Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boridy, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sandler, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boridy, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sandler, C. M.
(Radiology. 1999;211:619-621.)
© RSNA, 1999

Genitourinary Imaging

Ureterolithiasis: Value of the Tail Sign in Differentiating Phleboliths from Ureteral Calculi at Nonenhanced Helical CT1

Illya C. Boridy, MD, Paul Nikolaidis, MD, Akira Kawashima, MD, Stanford M. Goldman, MD and Carl M. Sandler, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Tex. From the 1997 RSNA scientific assembly. Received January 28, 1998; revision requested April 7; revision received October 12; accepted November 9. Address reprint requests to I.C.B., Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University Medical Center, 9th Fl, Box 8131, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110.

PURPOSE: To determine the value of the tail sign in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi at nonenhanced helical computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nonenhanced helical CT scans in 82 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of pelvic ureterolithiasis were retrospectively reviewed. Each calcification along the ureter was classified as a phlebolith or a ureteral calculus on the basis of clinical and imaging findings and was analyzed for the presence of a tail sign.

RESULTS: Eighty-two patients each had a single ureteral calculus. None of these calculi were associated with a positive tail sign. Sixty-nine phleboliths were present in 35 patients. Forty-five phleboliths (65%) were associated with a positive tail sign. Of the remaining 24 phleboliths, 17 (25%) were associated with a negative tail sign and seven (10%) were indeterminate. The tail sign has a sensitivity of 65% (45 of 69; 95% CI: 53%, 75%) and a specificity of 100% (82 of 82; 95% CI: 96%, 100%) in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi.

CONCLUSION: The tail sign is an important indicator that a suspicious calcification represents a phlebolith. Absence of the tail sign indicates that the calcification remains indeterminate.

Index terms: Kidney, CT, 81.12111, 81.12115 • Ureter, calculi, 82.811 • Ureter, CT, 82.12111, 82.12115




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ImagingHome page
S J Freeman and H Sells
Investigation of loin pain
Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 38 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ImagingHome page
S J Freeman and H Sells
Investigation of loin pain
Imaging, August 1, 2005; 17(1): 19 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, and W. P. Shuman
Evaluation of the Patient with Flank Pain and Possible Ureteral Calculus
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 319 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. R. Guest, R. H. Cohan, M. Korobkin, J. F. Platt, C. C. Bundschu, I. R. Francis, A. Gebramarium, and U. M. Murray
Assessment of the Clinical Utility of the Rim and Comet-Tail Signs in Differentiating Ureteral Stones from Phleboliths
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1285 - 1291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]