|
|
||||||||
Thoracic Imaging |
1 From the Institute of Clinical Radiology (S.D., H.L., R.W., Z.P., S.H., T.K., M.E., N.R., P.E.P.) and the Gerhard Do- magk Institute of Pathology (T.M.Y.), University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Str 33, D-48129 Münster, Germany. Received September 30, 1998; revision requested November 17; revision received January 14, 1999; accepted April 15. Address reprint requests to S.D. (e-mail: diestef@uni-muenster.de).
PURPOSE: To compare the number of pulmonary nodules detected at helical low- and standard-dose computed tomography (CT) and to investigate the diagnostic value of low-dose CT with a radiation exposure equivalent to that used at chest radiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two radiologists recorded pulmonary nodules at standard-dose (250 or 100 mA, pitch of 1; 200 mA, pitch of 2) or low-dose CT (50 or 25 mA, pitch of 1 or 2) in five postmortem specimens and 75 patients. Nodules were assessed by size (5 mm or smaller, 610 mm, or larger than 10 mm) and by diagnostic confidence ("definite nodule," "definite lesion, not classic nodule," or "questionable lesion, possibly representing a vessel") with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Artifacts depicted at low-dose CT were recorded.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the number of nodules detected at standard- or low-dose CT except in nodules 5 mm or smaller that were assessed as definite nodules at standard- or low-dose CT (25 mA, pitch of 2) (472 vs 397, P < .05). Artifacts that possibly interfered with nodule detection were observed exclusively at CT with 25 mA and a pitch of 2.
CONCLUSION: Pulmonary nodules were detected reliably at CT with 50 mA and pitch of 2 or with 25 mA and a pitch of 1. However, further reduction of the dose to that used at chest radiography was associated with a significant decrease in the number of nodules 5 mm or smaller that were detected, possibly due to artifacts.
Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies, 60.12115 Computed tomography (CT), experimental studies, 60.12115 Computed tomography (CT), radiation exposure, 60.12115, 60.47 Lung, nodule, 60.281 Lung neoplasms, CT, 60.12115, 60.281 Lung neoplasms, diagnosis, 60.281
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Kubo, P.-J. P. Lin, W. Stiller, M. Takahashi, H.-U. Kauczor, Y. Ohno, and H. Hatabu Radiation Dose Reduction in Chest CT: A Review Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 335 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Y. Donmez, E. Yekeler, V. Saeidi, A. Tunaci, M. Tunaci, and G. Acunas Dynamic Contrast Enhancement Patterns of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules on 3D Gradient-Recalled Echo MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1380 - 1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Imai, M Ikeda, S Wada, Y Enchi, and T Niimi Analysis of streak artefacts on CT images using statistics of extremes Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 911 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Orel, M. Rosen, C. Mies, and M. D. Schnall MR Imaging-guided 9-gauge Vacuum-assisted Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: Initial Experience Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 54 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Parker, F. K. Hui, M. A. Camacho, J. K. Chung, D. W. Broga, and N. N. Sethi Female Breast Radiation Exposure During CT Pulmonary Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1228 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Irie and H. Inoue Individual Modulation of the Tube Current-Seconds to Achieve Similar Levels of Image Noise in Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1514 - 1518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Doi Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2005; 78(suppl_1): S3 - s19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kosucu, A. Ahmetoglu, I. Koramaz, F. Orhan, O. Ozdemir, H. Dinc, A. Okten, and H. R. Gumele Low-Dose MDCT and Virtual Bronchoscopy in Pediatric Patients with Foreign Body Aspiration Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1771 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhu, J. Yu, and Z. Huang Low-Dose Chest CT: Optimizing Radiation Protection for Patients Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 809 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Schaefer, J. Vollmar, F. Schick, R. Vonthein, M. D. Seemann, H. Aebert, R. Dierkesmann, G. Friedel, and C. D. Claussen Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging--Perfusion Differences in Malignant and Benign Lesions Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 544 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Kalra, M. M. Maher, T. L. Toth, L. M. Hamberg, M. A. Blake, J.