HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kim, C. R. Articles by Stevens, K. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kim, C. R. Articles by Stevens, K. R., Jr

Localization of the Apex of the Vagina: Implications for Radiation Therapy Planning¹

¹ From the Department of Radiation Oncology, St John Medical Center, 1614 E Kessler Blvd, Longview, WA 98632 (C.R.K., B.A.E.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Ore (K.R.S.). From the 1996 RSNA scientific assembly. Received October 7, 1997; revision requested December 16; final revision received August 28, 1998; accepted December 15. Address reprint requests to C.R.K.

PURPOSE: To evaluate (a) the displacement of the vaginal apex by a rod during radiation therapy simulation for gynecologic malignancy and (b) apical localization with implanted radiopaque markers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Metallic markers were implanted in the cervix or vaginal cuff in nine patients with cervical or endometrial carcinoma who underwent irradiation. In all but one patient, radiographs were obtained with and then without the vaginal rod. Displacement of the markers relative to bone landmarks was measured. The total displacement was the square root of the sum of the squares of displacement in each axial direction.

RESULTS: All patients showed displacement of the cervical markers by the vaginal rod (mean total displacement, 1.9 cm; range, 0.6–3.6 cm). The greatest displacement was cephalic (mean, 1.5 cm; range, 0.5–2.4 cm). Anteroposterior displacement occurred in all patients but was not as predictable as cephalic displacement. Displacement was anterior in five of the eight patients, posterior in three patients, and lateral in four patients.

CONCLUSION: Displacement of the vaginal apex and/or cervix with placement of the vaginal rod during simulation was marked in all patients. Use of implanted cervical markers to localize the vaginal apex or the cervix during simulation is more accurate than use of a vaginal rod.

Index terms: Therapeutic radiology, 854.1269 • Treatment planning, 854.1269 • Uterine neoplasms, therapeutic radiology, 854.1269, 854.32

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M Garipagaoglu, N Tuncel, M G Dalmaz, H Gulkesen, A Toy, A U Kizildag, and F G Koseoglu Changes in applicator positions and dose distribution between high dose rate brachytherapy fractions in cervix carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy. Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2006; 79(942): 504 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]