|
|
||||||||
Gastrointestinal Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University Hospital, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto City 860-0811, Japan. Received December 24, 1997; revision requested March 24, 1998; final revision received November 24; accepted March 2, 1999. Address reprint requests to Y.Y. (e-mail: yama@kaiju.medic.kumamoto-u.ac.jp).
PURPOSE: To compare contrast materialenhanced thin-section helical CT with breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR imaging for sensitivity in the detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and for accuracy in local tumor staging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients (37 men, 20 women aged 4228 years) suspected of having pancreatic adenocarcinoma were examined. The final diagnosis was confirmed at surgery to be pancreatic cancer in 31 patients; the other 26 patients were deemed not to have pancreatic cancer. All patients underwent both CT and MR imaging (turbo spin-echo and fast low-angle shot) studies. Image quality and pancreatic enhancement were subjectively evaluated. All CT scans and MR images were assessed by two independent observers by using a five-point scale for the detection of tumor and of invasion into the peripancreatic tissue, portal vein, and/or peripancreatic artery. Receiver operating characteristic curves for CT and MR imaging were analyzed.
RESULTS: At visual analysis, pancreatic enhancement at CT and at MR imaging was comparable, but depiction of vessels was superior at helical CT. Detectability of tumor was comparable. Helical CT was significantly superior to MR imaging in diagnostic imaging of invasion into the peripancreatic tissue, portal vein, and/or peripancreatic artery (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: Thin-section dynamic CT is more sensitive than MR imaging for detection of peripancreatic and vascular invasion in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies, 77.12111, 77.12112, 77.12115, 77.12118 Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies, 77.121411, 77.121415, 77.121416, 77.12143 Pancreas, CT, 77.12111, 77.12112, 77.12115, 77.12118 Pancreas, MR, 77.121411, 77.121415, 77.121416, 77.12143 Pancreas, neoplasms, 77.291, 77.321, 77.33 Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Furukawa, K. Uesaka, and N. Boku Treatment Decision Making in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Multidisciplinary Team Discussion With Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography Arch Surg, March 1, 2008; 143(3): 275 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Manoharan and M B Sheridan Neoplasms of the pancreas Imaging, September 1, 2004; 16(4): 323 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gangi, J. G. Fletcher, M. A. Nathan, J. A. Christensen, W. S. Harmsen, B. S. Crownhart, and S. T. Chari Time Interval Between Abnormalities Seen on CT and the Clinical Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: Retrospective Review of CT Scans Obtained Before Diagnosis Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2004; 182(4): 897 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, C. Charnsangavej, and D. B. Evans Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance of Pancreatic Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1311 - 1323. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ozawa, K. Numata, K. Tanaka, N. Ueno, T. Kiba, K. Hara, M. Morimoto, T. Sakaguchi, H. Sekihara, T. Kubota, et al. Contrast-Enhanced Sonography of Small Pancreatic Mass Lesions J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2002; 21(9): 983 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Schima, R. Fugger, E. Schober, C. Oettl, P. Wamser, F. Grabenwoger, J. M. Ryan, and G. Novacek Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Cancer: Comparison of Mangafodipir Trisodium--Enhanced MR Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Helical Hydro-CT Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2002; 179(3): 717 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yoshimitsu, H. Honda, K. Shinozaki, H. Aibe, T. Kuroiwa, H. Irie, K. Chijiiwa, Y. Asayama, and K. Masuda Helical CT of the Local Spread of Carcinoma of the Gallbladder: Evaluation According to the TNM System in Patients Who Underwent Surgical Resection Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 423 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Valls, E. Andia, A. Sanchez, J. Fabregat, O. Pozuelo, J. C. Quintero, T. Serrano, F. Garcia-Borobia, and R. Jorba Dual-Phase Helical CT of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Assessment of Resectability Before Surgery Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 821 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. McMahon, E. F. Halpern, C. Fernandez-del Castillo, J. W. Clark, and G. S. Gazelle Pancreatic Cancer: Cost-Effectiveness of Imaging Technologies for Assessing Resectability Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 93 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Takahashi, T. Murakami, M. Takamura, T. Kim, M. Hori, Y. Narumi, H. Nakamura, and M. Kudo Multi-Detector Row Helical CT Angiography of Hepatic Vessels: Depiction with Dual-arterial Phase Acquisition during Single Breath Hold Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 81 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |