Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Filly, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Filly, R. A.
(Radiology. 1999;210:739-745.)
© RSNA, 1999


Genitourinary Imaging

Endometriomas: Diagnostic Performance of US

Maitray D. Patel, MD1, Vickie A. Feldstein, MD1, Dillon C. Chen, MD1, Scott D. Lipson, MD1 and Roy A. Filly, MD1

1 Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco.

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic performance of specific ultrasonographic (US) features in discriminating endometriomas from other adnexal masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two sonologists independently reviewed the sonograms of 252 adnexal masses in 226 women and recorded US features by using a standardized checklist. The diagnostic performance of specific US features and overall reviewer impression in discriminating endometriomas from other adnexal masses were evaluated.

RESULTS: There were 40 endometriomas. Diffuse low-level internal echoes were present in 38 (95%) endometriomas and 40 (19%) nonendometriomas (positive likelihood ratio, 5). The positive likelihood ratio for the diagnosis of endometrioma increased to 8 if masses with neoplastic features at gray-scale US were excluded, allowing identification of 30 endometriomas (75%). The presence of multilocularity or hyperechoic wall foci further increased the positive likelihood ratio to 48, allowing the identification of 18 endometriomas (45%).

CONCLUSION: An adnexal mass with diffuse low-level internal echoes and absence of particular neoplastic features is highly likely to be an endometrioma if multilocularity or hyperechoic wall foci are present. A patient with a mass with diffuse low-level internal echoes and other US features may benefit from additional imaging.

Index terms: Dermoid, 85.313 • Endometriosis, 85.3192 • Ovary, neoplasms, 852.31, 852.319, 852.32 • Pelvic organs, abnormalities, 85.1493 • Pelvic organs, diseases, 85.2172 • Pelvic organs, neoplasms, 85.31, 85.32 • Pelvic organs, US, 85.1298




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
S Ghattamaneni, M J Weston, and J A Spencer
Imaging in endometriosis
Imaging, December 1, 2007; 19(4): 345 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
E. Asch and D. Levine
Variations in Appearance of Endometriomas
J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2007; 26(8): 993 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
K. A. Jain
Endometrioma with calcification simulating a dermoid on sonography.
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2006; 25(9): 1237 - 1241.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. I. Lee
Imaging Evaluation of Adnexal Masses: Self-Assessment Module
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3_Supplement): S457 - S459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. D. Patel, D. L. Acord, and S. W. Young
Likelihood ratio of sonographic findings in discriminating hydrosalpinx from other adnexal masses.
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1033 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Kitawaki, H. Ishihara, H. Koshiba, M. Kiyomizu, M. Teramoto, Y. Kitaoka, and H. Honjo
Usefulness and limits of CA-125 in diagnosis of endometriosis without associated ovarian endometriomas
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1999 - 2003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. D. Patel, V. A. Feldstein, and R. A. Filly
The Likelihood Ratio of Sonographic Findings for the Diagnosis of Hemorrhagic Ovarian Cysts
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2005; 24(5): 607 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. Clarke, A. Edwards, and K. Pollard
Acoustic Streaming in Ovarian Cysts
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2005; 24(5): 617 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.D. de Kroon, H.A.G.M. van der Sandt, J.C. van Houwelingen, and F.W. Jansen
Sonographic assessment of non-malignant ovarian cysts: does sonohistology exist?
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2138 - 2143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. L. Brown, M. C. Frates, M. G. Muto, and W. R. Welch
Small Echogenic Foci in the Ovaries: Correlation With Histologic Findings
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2004; 23(2): 307 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
I. Imaoka, A. Wada, M. Matsuo, M. Yoshida, H. Kitagaki, and K. Sugimura
MR Imaging of Disorders Associated with Female Infertility: Use in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1401 - 1421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
N. M. Reddy, K. A. Jain, and E. O. Gerscovich
A Degenerating Cystic Uterine Fibroid Mimicking an Endometrioma on Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2003; 22(9): 973 - 976.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bazot, R. Detchev, A. Cortez, P. Amouyal, S. Uzan, and E. Darai
Transvaginal sonography and rectal endoscopic sonography for the assessment of pelvic endometriosis: a preliminary comparison
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2003; 18(8): 1686 - 1692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J A Spencer and M J Weston
Imaging in endometriosis
Imaging, June 1, 2003; 15(2): 63 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
P. L. Williams, S. L. Laifer-Narin, and N. Ragavendra
US of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2003; 23(3): 703 - 718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. L. Bennett, C. M. Slywotzky, and G. Giovanniello
Gynecologic Causes of Acute Pelvic Pain: Spectrum of CT Findings
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2002; 22(4): 785 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N Umaria and J F Olliff
Imaging features of pelvic endometriosis
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2001; 74(882): 556 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
P. J. Woodward, R. Sohaey, and T. P. Mezzetti Jr
Endometriosis: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2001; 21(1): 193 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. O. Tanaka, T. Yoshizako, M. Nishida, M. Yamaguchi, K. Sugimura, and Y. Itai
Ovarian Carcinoma in Patients with Endometriosis: MR Imaging Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1423 - 1430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y.-Y. Jeong, E. K. Outwater, and H. K. Kang
Imaging Evaluation of Ovarian Masses
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2000; 20(5): 1445 - 1470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Guerriero, S. Ajossa, G. Melis, M. D. Patel, and R. A. Filly
Performance of US in the Diagnosis of Endometrioma Drs Patel and Filly respond:
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 305- - 307.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Radiological Society of North America.