|
|
||||||||
Genitourinary Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, Tisch Hospital, 560 First Ave, Suite HW 202, New York, NY 10016. From the 1998 RSNA scientific assembly. Received January 29, 1999; revision requested March 24; revision received April 14; accepted June 21. Address reprint requests to M.M. (e-mail: michael.macari@med.nyu.edu).
PURPOSE: To determine whether delayed computed tomography (CT) can help confirm vascularity in a neoplasm and differentiate it from a high-density cyst when a well-demarcated homogeneous high-attenuating (>30-HU) renal mass is incidentally discovered during contrast materialenhanced CT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 25 patients, 26 well-demarcated, homogeneous high-attenuating renal masses (mean diameter, 2.5 cm; range, 14 cm) detected at initial postcontrast CT were further evaluated with delayed CT (mean, 38 minutes; range, 15240 minutes) performed with identical parameters. On both the initial postcontrast and delayed CT scans, region-of-interest measurements were obtained in renal masses and in the gallbladder or low-density renal cysts as controls. Correlation with surgical or additional imaging findings was used to determine proof of diagnosis.
RESULTS: Nine of the masses demonstrated no change in attenuation between initial postcontrast and delayed CT, indicating that they represented avascular lesions consistent with high-density cysts. These cases were confirmed with prior or follow-up imaging studies that demonstrated stability. Seventeen masses (nine surgically proved neoplasms and eight neoplasms that demonstrated interval growth at follow-up or previous CT) demonstrated decreased attenuation at delayed CT compared with initial postcontrast CT, which indicates vascularity.
CONCLUSION: Delayed CT of incidentally discovered well-demarcated homogeneous high-attenuating (>30-HU) renal masses detected at postcontrast CT enables differentiation of high-density cysts from renal neoplasms by demonstrating deenhancement as a proof of vascularity and, hence, neoplasm.
Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), tissue characterization, 81.12114, 81.12115 Kidney, CT, 81.12114, 81.12115 Kidney neoplasms, CT, 81.1211 Kidney neoplasms, diagnosis, 81.31, 81.32
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Mahadevia, A. Rozenblit, D. Milikow, and A. Marinovich Renal-Adrenal Fusion: Instance of an Adrenal Adenoma Mimicking a Solid Renal Mass at CT--Case Report Radiology, June 1, 2009; 251(3): 808 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Vikram, C. S. Ng, P. Tamboli, N. M. Tannir, E. Jonasch, S. F. Matin, C. G. Wood, and C. M. Sandler Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation and Spectrum of Disease RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 741 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Spendiff and A Rockall Imaging assessment of renal masses Imaging, September 1, 2008; 20(3): 205 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dyer, D. J. DiSantis, and B. L. McClennan Simplified Imaging Approach for Evaluation of the Solid Renal Mass in Adults Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 331 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L R Williams, M J Oldale, and A J Bradley Imaging renal masses and staging renal tumours Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 73 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Silverman, K. J. Mortele, K. Tuncali, M. Jinzaki, and E. S. Cibas Hyperattenuating Renal Masses: Etiologies, Pathogenesis, and Imaging Evaluation RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 1131 - 1143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Vasanawala and T. Desser Value of delayed imaging in MDCT of the abdomen and pelvis. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 154 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Choi, S. Shankar, D. Stachurski, and B. F. Banner Nonneoplastic Hyperdense Enhancing Renal Mass: CT Findings and Pathologic Correlation Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1597 - 1599. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Katz-Brull, N. M. Rofsky, M. M. Morrin, I. Pedrosa, D. J. George, M. D. Michaelson, R. P. Marquis, M. Maril, C. Noguera, and R. E. Lenkinski Decreases in free cholesterol and fatty acid unsaturation in renal cell carcinoma demonstrated by breath-hold magnetic resonance spectroscopy Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): F637 - F641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Hartman, P. L. Choyke, and M. S. Hartman From the RSNA Refresher Courses: A Practical Approach to the Cystic Renal Mass RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S101 - S115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Suh, F. V. Coakley, A. Qayyum, B. M. Yeh, R. S. Breiman, and Y. Lu Distinction of Renal Cell Carcinomas from High-Attenuation Renal Cysts at Portal Venous Phase Contrast-enhanced CT Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 330 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. Mayo-Smith, D. E. Dupuy, P. M. Parikh, J. A. Pezzullo, and J. J. Cronan Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Solid Renal Masses: Techniques and Outcomes of 38 Treatment Sessions in 32 Consecutive Patients Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2003; 180(6): 1503 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Herts, D. M. Coll, A. C. Novick, N. Obuchowski, G. Linnell, S. L. Wirth, and M. E. Baker Enhancement Characteristics of Papillary Renal Neoplasms Revealed on Triphasic Helical CT of the Kidneys Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 367 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sheth, J. C. Scatarige, K. M. Horton, F. M. Corl, and E. K. Fishman Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Role of Multidetector CT and Three-dimensional CT RadioGraphics, October 1, 2001; 21(90001): S237 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Zagoria Imaging of Small Renal Masses: A Medical Success Story Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 945 - 955. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Curry, S. T. Cochran, and N. K. Bissada Cystic Renal Masses: Accurate Bosniak Classification Requires Adequate Renal CT Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 339 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||