-A. Shepard, and S. Saini Strategies for CT Radiation Dose Optimization Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 619 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Fischbach, T. Freund, R. Rottgen, U. Engert, R. Felix, and J. Ricke Dual-Energy Chest Radiography with a Flat-Panel Digital Detector: Revealing Calcified Chest Abnormalities Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1519 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. T. Winer-Muram, S. G. Jennings, C. A. Meyer, Y. Liang, A. M. Aisen, R. D. Tarver, and R. C. McGarry Effect of Varying CT Section Width on Volumetric Measurement of Lung Tumors and Application of Compensatory Equations Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 184 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Kalra, C. Wittram, M. M. Maher, A. Sharma, G. B. Avinash, K. Karau, T. L. Toth, E. Halpern, S. Saini, and J.-A. Shepard Can Noise Reduction Filters Improve Low-Radiation-Dose Chest CT Images? Pilot Study Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 257 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Chiu, M.-S. Chern, M.-H. Wu, W.-H. Hsu, Y.-C. Wu, M.-H. Huang, and S.-C. Chang Usefulness of low-dose spiral CT of the chest in regular follow-up of postoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients: Preliminary report J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1300 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Biederer, A. Schoene, S. Freitag, M. Reuter, and M. Heller Simulated Pulmonary Nodules Implanted in a Dedicated Porcine Chest Phantom: Sensitivity of MR Imaging for Detection Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 475 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Armato III, F. Li, M. L. Giger, H. MacMahon, S. Sone, and K. Doi Lung Cancer: Performance of Automated Lung Nodule Detection Applied to Cancers Missed in a CT Screening Program Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 685 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Kalra, S. Prasad, S. Saini, M. A. Blake, J. Varghese, E. F. Halpern, J. T. Rhea, and J. H. Thrall Clinical Comparison of Standard-Dose and 50% Reduced--Dose Abdominal CT: Effect on Image Quality Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1101 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Itoh, M. Ikeda, Y. Mori, K. Suzuki, A. Sawaki, S. Iwano, H. Satake, S. Arahata, T. Isomura, M. Ozaki, et al. Lung: Feasibility of a Method for Changing Tube Current during Low-Dose Helical CT Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 905 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Prasad, C. Wittram, J.-A. Shepard, T. McLoud, and J. Rhea Standard-Dose and 50%--Reduced-Dose Chest CT: Comparing the Effect on Image Quality Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 461 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schaefer-Prokop and M. Prokop New imaging techniques in the treatment guidelines for lung cancer Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 71S - 83s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Ravenel, E. M. Scalzetti, W. Huda, and W. Garrisi Radiation Exposure and Image Quality in Chest CT Examinations Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 279 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Haaga Radiation Dose Management: Weighing Risk Versus Benefit Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 289 - 291. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Orel and M. D. Schnall MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 13 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Paterson, D. P. Frush, and L. F. Donnelly Helical CT of the Body: Are Settings Adjusted for Pediatric Patients? Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 297 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z-G Yang, S Sone, F Li, S Takashima, Y Maruyama, T Honda, and M Hasegawa Visibility of small peripheral lung cancers on chest radiographs: influence of densitometric parameters, CT values and tumour type Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2001; 74(877): 32 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. Yankelevitz, A. P. Reeves, W. J. Kostis, B. Zhao, and C. I. Henschke Small Pulmonary Nodules: Volumetrically Determined Growth Rates Based on CT Evaluation Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 251 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Frush, L. F. Donnelly, and H. G. Chotas Contemporary Pediatric Thoracic Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 841 - 851. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liberman Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Breast Biopsy: State of the Art at the Millennium Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1191 - 1199. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Diederich, D. Wormanns, M. Semik, M. Thomas, H. Lenzen, N. Roos, and W. Heindel Screening for Early Lung Cancer with Low-Dose Spiral CT: Prevalence in 817 Asymptomatic Smokers Radiology, March 1, 2002; 222(3): 773 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||