|
|
||||||||
Musculoskeletal Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology (C.F.B., A.G.B., K.B., B.L.D., C.L.N., R.J.H.) and the School of Medicine (D.K.H.), Stanford University Medical Center, Rm S-056, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305; and the GE Corporate Research and Development Center, Schenectady, NY (R.D.D., C.L.D.). Received July 7, 1998; revision requested September 11; final revision received, October 27; accepted March 29, 1999. C.F.B. supported in part by a 1997 RSNA Scholar Award. A.G.B. supported in part by a 1997 Toshiba America/RSNA (1) Seed Grant. Address reprint requests to C.F.B.
PURPOSE: To test the hypotheses that open dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can (a) be used to evaluate and define normal shoulder motion in active joint motion and muscle contraction and (b) be used in conjunction with physical examination.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: With an open-configuration, 0.5-T MR imaging system and active image-plane tracking, 10 shoulders were studied in five asymptomatic subjects to establish normal patterns of glenohumeral motion during abduction and adduction and internal and external rotation. Preliminary studies of physical examination during MR imaging, in which a physician examiner applied mechanical force to the humeral head, were also performed.
RESULTS: During abduction and adduction and internal and external rotation maneuvers with active subject muscle contraction, the humeral head remained precisely centered on the glenoid fossa in all asymptomatic subjects, which is in agreement with findings of previous radiographic studies. Application of force to the humeral head by an examiner was associated with as much as 6 mm of anterior translation and 13 mm of posterior translation.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic MR imaging of the glenohumeral joint is possible over a wide range of physiologic motion in vertically open systems. Use of an MR tracking coil enabled accurate tracking of the anatomy of interest. These preliminary measurements of normal glenohumeral motion patterns begin to establish normal ranges of motion and constitute a necessary first step in characterizing pathologic motion in patients with common clinical problems such as instability and impingement.
Index terms: Magnetic resonance (MR), motion studies, 414.121412 Shoulder, MR, 414.1214
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. E. Gold, G. P. Pappas, S. S. Blemker, S. T. Whalen, G. Campbell, T. A. McAdams, and C. F. Beaulieu Abduction and External Rotation in Shoulder Impingement: An Open MR Study on Healthy Volunteers Initial Experience Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 815 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Bureau, M. Beauchamp, E. Cardinal, and P. Brassard Dynamic sonography evaluation of shoulder impingement syndrome. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 216 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Schiffern, R. Rozencwaig, J. Antoniou, M. L. Richardson, and F. A. Matsen III Anteroposterior Centering of the Humeral Head on the Glenoid In Vivo Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2002; 30(3): 382 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |