|
|
||||||||
Experimental Studies |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (M.E.T., F.N.T.) and Pharmacology (M.E.M.), Albany Medical College, 43 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY 12208. From the 1998 RSNA scientific assembly. Received October 1, 1998; revision requested November 10; revision received December 17; accepted February 17, 1999. M.E.T. supported in part by a 1996 RSNA Seed Grant. M.E.M. supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the American Heart Association. Address reprint requests to M.E.T. (e-mail: tublin@rad.amc.edu).
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of acute changes in renal vascular resistance (RVR) and pulse pressure on the resistive index (RI) measured by using Doppler ultrasonography (US).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rabbit kidneys were perfused by using a pulsatile perfusion system in which RVR, systolic and diastolic pulse pressures, and pulse kinetics were controlled and monitored while simultaneously measuring the RI.
RESULTS: When RVR was increased fivefold with phenylephrine hydrochloride, the RI increased only slightly (from 0.45 at baseline up to 0.50). There was a virtually linear relationship between the RI and the pulse pressure index ([systolic pressure - diastolic pressure]/systolic pressure) in the range of 0.300.80. The RI was not affected by the pulse rate or fraction of time that systolic pressure was applied during the pulse cycle.
CONCLUSION: Contrary to conventional teaching, which is based on theoretic considerations, the RI is not readily affected by acute changes in RVR. This indicates a need to reconsider the conventional explanations used to explain increases in RI that are frequently found in patients with renal disease or ureteral obstruction.
Index terms: Kidney, US, 81.1298, 81.12981, 81.12983, 81.12984 Renal arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 961.723 Renal arteries, US, 961.12983, 961.12984 Ureter, stenosis or obstruction, 82.84
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Parolini, A. Noce, E. Staffolani, G. F. Giarrizzo, S. Costanzi, and G. Splendiani Renal Resistive Index and Long-term Outcome in Chronic Nephropathies Radiology, June 15, 2009; (2009) 2523080351. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Heine, B. Reichart, C. Ulrich, H. Kohler, and M. Girndt Do ultrasound renal resistance indices reflect systemic rather than renal vascular damage in chronic kidney disease? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 163 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gurel, D. Akata, K. Gurel, M. N. Ozmen, and O. Akhan Correlation Between the Renal Resistive Index (RI) and Nonenhanced Computed Tomography in Acute Renal Colic: How Reliable Is the RI in Distinguishing Obstruction? J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2006; 25(9): 1113 - 1120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sigirci, T. Hallac, A. Akyncy, I. Temel, H. Gulcan, M. Aslan, M. Kocer, B. Kahraman, A. Alkan, and R. Kutlu Renal interlobar artery parameters with duplex Doppler sonography and correlations with age, plasma Renin, and aldosterone levels in healthy children. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 828 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Vallejos, G. Alperovich, F. Moreso, C. Canas, M. E. de Lama, M. Goma, X. Fulladosa, M. Carrera, M. Hueso, J. M. Grinyo, et al. Resistive index and chronic allograft nephropathy evaluated in protocol biopsies as predictors of graft outcome Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 2511 - 2516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Soulez, E. Therasse, S. D. Qanadli, D. Froment, M. Leveille, V. Nicolet, S. Turpin, M.-F. Giroux, M. C. Guertin, and V. L. Oliva Prediction of Clinical Response After Renal Angioplasty: Respective Value of Renal Doppler Sonography and Scintigraphy Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2003; 181(4): 1029 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Tublin, R. O. Bude, and J. F. Platt The Resistive Index in Renal Doppler Sonography: Where Do We Stand? Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 885 - 892. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||