom-Retained Large-Bore Gastrostomy Catheters Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 359 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Funaki, G. X. Zaleski, J. Lorenz, P. B. Menocci, A. N. Funaki, J. D. Rosenblum, C. Straus, and J. A. Leef Radiologic Gastrostomy Placement: Pigtail- Versus Mushroom-Retained Catheters Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 375 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Shingadia, R. M. Viani, R. Yogev, H. Binns, W. M. Dankner, S. A. Spector, and E. G. Chadwick Gastrostomy Tube Insertion for Improvement of Adherence to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy in Pediatric Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pediatrics, June 1, 2000; 105(6): 80e - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Brady, T. de Baere, R. Chapot, V. Kuoch, P. Chevallier, J. P. Delille, C. Domenge, G. Schwaab, and A. Roche Percutaneous Gastrostomy: US Guidance for Gastric Puncture • Dr de Baere and colleagues respond: Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 303 - 304. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |