Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuhl, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Schild, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuhl, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Schild, H. H.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Radiology. 1999;211:101-110.)
© RSNA, 1999


Breast Imaging

Dynamic Breast MR Imaging: Are Signal Intensity Time Course Data Useful for Differential Diagnosis of Enhancing Lesions?1

Christiane Katharina Kuhl, MD, Peter Mielcareck, MD, Sven Klaschik, MD, Claudia Leutner, MD, Eva Wardelmann, MD, Jürgen Gieseke, PhD and Hans H. Schild, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (C.K.K., P.M., S.K., C.L., H.H.S.) and Pathology (E.W.), University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str 25, D-53105 Bonn, Germany, and Philips Medical Systems, Hamburg, Germany (J.G.). From the 1996 RSNA scientific assembly. Received March 2, 1998; revision requested May 5; final revision received August 5; accepted October 7. Address reprint requests to C.K.K.

PURPOSE: To assess the relevance of the signal intensity time course for the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixty-six breast lesions were examined with a two-dimensional dynamic MR imaging series and subtraction postprocessing. Time–signal intensity curves of the lesions were obtained and classified according to their shapes as type I, which was steady enhancement; type II, plateau of signal intensity; or type III, washout of signal intensity. Enhancement rates and curve types of benign and malignant lesions were compared.

RESULTS: There were 101 malignant and 165 benign lesions. The distribution of curve types for breast cancers was type I, 8.9%; type II, 33.6%; and type III, 57.4%. The distribution of curve types for benign lesions was type I, 83.0%; type II, 11.5%; and type III, 5.5%. The distributions proved significantly different ({chi}2 = 139.6; P < .001). The diagnostic indices for signal intensity time course were sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 83%; and diagnostic accuracy, 86%. The diagnostic indices for the enhancement rate were sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 37%; and diagnostic accuracy, 58%.

CONCLUSION: The shape of the time–signal intensity curve is an important criterion in differentiating benign and malignant enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MR imaging. A type III time course is a strong indicator of malignancy and is independent of other criteria.

Index terms: Breast neoplasms, 00.31, 00.32 • Breast neoplasms, MR, 00.121412, 00.121415, 00.12143, 00.12144 • Magnetic resonance (MR), flow studies, 00.12143, 00.12144


