|
|
||||||||
Vascular and Interventional Radiology |
1 From the Department of Radiology St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center/Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Ariz. Received December 5, 1997; revision requested February 24, 1998; revision received August 12; accepted November 5. Address reprint requests to C.L.D., Valley Radiologists Ltd, 5322 W Northern Ave, Glendale, AZ 83501.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fluoroscopically directed percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy catheter placement with gastropexy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts from 643 patients referred for fluoroscopically directed percutaneous gastrostomy or gastrojejunostomy during a 9
-year period. In 615 patients, placement was attempted with use of three T-fastener gastropexy devices followed by percutaneous gastric puncture. Placement of a 14-F gastrostomy or gastrojejunostomy catheter was then accomplished with the Seldinger technique.
RESULTS: A catheter could not be placed in 28 patients (4.4%) owing to overlying viscera or prior gastric surgery. In the remaining patients, 701 procedures, including revisions, were performed, including 643 gastrojejunostomies (92%) and 58 gastrostomies (8.3%). The success rate for catheter placement was 100%. Revision was necessary in 83 instances in 64 patients (13.5%). Forty-six (55%) of these were attributed to tube dislodgment, but only two repeat gastric punctures were necessary secondary to tract disruption. There were three major complications (0.5%) and 29 minor complications (5.3%). No complications were attributed directly to gastropexy. Thirty-day follow-up data were available for 393 patients (64%), and 14-day follow-up data were available for 550 (89%). The 30-day mortality rate was 5.8% (23 of 393 patients); none of the deaths were related to the procedure.
CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopically directed percutaneous placement of gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy catheters with routine gastropexy is a safe procedure. Catheter revision was necessary in 13% of patients and was usually secondary to tube dislodgment, with tract disruption an unusual complication.
Index terms: Gastrojejunostomy, 72.1269 Gastrostomy, 72.1269 Interventional procedures, complications, 72.1269 Stomach, interventional procedure, 72.1269
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. H. DeLegge Enteral Access in Home Care JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, January 1, 2006; 30(1_suppl): S13 - S20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H-P Dinkel, K T Beer, P Zbaren, and J Triller Establishing radiological percutaneous gastrostomy with balloon-retained tubes as an alternative to endoscopic and surgical gastrostomy in patients with tumours of the head and neck or oesophagus Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2002; 75(892): 371 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||