|
|
||||||||
Thoracic Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (D.D.M., W.T.M.Jr., J.M.A., W.B.G., W.T.M.Sr.) and Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division (R.M.K., G.T.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 1st Floor Silverstein, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104. From the 1997 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 3, 1998; revision requested April 9; final revision received October 12; accepted December 16. Address reprint requests to W.T.M.Jr. (e-mail: miller2@rad.upenn.edu).
PURPOSE: To determine whether preoperative chest radiographic findings alone can reliably predict which patients will achieve the best functional outcome of lung volume reduction surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The preoperative chest radiographs obtained in 57 patients who had undergone lung volume reduction surgery were retrospectively scored by five blinded readers for severity and distribution of emphysema, evidence of lung compression, disease heterogeneity, and other features. Comparisons were made with the 36-month postoperative functional outcome for each patient.
RESULTS: High disease heterogeneity (score >2) and unequivocal lung compression (score 1) both were 100% predictive of a favorable outcome (FEV1 increase,
30%). Low heterogeneity (score <1) was 94% predictive of an unfavorable outcome (FEV1 increase <30%), as was a lack of lung compression, which was 92% predictive of an unfavorable outcome. These two features also correlated with an improved 6-minute walk test result, although this correlation was weaker.
CONCLUSION: Chest radiography alone may be sufficient for initial screening. High disease heterogeneity and lung compression on chest radiographs are highly predictive of a favorable functional outcome.
Index terms: Emphysema, pulmonary, 60.751 Lung, diseases, 60.751 Lung, surgery Lung, ventilation, 60.1295
Related Article
Radiology 1999 212: 1-3.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. M. Trotta, A. V. Stolin, M. B. Williams, S. B. Gay, A. S. Brody, and T. A. Altes Characterization of the Relation Between CT Technical Parameters and Accuracy of Quantification of Lung Attenuation on Quantitative Chest CT Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1683 - 1690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H O Coxson, K P Whittall, Y Nakano, R M Rogers, F C Sciurba, R J Keenan, and J C Hogg Selection of patients for lung volume reduction surgery using a power law analysis of the computed tomographic scan Thorax, June 1, 2003; 58(6): 510 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Gelb and R. J. McKenna Jr Lung Volume Reduction Surgery Update Chest, April 1, 2003; 123(4): 975 - 977. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Cederlund, U. Tylen, L. Jorfeldt, and P. Aspelin Classification of Emphysema in Candidates for Lung Volume Reduction Surgery* : A New Objective and Surgically Oriented Model for Describing CT Severity and Heterogeneity Chest, August 1, 2002; 122(2): 590 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Kotloff, J. Hansen-Flaschen, D. A. Lipson, G. Tino, S. M. Arcasoy, A. Alavi, and L. R. Kaiser Apical Perfusion Fraction as a Predictor of Short-term Functional Outcome Following Bilateral Lung Volume Reduction Surgery Chest, November 1, 2001; 120(5): 1609 - 1615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group Patients at High Risk of Death after Lung-Volume-Reduction Surgery N. Engl. J. Med., October 11, 2001; 345(15): 1075 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Flaherty, E. A. Kazerooni, J. L. Curtis, M. Iannettoni, L. Lange, M. A. Schork, and F. J. Martinez Short-term and Long-term Outcomes After Bilateral Lung Volume Reduction Surgery : Prediction by Quantitative CT Chest, May 1, 2001; 119(5): 1337 - 1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Maki, W. B. Gefter, and A. Alavi Recent Advances in Pulmonary Imaging Chest, November 1, 1999; 116(5): 1388 - 1402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. M. Austin Pulmonary Emphysema: Imaging Assessment of Lung Volume Reduction Surgery Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 1 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||