Related Article

Differentiating Benign from Malignant Enhancing Lesions Identified at MR Imaging of the Breast: Are Time–Signal Intensity Curves an Accurate Predictor?
Susan Greenstein Orel
Radiology 1999 211: 5-7. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A RADJENOVIC, B J DALL, J P RIDGWAY, and M A SMITH
Measurement of pharmacokinetic parameters in histologically graded invasive breast tumours using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2008; 81(962): 120 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. H. G. M. Peters, I. H. M. Borel Rinkes, N. P. A. Zuithoff, W. P. T. M. Mali, K. G. M. Moons, and P. H. M. Peeters
Meta-Analysis of MR Imaging in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 246(1): 116 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. C. Riedl, L. Ponhold, D. Flory, M. Weber, R. Kroiss, T. Wagner, M. Fuchsjager, and T. H. Helbich
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Improves Detection of Invasive Cancer, Preinvasive Cancer, and Premalignant Lesions during Surveillance of Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 13(20): 6144 - 6152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. A. Harvey, R. E. Hendrick, J. M. Coll, B. T. Nicholson, B. T. Burkholder, and M. A. Cohen
Breast MR Imaging Artifacts: How to Recognize and Fix Them
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S131 - S145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. Ojeda-Fournier, K. A. Choe, and M. C. Mahoney
Recognizing and Interpreting Artifacts and Pitfalls in MR Imaging of the Breast
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S147 - S164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J.-m. Lee, J. B. Kaplan, M. P. Murray, M. Mazur-Grbec, T. Tadic, D. Stimac, and L. Liberman
Underestimation of DCIS at MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): 468 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Kuhl
The Current Status of Breast MR Imaging * Part I. Choice of Technique, Image Interpretation, Diagnostic Accuracy, and Transfer to Clinical Practice
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 356 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. A. Jacobs, T. S. Ibrahim, and R. Ouwerkerk
AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorials AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorials for Residents: MR Imaging: Brief Overview and Emerging Applications
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 1213 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Jackson, J. P.B. O'Connor, G. J.M. Parker, and G. C. Jayson
Imaging Tumor Vascular Heterogeneity and Angiogenesis using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3449 - 3459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. C. Pinho, F. Souza, E. Endo, L. F. Chala, F. M. Carvalho, and N. de Barros
Nonnecrotizing Systemic Granulomatous Panniculitis Involving the Breast: Imaging Correlation of a Breast Cancer Mimicker
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1573 - 1576.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
radtechHome page
B. M. Kaufman, J. Lamarche, and H. Schultze-Haakh
Imaging the Augmented Breast
Radiol. Technol., January 1, 2007; 78(3): 187 - 190.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Dromain, C. Balleyguier, S. Muller, M.-C. Mathieu, F. Rochard, P. Opolon, and R. Sigal
Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): W528 - W537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. J. Macura, R. Ouwerkerk, M. A. Jacobs, and D. A. Bluemke
Patterns of Enhancement on Breast MR Images: Interpretation and Imaging Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1719 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. R. Rausch and R. E. Hendrick
How to Optimize Clinical Breast MR Imaging Practices and Techniques on Your 1.5-T System
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1469 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Narisada, T. Aoki, T. Sasaguri, H. Hashimoto, T. Konishi, M. Morita, and Y. Korogi
Correlation between numeric gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI ratios and prognostic factors and histologic type of breast carcinoma.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 297 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Tozaki, T. Igarashi, and K. Fukuda
Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 313 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Tozaki and K. Fukuda
High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 330 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Erguvan-Dogan, G. J. Whitman, A. C. Kushwaha, M. J. Phelps, and P. J. Dempsey
BI-RADS-MRI: a primer.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): W152 - W160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Atri
New Technologies and Directed Agents for Applications of Cancer Imaging
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2006; 24(20): 3299 - 3308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. D. Lehman, S. Peacock, W. B. DeMartini, and X. Chen
A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 51 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Bazzocchi, C. Zuiani, P. Panizza, C. Del Frate, F. Soldano, M. Isola, F. Sardanelli, G. M. Giuseppetti, G. Simonetti, V. Lattanzio, et al.
Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1723 - 1732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A Khiat, D Gianfelice, M Amara, and Y Boulanger
Influence of post-treatment delay on the evaluation of the response to focused ultrasound surgery of breast cancer by dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2006; 79(940): 308 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Bartella, L. Liberman, E. A. Morris, and D. D. Dershaw
Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 865 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. A. d'Arcy, D. J. Collins, A. R. Padhani, S. Walker-Samuel, J. Suckling, and M. O. Leach
Informatics in Radiology (infoRAD): Magnetic Resonance Imaging Workbench: Analysis and Visualization of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Data.
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2006; 26(2): 621 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, G. Mason, E. A. Morris, and D. D. Dershaw
Does Size Matter? Positive Predictive Value of MRI-Detected Breast Lesions as a Function of Lesion Size
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 426 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Medved, G. M. Newstead, H. Abe, M. A. Zamora, O. I. Olopade, and G. S. Karczmar
High Spectral and Spatial Resolution MRI of Breast Lesions: Preliminary Clinical Experience
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 30 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Wurdinger, A. B. Herzog, D. R. Fischer, C. Marx, G. Raabe, A. Schneider, and W. A. Kaiser
Differentiation of Phyllodes Breast Tumors from Fibroadenomas on MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1317 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Malich, D. R. Fischer, S. Wurdinger, J. Boettcher, C. Marx, M. Facius, and W. A. Kaiser
Potential MRI Interpretation Model: Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Breast Masses
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 964 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. F. Brem, J. A. Rapelyea, G. Zisman, K. Mohtashemi, J. Raub, C. B. Teal, S. Majewski, and B. L. Welch
Occult Breast Cancer: Scintimammography with High-Resolution Breast-specific Gamma Camera in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 274 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl, H. H. Schild, and N. Morakkabati
Dynamic Bilateral Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of the Breast: Trade-off between Spatial and Temporal Resolution
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 789 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. El Khoury, V. Servois, F. Thibault, A. Tardivon, L. Ollivier, M. Meunier, C. Allonier, and S. Neuenschwander
MR Quantification of the Washout Changes in Breast Tumors Under Preoperative Chemotherapy: Feasibility and Preliminary Results
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1499 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Velasco, G. Santamaria, S. Ganau, B. Farrus, G. Zanon, C. Romagosa, and P. L. Fernandez
MRI of Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1274 - 1278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Yeh, P. Slanetz, D. B. Kopans, E. Rafferty, D. Georgian-Smith, L. Moy, E. Halpern, R. Moore, I. Kuter, and A. Taghian
Prospective Comparison of Mammography, Sonography, and MRI in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Palpable Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3): 868 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. I. Wiener, K. J. Schilling, C. Adami, and N. A. Obuchowski
Assessment of Suspected Breast Cancer by MRI: A Prospective Clinical Trial Using a Combined Kinetic and Morphologic Analysis
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3): 878 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. D. Friedman, S. V. Swaminathan, and R. Smith
SENSE Imaging of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 448 - 451.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Mesurolle, I. Leconte, L. Fellah, C. Feger, T. Nakazono, and S. Kudo
Dynamic Breast MRI in Recurrent Fibromatosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 696 - 697.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. A. Bluemke, C. A. Gatsonis, M. H. Chen, G. A. DeAngelis, N. DeBruhl, S. Harms, S. H. Heywang-Kobrunner, N. Hylton, C. K. Kuhl, C. Lehman, et al.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Prior to Biopsy
JAMA, December 8, 2004; 292(22): 2735 - 2742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. A. Berg, L. Gutierrez, M. S. NessAiver, W. B. Carter, M. Bhargavan, R. S. Lewis, and O. B. Ioffe
Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 830 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Thibault, C. Nos, M. Meunier, C. El Khoury, L. Ollivier, B. Sigal-Zafrani, and K. Clough
MRI for Surgical Planning in Patients with Breast Cancer Who Undergo Preoperative Chemotherapy
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1159 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. T.-F. Shih, H.-C. Liu, C.-J. Chang, S.-Y. Wei, L.-C. Shen, and P.-C. Yang
Correlation of MR Lumbar Spine Bone Marrow Perfusion with Bone Mineral Density in Female Subjects
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 121 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
E. Warner, D. B. Plewes, K. A. Hill, P. A. Causer, J. T. Zubovits, R. A. Jong, M. R. Cutrara, G. DeBoer, M. J. Yaffe, S. J. Messner, et al.
Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers With Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasound, Mammography, and Clinical Breast Examination
JAMA, September 15, 2004; 292(11): 1317 - 1325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. H. Dennis Cheong, C. C. Tchoyoson Lim, and T. S. Koh
Dynamic Contrast-enhanced CT of Intracranial Meningioma: Comparison of Distributed and Compartmental Tracer Kinetic Models--Initial Results
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 921 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
Y.-C. Cheung, Y.-L. Wan, Y.-F. Lo, W.-M. Leung, S.-C. Chen, and S. Hsueh
Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation for Breast Cancers After Sonographically Guided Core-Needle Biopsy: A Comparison Study
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2004; 11(8): 756 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. A. Gabriel, C. Feng, E. B. Mendelson, and S. Benjamin
Breast MRI for Cancer Detection in a Patient with Diabetic Mastopathy
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2004; 182(4): 1081 - 1083.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A R Padhani
MRI for assessing antivascular cancer treatments
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(suppl_1): S60 - S80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Morakkabati, C. C. Leutner, A. Schmiedel, H. H. Schild, and C. K. Kuhl
Breast MR Imaging during or Soon after Radiation Therapy
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 893 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. W. Lee, W. K. Moon, H.-J. Weinmann, S. J. Kim, J. H. Kim, S. H. Park, T. J. Kim, C. J. Yoon, Y. H. Kim, E. Y. Cho, et al.
Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of Postoperative Scars and VX2 Carcinoma in Rabbits: Comparison of Macromolecular Contrast Agent and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 132 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. A. Jacobs, P. B. Barker, D. A. Bluemke, C. Maranto, C. Arnold, E. H. Herskovits, and Z. Bhujwalla
Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: Diagnosis with Multiparametric MR Imaging
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 225 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
H Ito, K Kamoi, K Yokoyama, K Yamada, and T Nishimura
Visualization of prostate cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with transrectal power Doppler ultrasound
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2003; 76(909): 617 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, E. A. Morris, D. D. Dershaw, A. F. Abramson, and L. K. Tan
Ductal Enhancement on MR Imaging of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 519 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. R. LaTrenta, J. H. Menell, E. A. Morris, A. F. Abramson, D. D. Dershaw, and L. Liberman
Breast Lesions Detected with MR Imaging: Utility and Histopathologic Importance of Identification with US
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 856 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
H Neubauer, M Li, R Kuehne-Heid, A Schneider, and W A Kaiser
High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2003; 76(901): 3 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Kelcz, E. Furman-Haran, D. Grobgeld, and H. Degani
Clinical Testing of High-Spatial-Resolution Parametric Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1485 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. K. W. Yeung, W.-T. Yang, and G. M. K. Tse
Breast Cancer: In Vivo Proton MR Spectroscopy in the Characterization of Histopathologic Subtypes and Preliminary Observations in Axillary Node Metastases
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 190 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. F. Tillman, S. G. Orel, M. D. Schnall, D. J. Schultz, J. E. Tan, and L. J. Solin
Effect of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging on the Clinical Management of Women With Early-Stage Breast Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., August 15, 2002; 20(16): 3413 - 3423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, E. A. Morris, M. J.-Y. Lee, J. B. Kaplan, L. R. LaTrenta, J. H. Menell, A. F. Abramson, S. M. Dashnaw, D. J. Ballon, and D. D. Dershaw
Breast Lesions Detected on MR Imaging: Features and Positive Predictive Value
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2002; 179(1): 171 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Kawashima, Y. Tamaki, T. Nonaka, K. Higuchi, M. Kimura, T. Koida, Y. Yanagita, and S. Sugihara
MR Imaging of Mucinous Carcinoma of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2002; 179(1): 179 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. C. Siegmann, M. Muller-Schimpfle, F. Schick, C. T. Remy, N. Fersis, P. Ruck, C. Gorriz, and C. D. Claussen
MR Imaging--Detected Breast Lesions: Histopathologic Correlation of Lesion Characteristics and Signal Intensity Data
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1403 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]