Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, U.
Right arrow Articles by Grabbe, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, U.
Right arrow Articles by Grabbe, E.
(Radiology. 1999;213:881-888.)
© RSNA, 1999


Breast Imaging

Breast Carcinoma: Effect of Preoperative Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging on the Therapeutic Approach1

Uwe Fischer, MD, Lars Kopka, MD and Eckhardt Grabbe, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany. Received June 17, 1998; revision requested August 13; final revision received March 3, 1999; accepted July 1. Address reprint requests to U.F.

PURPOSE: To determine if magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can help determine the therapeutic approach in women with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast was performed in 463 patients with probably benign lesions (n = 63), suspicious lesions (n = 230), or lesions highly suggestive of malignancy (n = 170) per established clinical, mammographic, and/or ultrasonographic (US) criteria. T1-weighted fast low-angle shot MR imaging was performed before and after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. MR imaging findings were correlated with other imaging results and histopathologic findings. Special attention was paid to multifocality and multicentricity.

RESULTS: Histopathologic analysis revealed 143 benign and 405 malignant lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 58%, 76%, and 62% for clinical examination; 86%, 32%, and 72% for conventional mammography; 75%, 80%, and 76% for US; and 93%, 65%, and 85% for contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Multifocality in 30 of 42 patients, multicentricity in 24 of 50 patients, and additional contralateral carcinomas in 15 of 19 patients were depicted with MR imaging alone. Due to the MR imaging findings, therapy was changed correctly in 66 patients (14.3%); unnecessary open biopsy was performed in 16 patients (3.5%).

CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast is highly sensitive for invasive breast cancer. MR imaging may reveal unsuspected multifocal, multicentric, or contralateral breast carcinoma and result in therapy changes.

Index terms: Breast neoplasms, diagnosis, 00.30 • Breast neoplasms, MR, 00.12143, 00.121416 • Breast neoplasms, staging, 00.30 • Breast neoplasms, US, 00.1298 • Treatment planning




