Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, H.
(Radiology. 1999;212:219-225.)
© RSNA, 1999


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Pancreatic CT Imaging: Effects of Different Injection Rates and Doses of Contrast Material1

Tonsok Kim, MD, Takamichi Murakami, MD, PhD, Satoru Takahashi, MD, Atsuya Okada, MD, Masatoshi Hori, MD, Yoshifumi Narumi, MD, PhD and Hironobu Nakamura, MD, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Osaka University Medical School, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. From the 1997 RSNA scientific assembly. Received June 17, 1998; revision requested July 30; revision received September 22; accepted December 15. Address reprint requests to T.K. (e-mail: kim@radiol.med.osakau.ac.jp).

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of the intravenous injection rate and dose of contrast material on pancreatic computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 126 patients were divided at random into four groups with different injection rates and doses. Groups 1 and 2 underwent injection of 2 mL per kilogram of body weight of 300 mg of iodine per milliliter of contrast material, and groups 3 and 4 underwent injection of 1.5 mL/kg. The injection rate was 5 mL/sec for groups 1 and 3 and 3 mL/sec for groups 2 and 4. Single-level serial CT scanning was performed at the level of the pancreatic head, and the pancreatic enhancement value was calculated.

RESULTS: The maximum pancreatic enhancement value was 99 HU ± 18 (mean ± SD) for group 1, 90 HU ± 18 for group 2, 86 HU ± 15 for group 3, and 74 HU ± 13 for group 4. There were significant differences in the maximum pancreatic enhancement value between groups 1 and 2 (P = .045), between groups 3 and 4 (P = .001), between groups 1 and 3 (P = .016), and between groups 2 and 4 (P = .001).

CONCLUSION: Both a higher dose and a faster injection rate increased the maximum pancreatic enhancement value.

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), contrast enhancement, 770.12112, 770.12119 • Pancreas, CT, 770.12112, 770.12119 • Pancreas, neoplasms, 770.32




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, Y. Tamura, M. Hatemura, and Y. Yamashita
Pancreas: Patient Body Weight tailored Contrast Material Injection Protocol versus Fixed Dose Protocol at Dynamic CT
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 475 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Kondo, M. Kanematsu, S. Goshima, T. Miyoshi, Y. Shiratori, M. Onozuka, N. Moriyama, and K. T. Bae
MDCT of the Pancreas: Optimizing Scanning Delay with a Bolus-Tracking Technique for Pancreatic, Peripancreatic Vascular, and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 751 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Schueller, W. Schima, C. Schueller-Weidekamm, M. Weber, A. Stift, M. Gnant, and R. Prokesch
Multidetector CT of Pancreas: Effects of Contrast Material Flow Rate and Individualized Scan Delay on Enhancement of Pancreas and Tumor Contrast
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 441 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Goshima, M. Kanematsu, H. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, T. Miyoshi, H. Kato, Y. Tsuge, Y. Shiratori, H. Hoshi, M. Onozuka, et al.
Pancreas: Optimal Scan Delay for Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 167 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Itoh, M. Ikeda, H. Satake, T. Ota, and T. Ishigaki
The effect of patient age on contrast enhancement during CT of the pancreatobiliary region.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 505 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. T. Johnson and E. K. Fishman
IV Contrast Selection for MDCT: Current Thoughts and Practice
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 406 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Imbriaco
Reply
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 267 - 267.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. M. Erturk
Value of the Single-Phase Technique in MDCT Assessment of Pancreatic Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 266 - 267.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Imbriaco, A. J. Megibow, A. Ragozzino, R. Liuzzi, P. Mainenti, S. Bortone, L. Camera, and M. Salvatore
Value of the Single-Phase Technique in MDCT Assessment of Pancreatic Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1111 - 1117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S Fenchel, T R Fleiter, A J Aschoff, R van Gessel, H-J Brambs, and E M Merkle
Effect of iodine concentration of contrast media on contrast enhancement in multislice CT of the pancreas
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2004; 77(922): 821 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Matsuki, H. Kani, F. Tatsugami, S. Yoshikawa, I. Narabayashi, S.-W. Lee, H. Shinohara, E. Nomura, and N. Tanigawa
Preoperative Assessment of Vascular Anatomy Around the Stomach by 3D Imaging Using MDCT Before Laparoscopy-Assisted Gastrectomy
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 145 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. L. Bronstein, E. M. Loyer, H. Kaur, H. Choi, C. David, R. A. DuBrow, L. D. Broemeling, K. R. Cleary, and C. Charnsangavej
Detection of Small Pancreatic Tumors with Multiphasic Helical CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2004; 182(3): 619 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Awai, K. Hiraishi, and S. Hori
Effect of Contrast Material Injection Duration and Rate on Aortic Peak Time and Peak Enhancement at Dynamic CT Involving Injection Protocol with Dose Tailored to Patient Weight
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 142 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. G. Fletcher, M. J. Wiersema, M. A. Farrell, J. L. Fidler, L. J. Burgart, T. Koyama, C. D. Johnson, D. H. Stephens, E. M. Ward, and W. S. Harmsen
Pancreatic Malignancy: Value of Arterial, Pancreatic, and Hepatic Phase Imaging with Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 81 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, C. Charnsangavej, and D. B. Evans
Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance of Pancreatic Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1311 - 1323.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. D. Johnson
Pancreatic Carcinoma: Developing a Protocol for Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 3 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. J. McNulty, I. R. Francis, J. F. Platt, R. H. Cohan, M. Korobkin, and A. Gebremariam
Multi-Detector Row Helical CT of the Pancreas: Effect of Contrast-enhanced Multiphasic Imaging on Enhancement of the Pancreas, Peripancreatic Vasculature, and Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 97 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Yamashita, Y. Komohara, M. Takahashi, M. Uchida, N. Hayabuchi, T. Shimizu, and I. Narabayashi
Abdominal Helical CT: Evaluation of Optimal Doses of Intravenous Contrast Material-A Prospective Randomized Study
Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 718 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text]