Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diederich, S.
Right arrow Articles by Peters, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diederich, S.
Right arrow Articles by Peters, P. E.
(Radiology. 1999;213:289-298.)
© RSNA, 1999


Thoracic Imaging

Pulmonary Nodules: Experimental and Clinical Studies at Low-Dose CT1

Stefan Diederich, MD, Horst Lenzen, BSc, Ralf Windmann, MD, Zoltan Puskas, MD, Talat M. Yelbuz, MD, Stefan Henneken, MD, Thomas Klaiber, MD, Mitra Eameri, Nikolaus Roos, MD and Peter E. Peters, MD 2

1 From the Institute of Clinical Radiology (S.D., H.L., R.W., Z.P., S.H., T.K., M.E., N.R., P.E.P.) and the Gerhard Do- magk Institute of Pathology (T.M.Y.), University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Str 33, D-48129 Münster, Germany. Received September 30, 1998; revision requested November 17; revision received January 14, 1999; accepted April 15. Address reprint requests to S.D. (e-mail: diestef@uni-muenster.de).

PURPOSE: To compare the number of pulmonary nodules detected at helical low- and standard-dose computed tomography (CT) and to investigate the diagnostic value of low-dose CT with a radiation exposure equivalent to that used at chest radiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two radiologists recorded pulmonary nodules at standard-dose (250 or 100 mA, pitch of 1; 200 mA, pitch of 2) or low-dose CT (50 or 25 mA, pitch of 1 or 2) in five postmortem specimens and 75 patients. Nodules were assessed by size (5 mm or smaller, 6–10 mm, or larger than 10 mm) and by diagnostic confidence ("definite nodule," "definite lesion, not classic nodule," or "questionable lesion, possibly representing a vessel") with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Artifacts depicted at low-dose CT were recorded.

RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the number of nodules detected at standard- or low-dose CT except in nodules 5 mm or smaller that were assessed as definite nodules at standard- or low-dose CT (25 mA, pitch of 2) (472 vs 397, P < .05). Artifacts that possibly interfered with nodule detection were observed exclusively at CT with 25 mA and a pitch of 2.

CONCLUSION: Pulmonary nodules were detected reliably at CT with 50 mA and pitch of 2 or with 25 mA and a pitch of 1. However, further reduction of the dose to that used at chest radiography was associated with a significant decrease in the number of nodules 5 mm or smaller that were detected, possibly due to artifacts.

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies, 60.12115 • Computed tomography (CT), experimental studies, 60.12115 • Computed tomography (CT), radiation exposure, 60.12115, 60.47 • Lung, nodule, 60.281 • Lung neoplasms, CT, 60.12115, 60.281 • Lung neoplasms, diagnosis, 60.281




