|
|
||||||||
Genitourinary Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (D.B.S.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (S.C.P.), Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 280 W MacArthur Blvd, Oakland, CA 94611-5693, and Health Services Research, Berkeley, Calif (H.E.B.). Received December 23, 1998; revision requested February 19, 1999; revision received April 20; accepted July 29. Supported in part by Kaiser Permanente Medical Care ProgramNorthern California Innovation Project grant no. 930198. Address reprint requests to D.B.S. (e-mail: David.Spring@kp.org).
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the contrast material used in hysterosalpingography (HSG) on subsequent reproductive success, independent of other therapeutic interventions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, multisite, randomized trial, 666 women who had been infertile for more than 1 year and were scheduled to undergo HSG as part of their evaluation were assigned to one of three groups: those receiving water-soluble contrast material (WSCM) (n = 260), those receiving oil-soluble contrast material (OSCM) (n = 273), and those receiving both OSCM and WSCM (n = 133). Possible causes of infertility and therapeutic interventions were abstracted from the medical records. Data on conception within 1 year and the outcome of conception were ascertained from multiple sources.
RESULTS: Of 666 women, 204 (30.6%) had at least one pregnancy, and 136 (20.4%) had live births. The rates of live births were 20.4% (54 of 260) after HSG with WSCM, 19.4% (53 of 273) after HSG with OSCM, and 21.8% (29 of 133) after HSG with both WSCM and OSCM. Differences in reproductive outcome among contrast material groups were not statistically significant (
28 = 6.08, P = .64). Whatever the cause of infertility, the use of different contrast materials led to no significant differences in the rates of live births.
CONCLUSION: There is no evidence to suggest that the choice of contrast material affects the rate of term pregnancy.
Index terms: Abortion, 854.8252 Contrast media, comparative studies Contrast media, therapeutic effects Pregnancy, 854.131 Pregnancy, ectopic, 854.823 Uterus, radiography, 854.1282
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Lindborg, J. Thorburn, C. Bergh, and A. Strandell Influence of HyCoSy on spontaneous pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1075 - 1079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. P. Johnson, W. E. Hadden, L. W. Chamley, D. B. Spring, H. E. Barkan, A. J. Yun, and P. Y. Lee Fertility Enhancement by Hysterosalpingography with Oil-Soluble Contrast Media: Reality Not Myth Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1654 - 1657. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Yun, D. B. Spring, and H. E. Barkan Enhanced Fertility After Diagnostic Hysterosalpingography: The Debate Continues Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 347 - 348. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Spring and H. E. Barkan Enhanced Fertility After Diagnostic Hysterosalpingography May Be a Myth Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1728 - 1728. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. W. Sandstede, T. Johnson, K. Harre, M. Beer, S. Hofmann, T. Pabst, W. Kenn, W. Voelker, S. Neubauer, and D. Hahn Cardiac Systolic Rotation and Contraction Before and After Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis: A Myocardial Tagging Study Using MR Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 953 - 958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Valentini, L. Muzii, R. Marana, G. F. Catalano, V. Summaria, F. Felici, A. Rossetti, and C. Destito Improvement of Hysterosalpingographic Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Peritubal Adhesions Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1173 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||