|
|
||||||||
Neuroradiology |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860, Japan. From the 1997 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 13, 1998; revision requested April 15; final revision received December 16; accepted March 16, 1999. Address reprint requests to T.O.
PURPOSE: To compare qualitatively and quantitatively the contrast of brain lesions detected with fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) and intermediate-weighted sequences at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 47 patients suspected of having a brain lesion underwent MR imaging with FLAIR, intermediate-weighted, and T2-weighted sequences. Qualitative assessment was performed of lesion conspicuity, detection, overall image artifact, and additional clinical information. Contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated between lesions and the normal brain or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
RESULTS: FLAIR images were equal to intermediate-weighted images for overall lesion conspicuity and detection but were associated more often with image artifacts. Lesion-to-background contrast was significantly higher on FLAIR than on intermediate-weighted images. FLAIR images failed to demonstrate multiple sclerosis (MS) plaques located in the basal ganglia and brain stem.
CONCLUSION: Although FLAIR images provided additional information in some cases, they did not have distinct advantages over intermediate-weighted images. When cases of MS are evaluated, intermediate-weighted images are preferable to FLAIR images. Except in cases of MS, either FLAIR or intermediate-weighted sequences should be added to T2-weighted sequences at MR imaging.
Index terms: Basal ganglia, MR, 14.121411, 14.121413, 15.121416 Brain, diseases, 14.30, 14.76, 14.871, 15.30, 15.76, 15.871 Brain, ischemia, 14.76, 15.76 Brain, neoplasms, 14.30, 15.30 Brain stem, MR, 15.121411, 15.121413, 15.121416 Magnetic resonance (MR), pulse sequences, 18.121411, 18.121413, 18.121416 Sclerosis, multiple, 18.871
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A Saleh, F Wenserski, M Cohnen, G Furst, E Godehardt, and U Modder Exclusion of brain lesions: is MR contrast medium required after a negative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence? Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2004; 77(915): 183 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Bastos Leite, E. C.W. van Straaten, P. Scheltens, G. Lycklama, and F. Barkhof Thalamic Lesions in Vascular Dementia: Low Sensitivity of Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) Imaging Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 415 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. Kallmes, F. K. Hui, and J. P. Mugler III Suppression of Cerebrospinal Fluid and Blood Flow Artifacts in FLAIR MR Imaging with a Single-Slab Three-dimensional Pulse Sequence: Initial Experience Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 251 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. Okujava, F. G. Woermann, T. Hirai, and Y. Korogi Evaluation of the Human Limbic Lobe Drs Hirai and Korogi respond: Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 555 - 556. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Toyoda, M. Ida, and K. Fukuda Fluid-attenuated Inversion Recovery Intraarterial Signal: An Early Sign of Hyperacute Cerebral Ischemia AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2001; 22(6): 1021 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Herlihy, J. V. Hajnal, W. L. Curati, N. Virji, A. Oatridge, B. K. Puri, and G. M. Bydder Reduction of CSF and Blood Flow Artifacts on FLAIR Images of the Brain with k-Space Reordered by Inversion Time at each Slice Position (KRISP) AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2001; 22(5): 896 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Herskovits, R. Itoh, and E. R. Melhem Accuracy for Detection of Simulated Lesions: Comparison of Fluid-Attenuated Inversion-Recovery, Proton Density-Weighted, and T2-Weighted Synthetic Brain MR Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1313 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||