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Kubo, P.-J. P. Lin, W. Stiller, M. Takahashi, H.-U. Kauczor, Y. Ohno, and H. Hatabu
Radiation Dose Reduction in Chest CT: A Review
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 335 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Y. Donmez, E. Yekeler, V. Saeidi, A. Tunaci, M. Tunaci, and G. Acunas
Dynamic Contrast Enhancement Patterns of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules on 3D Gradient-Recalled Echo MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1380 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Imai, M Ikeda, S Wada, Y Enchi, and T Niimi
Analysis of streak artefacts on CT images using statistics of extremes
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 911 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel, M. Rosen, C. Mies, and M. D. Schnall
MR Imaging-guided 9-gauge Vacuum-assisted Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: Initial Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 54 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. S. Parker, F. K. Hui, M. A. Camacho, J. K. Chung, D. W. Broga, and N. N. Sethi
Female Breast Radiation Exposure During CT Pulmonary Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1228 - 1233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Irie and H. Inoue
Individual Modulation of the Tube Current-Seconds to Achieve Similar Levels of Image Noise in Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1514 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Doi
Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2005; 78(suppl_1): S3 - s19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Kosucu, A. Ahmetoglu, I. Koramaz, F. Orhan, O. Ozdemir, H. Dinc, A. Okten, and H. R. Gumele
Low-Dose MDCT and Virtual Bronchoscopy in Pediatric Patients with Foreign Body Aspiration
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1771 - 1777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
X. Zhu, J. Yu, and Z. Huang
Low-Dose Chest CT: Optimizing Radiation Protection for Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 809 - 816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. F. Schaefer, J. Vollmar, F. Schick, R. Vonthein, M. D. Seemann, H. Aebert, R. Dierkesmann, G. Friedel, and C. D. Claussen
Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging--Perfusion Differences in Malignant and Benign Lesions
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 544 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. K. Kalra, M. M. Maher, T. L. Toth, L. M. Hamberg, M. A. Blake, J.-A. Shepard, and S. Saini
Strategies for CT Radiation Dose Optimization
Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 619 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Fischbach, T. Freund, R. Rottgen, U. Engert, R. Felix, and J. Ricke
Dual-Energy Chest Radiography with a Flat-Panel Digital Detector: Revealing Calcified Chest Abnormalities
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1519 - 1524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. T. Winer-Muram, S. G. Jennings, C. A. Meyer, Y. Liang, A. M. Aisen, R. D. Tarver, and R. C. McGarry
Effect of Varying CT Section Width on Volumetric Measurement of Lung Tumors and Application of Compensatory Equations
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 184 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. K. Kalra, C. Wittram, M. M. Maher, A. Sharma, G. B. Avinash, K. Karau, T. L. Toth, E. Halpern, S. Saini, and J.-A. Shepard
Can Noise Reduction Filters Improve Low-Radiation-Dose Chest CT Images? Pilot Study
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 257 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C.-H. Chiu, M.-S. Chern, M.-H. Wu, W.-H. Hsu, Y.-C. Wu, M.-H. Huang, and S.-C. Chang
Usefulness of low-dose spiral CT of the chest in regular follow-up of postoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients: Preliminary report
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1300 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Biederer, A. Schoene, S. Freitag, M. Reuter, and M. Heller
Simulated Pulmonary Nodules Implanted in a Dedicated Porcine Chest Phantom: Sensitivity of MR Imaging for Detection
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 475 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Armato III, F. Li, M. L. Giger, H. MacMahon, S. Sone, and K. Doi
Lung Cancer: Performance of Automated Lung Nodule Detection Applied to Cancers Missed in a CT Screening Program
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 685 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. K. Kalra, S. Prasad, S. Saini, M. A. Blake, J. Varghese, E. F. Halpern, J. T. Rhea, and J. H. Thrall
Clinical Comparison of Standard-Dose and 50% Reduced--Dose Abdominal CT: Effect on Image Quality
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1101 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Itoh, M. Ikeda, Y. Mori, K. Suzuki, A. Sawaki, S. Iwano, H. Satake, S. Arahata, T. Isomura, M. Ozaki, et al.
Lung: Feasibility of a Method for Changing Tube Current during Low-Dose Helical CT
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 905 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. R. Prasad, C. Wittram, J.-A. Shepard, T. McLoud, and J. Rhea
Standard-Dose and 50%--Reduced-Dose Chest CT: Comparing the Effect on Image Quality
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 461 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C. Schaefer-Prokop and M. Prokop
New imaging techniques in the treatment guidelines for lung cancer
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 71S - 83s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. G. Ravenel, E. M. Scalzetti, W. Huda, and W. Garrisi
Radiation Exposure and Image Quality in Chest CT Examinations
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 279 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. R. Haaga
Radiation Dose Management: Weighing Risk Versus Benefit
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 289 - 291.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel and M. D. Schnall
MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 13 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Paterson, D. P. Frush, and L. F. Donnelly
Helical CT of the Body: Are Settings Adjusted for Pediatric Patients?
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 297 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
Z-G Yang, S Sone, F Li, S Takashima, Y Maruyama, T Honda, and M Hasegawa
Visibility of small peripheral lung cancers on chest radiographs: influence of densitometric parameters, CT values and tumour type
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2001; 74(877): 32 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. F. Yankelevitz, A. P. Reeves, W. J. Kostis, B. Zhao, and C. I. Henschke
Small Pulmonary Nodules: Volumetrically Determined Growth Rates Based on CT Evaluation
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 251 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. P. Frush, L. F. Donnelly, and H. G. Chotas
Contemporary Pediatric Thoracic Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 841 - 851.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman
Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Breast Biopsy: State of the Art at the Millennium
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1191 - 1199.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Diederich, D. Wormanns, M. Semik, M. Thomas, H. Lenzen, N. Roos, and W. Heindel
Screening for Early Lung Cancer with Low-Dose Spiral CT: Prevalence in 817 Asymptomatic Smokers
Radiology, March 1, 2002; 222(3): 773 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]