Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spring, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pruyn, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spring, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pruyn, S. C.
(Radiology. 2000;214:53-57.)
© RSNA, 2000


Genitourinary Imaging

Potential Therapeutic Effects of Contrast Materials in Hysterosalpingography: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial1

David B. Spring, MD, Howard E. Barkan, DrPH and Stephen C. Pruyn, MD For the Kaiser Permanente Infertility Work Group

1 From the Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (D.B.S.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (S.C.P.), Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 280 W MacArthur Blvd, Oakland, CA 94611-5693, and Health Services Research, Berkeley, Calif (H.E.B.). Received December 23, 1998; revision requested February 19, 1999; revision received April 20; accepted July 29. Supported in part by Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program–Northern California Innovation Project grant no. 930198. Address reprint requests to D.B.S. (e-mail: David.Spring@kp.org).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the contrast material used in hysterosalpingography (HSG) on subsequent reproductive success, independent of other therapeutic interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, multisite, randomized trial, 666 women who had been infertile for more than 1 year and were scheduled to undergo HSG as part of their evaluation were assigned to one of three groups: those receiving water-soluble contrast material (WSCM) (n = 260), those receiving oil-soluble contrast material (OSCM) (n = 273), and those receiving both OSCM and WSCM (n = 133). Possible causes of infertility and therapeutic interventions were abstracted from the medical records. Data on conception within 1 year and the outcome of conception were ascertained from multiple sources.

RESULTS: Of 666 women, 204 (30.6%) had at least one pregnancy, and 136 (20.4%) had live births. The rates of live births were 20.4% (54 of 260) after HSG with WSCM, 19.4% (53 of 273) after HSG with OSCM, and 21.8% (29 of 133) after HSG with both WSCM and OSCM. Differences in reproductive outcome among contrast material groups were not statistically significant ({chi}28 = 6.08, P = .64). Whatever the cause of infertility, the use of different contrast materials led to no significant differences in the rates of live births.

CONCLUSION: There is no evidence to suggest that the choice of contrast material affects the rate of term pregnancy.

Index terms: Abortion, 854.8252 • Contrast media, comparative studies • Contrast media, therapeutic effects • Pregnancy, 854.131 • Pregnancy, ectopic, 854.823 • Uterus, radiography, 854.1282




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Lindborg, J. Thorburn, C. Bergh, and A. Strandell
Influence of HyCoSy on spontaneous pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1075 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. P. Johnson, W. E. Hadden, L. W. Chamley, D. B. Spring, H. E. Barkan, A. J. Yun, and P. Y. Lee
Fertility Enhancement by Hysterosalpingography with Oil-Soluble Contrast Media: Reality Not Myth
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1654 - 1657.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Yun, D. B. Spring, and H. E. Barkan
Enhanced Fertility After Diagnostic Hysterosalpingography: The Debate Continues
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 347 - 348.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. B. Spring and H. E. Barkan
Enhanced Fertility After Diagnostic Hysterosalpingography May Be a Myth
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1728 - 1728.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. J. W. Sandstede, T. Johnson, K. Harre, M. Beer, S. Hofmann, T. Pabst, W. Kenn, W. Voelker, S. Neubauer, and D. Hahn
Cardiac Systolic Rotation and Contraction Before and After Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis: A Myocardial Tagging Study Using MR Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 953 - 958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. L. Valentini, L. Muzii, R. Marana, G. F. Catalano, V. Summaria, F. Felici, A. Rossetti, and C. Destito
Improvement of Hysterosalpingographic Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Peritubal Adhesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1173 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]