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
T. A. Heusner, S. Kuemmel, L. Umutlu, A. Koeninger, L. S. Freudenberg, E. A.M. Hauth, K. R. Kimmig, M. Forsting, A. Bockisch, and G. Antoch
Breast Cancer Staging in a Single Session: Whole-Body PET/CT Mammography
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1215 - 1222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. Houssami, S. Ciatto, P. Macaskill, S. J. Lord, R. M. Warren, J. M. Dixon, and L. Irwig
Accuracy and Surgical Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Staging: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Detection of Multifocal and Multicentric Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2008; 26(19): 3248 - 3258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Godinez, E. C. Gombos, S. A. Chikarmane, G. K. Griffin, and R. L. Birdwell
Breast MRI in the Evaluation of Eligibility for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 272 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
N. Taira, S. Ohsumi, D. Takabatake, F. Hara, S. Takashima, K. Aogi, S. Takashima, T. Inoue, S. Sugata, and R. Nishimura
Contrast-enhanced CT Evaluation of Clinically and Mammographically Occult Multiple Breast Tumors in Women with Unilateral Early Breast Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 38(6): 419 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Orel
Who Should Have Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation?
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 703 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. A. Buchholz, C. D. Lehman, J. R. Harris, B. A. Pockaj, N. Khouri, N. F. Hylton, M. J. Miller, T. Whelan, L. J. Pierce, L. J. Esserman, et al.
Statement of the Science Concerning Locoregional Treatments After Preoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Institute Conference
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 791 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. J. Kim, E.-K. Kim, J. Y. Kwak, B.-W. Park, S.-I. Kim, and K. K. Oh
Bilateral Synchronous Breast Cancer in an Asian Population: Mammographic and Sonographic Characteristics, Detection Methods, and Staging
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 208 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. Morrogh, E. A. Morris, L. Liberman, P. I. Borgen, and T. A. King
The Predictive Value of Ductography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Nipple Discharge
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 14(12): 3369 - 3377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. H. G. M. Peters, I. H. M. Borel Rinkes, N. P. A. Zuithoff, W. P. T. M. Mali, K. G. M. Moons, and P. H. M. Peeters
Meta-Analysis of MR Imaging in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 246(1): 116 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. K. Kang, G. S. Jeon, H. Yim, and Y. S. Jung
Diagnosis of the Intraductal Component of Invasive Breast Cancer: Assessment With Mammography and Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2007; 26(11): 1587 - 1600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
N. Biglia, L. Mariani, L. Sgro, P. Mininanni, G. Moggio, and P. Sismondi
Increased incidence of lobular breast cancer in women treated with hormone replacement therapy: implications for diagnosis, surgical and medical treatment
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 549 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl
Current Status of Breast MR Imaging * Part 2. Clinical Applications
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 672 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. L. B. Bevilacqua, M. W. Kattan, J. V. Fey, H. S. Cody III, P. I. Borgen, and K. J. Van Zee
Doctor, What Are My Chances of Having a Positive Sentinel Node? A Validated Nomogram for Risk Estimation
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2007; 25(24): 3670 - 3679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Kuhl
The Current Status of Breast MR Imaging * Part I. Choice of Technique, Image Interpretation, Diagnostic Accuracy, and Transfer to Clinical Practice
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 356 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. C. Williams, W. B. DeMartini, S. C. Partridge, S. Peacock, and C. D. Lehman
Breast MR Imaging: Computer-aided Evaluation Program for Discriminating Benign from Malignant Lesions
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 94 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. D. Lehman, C. Gatsonis, C. K. Kuhl, R. E. Hendrick, E. D. Pisano, L. Hanna, S. Peacock, S. F. Smazal, D. D. Maki, T. B. Julian, et al.
MRI Evaluation of the Contralateral Breast in Women with Recently Diagnosed Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., March 29, 2007; 356(13): 1295 - 1303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Sardanelli, F. Podo, G. D'Agnolo, A. Verdecchia, M. Santaquilani, R. Musumeci, G. Trecate, S. Manoukian, S. Morassut, C. de Giacomi, et al.
Multicenter Comparative Multimodality Surveillance of Women at Genetic-Familial High Risk for Breast Cancer (HIBCRIT Study): Interim Results
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 698 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. C. Genson, C. E. Blane, M. A. Helvie, S. A. Waits, and T. L. Chenevert
Effects on Breast MRI of Artifacts Caused by Metallic Tissue Marker Clips
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 372 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. J. Macura, R. Ouwerkerk, M. A. Jacobs, and D. A. Bluemke
Patterns of Enhancement on Breast MR Images: Interpretation and Imaging Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1719 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. R. Rausch and R. E. Hendrick
How to Optimize Clinical Breast MR Imaging Practices and Techniques on Your 1.5-T System
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1469 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Tozaki, T. Igarashi, and K. Fukuda
Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 313 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Tozaki and K. Fukuda
High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 330 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. R. Fischer, A. Malich, S. Wurdinger, J. Boettcher, M. Dietzel, and W. A. Kaiser
The adjacent vessel on dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): W147 - W151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. A. Causer, C. A. Piron, R. A. Jong, B. N. Curpen, C. A. Luginbuhl, J. E. Glazier, E. Warner, K. Hill, J. Muldoon, G. Taylor, et al.
MR Imaging-guided Breast Localization System with Medial or Lateral Access
Radiology, August 1, 2006; 240(2): 369 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Bazzocchi, C. Zuiani, P. Panizza, C. Del Frate, F. Soldano, M. Isola, F. Sardanelli, G. M. Giuseppetti, G. Simonetti, V. Lattanzio, et al.
Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1723 - 1732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. K. Kuhl, S. Schrading, C. C. Leutner, N. Morakkabati-Spitz, E. Wardelmann, R. Fimmers, W. Kuhn, and H. H. Schild
Mammography, Breast Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Women at High Familial Risk for Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2005; 23(33): 8469 - 8476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
S. K. Shah, S. K. Shah, and K. V. Greatrex
Current Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Imaging: A Primer for the Primary Care Physician
J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2005; 18(6): 478 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Wurdinger, A. B. Herzog, D. R. Fischer, C. Marx, G. Raabe, A. Schneider, and W. A. Kaiser
Differentiation of Phyllodes Breast Tumors from Fibroadenomas on MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1317 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Malich, D. R. Fischer, S. Wurdinger, J. Boettcher, C. Marx, M. Facius, and W. A. Kaiser
Potential MRI Interpretation Model: Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Breast Masses
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 964 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Pediconi, C. Catalano, R. Occhiato, F. Venditti, F. Fraioli, A. Napoli, M. A. Kirchin, and R. Passariello
Breast Lesion Detection and Characterization at Contrast-enhanced MR Mammography: Gadobenate Dimeglumine versus Gadopentetate Dimeglumine
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 45 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl, H. H. Schild, and N. Morakkabati
Dynamic Bilateral Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of the Breast: Trade-off between Spatial and Temporal Resolution
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 789 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Sardanelli, A. Iozzelli, A. Fausto, A. Carriero, and M. A. Kirchin
Gadobenate Dimeglumine-enhanced MR Imaging Breast Vascular Maps: Association between Invasive Cancer and Ipsilateral Increased Vascularity
Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 791 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. A. Newman and H. M. Kuerer
Advances in Breast Conservation Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1685 - 1697.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. E. Deurloo, S. H. Muller, J. L. Peterse, A. P. E. Besnard, and K. G. A. Gilhuijs
Clinically and Mammographically Occult Breast Lesions on MR Images: Potential Effect of Computerized Assessment on Clinical Reading
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 693 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. A. Bluemke, C. A. Gatsonis, M. H. Chen, G. A. DeAngelis, N. DeBruhl, S. Harms, S. H. Heywang-Kobrunner, N. Hylton, C. K. Kuhl, C. Lehman, et al.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Prior to Biopsy
JAMA, December 8, 2004; 292(22): 2735 - 2742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. A. Berg, L. Gutierrez, M. S. NessAiver, W. B. Carter, M. Bhargavan, R. S. Lewis, and O. B. Ioffe
Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 830 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. Komatsu, C. J. Lee, Y. Hosokawa, D. Ichikawa, T. Hamashima, K. Shirono, H. Okabe, H. Kurioka, and T. Oka
Comparison of Intraductal Spread on Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI with Clinicopathologic Features in Breast Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2004; 34(9): 515 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
Y.-C. Cheung, Y.-L. Wan, Y.-F. Lo, W.-M. Leung, S.-C. Chen, and S. Hsueh
Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation for Breast Cancers After Sonographically Guided Core-Needle Biopsy: A Comparison Study
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2004; 11(8): 756 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. M. Lee, S. G. Orel, B. J. Czerniecki, L. J. Solin, and M. D. Schnall
MRI Before Reexcision Surgery in Patients with Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2004; 182(2): 473 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Morakkabati, C. C. Leutner, A. Schmiedel, H. H. Schild, and C. K. Kuhl
Breast MR Imaging during or Soon after Radiation Therapy
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 893 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Teifke, H. A. Lehr, T. W. Vomweg, A. Hlawatsch, and M. Thelen
Outcome Analysis and Rational Management of Enhancing Lesions Incidentally Detected on Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 655 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. V. Knopp, M. W. Bourne, F. Sardanelli, M. N. Wasser, L. Bonomo, C. Boetes, M. Muller-Schimpfle, M. A. Hall-Craggs, B. Hamm, A. Orlacchio, et al.
Gadobenate Dimeglumine-Enhanced MRI of the Breast: Analysis of Dose Response and Comparison with Gadopentetate Dimeglumine
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 663 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, E. A. Morris, D. D. Dershaw, A. F. Abramson, and L. K. Tan
MR Imaging of the Ipsilateral Breast in Women with Percutaneously Proven Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 901 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Lee, S. G. Orel, I. J. Woo, E. Cruz-Jove, M. E. Putt, L. J. Solin, B. J. Czerniecki, and M. D. Schnall
MR Imaging Screening of the Contralateral Breast in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results
Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 773 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, E. A. Morris, C. M. Kim, J. B. Kaplan, A. F. Abramson, J. H. Menell, K. J. Van Zee, and D. D. Dershaw
MR Imaging Findings in the Contralateral Breast of Women with Recently Diagnosed Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 333 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Hlawatsch, A. Teifke, M. Schmidt, and M. Thelen
Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer: Sonography Versus MR Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1493 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. C. A. Michel, T. M. Keller, J. M. Frohlich, D. Fink, R. Caduff, B. Seifert, B. Marincek, and R. A. Kubik-Huch
Preoperative Breast Cancer Staging: MR Imaging of the Axilla with Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Enhancement
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 527 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A Rieber, H Schirrmeister, A Gabelmann, K Nuessle, S Reske, R Kreienberg, H J Brambs, and T Kuehn
Pre-operative staging of invasive breast cancer with MR mammography and/or PET: boon or bunk?
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2002; 75(898): 789 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Teifke, A. Hlawatsch, T. Beier, T. Werner Vomweg, S. Schadmand, M. Schmidt, H.-A. Lehr, and M. Thelen
Undetected Malignancies of the Breast: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging at 1.0 T
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 881 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. K. Moon, D.-Y. Noh, and J.-G. Im
Multifocal, Multicentric, and Contralateral Breast Cancers: Bilateral Whole-Breast US in the Preoperative Evaluation of Patients
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 569 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
I. Bedrosian, J. Schlencker, F. R. Spitz, S. G. Orel, D. L. Fraker, L. S. Callans, M. Schnall, C. Reynolds, and B. J. Czerniecki
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Biopsy of Mammographically and Clinically Occult Breast Lesions
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2002; 9(5): 457 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. C. Siegmann, M. Muller-Schimpfle, F. Schick, C. T. Remy, N. Fersis, P. Ruck, C. Gorriz, and C. D. Claussen
MR Imaging--Detected Breast Lesions: Histopathologic Correlation of Lesion Characteristics and Signal Intensity Data
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1403 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel and M. D. Schnall
MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 13 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl, N. Morakkabati, C. C. Leutner, A. Schmiedel, E. Wardelmann, and H. H. Schild
MR Imaging-guided Large-Core (14-Gauge) Needle Biopsy of Small Lesions Visible at Breast MR Imaging Alone
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 31 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Radiological Society of North America.