|
|
||||||||
Head and Neck Imaging |
1 From the Endocrine (M.L.D.F., C.B., M.S., M.L.B.), Radiology (S.C., A.T.), Surgery (D.B., P.C., F.T.), and Nuclear Medicine Units (G.B., L.V.) of the Department of Clinical Physiopathology, and the Pathologic Anatomy Unit (A.A.), University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy. Received January 14, 1998; revision requested April 2; final revision received April 28, 1999; accepted June 1. Supported in part the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC). Address reprint requests to M.L.B. (e-mail: m.brandi@dfc.unifi.it).
PURPOSE: To determine the appropriate choice of imaging techniques for localization of nodular lesions of parathyroid glands.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, computed tomographic (CT), magnetic resonance (MR), ultrasonographic (US), and technetium 99m methoxyisobutyl-isonitrile (MIBI) scintigraphic images in 49 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism were retrospectively evaluated. A single-blind, prospective study that included 16 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism was then conducted. MR, US, scintigraphic, and color Doppler US images of the neck were obtained and analyzed.
RESULTS: In the retrospective study, CT, MR imaging, and US had low sensitivity (13%, 17%, and 27%, respectively) and specificity (39%, 65%, and 65%, respectively). Scintigraphy had 57% sensitivity and 85% specificity. In the prospective study, the use of latest-generation MR and US equipment and the participation of experienced operators led to improved sensitivity and specificity for these techniques. The combination of US and scintigraphy resulted in improved sensitivity (96%), specificity (83%), and positive and negative predictive values (88% and 94%, respectively), relative to the results obtained with either method alone. Doppler US was of little help in the setting of small glands.
CONCLUSIONS:
The combination of 99mTc MIBI scintigraphy and US performed by well-trained operators with up-to-date instruments appeared to be the best diagnostic tool for the preoperative diagnosis of parathyroid disease.
Index terms: Parathyroid, CT, 274.1211 Parathyroid, hyperparathyroidism, 274.531 Parathyroid, MR, 274.121411, 274.12143 Parathyroid, neoplasms, 274.363 Parathyroid, radionuclide studies, 274.12175 Parathyroid, US, 274.12981, 274.12983
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. E. Tublin, D. A. Pryma, J. H. Yim, J. B. Ogilvie, J. M. Mountz, B. Bencherif, and S. E. Carty Localization of Parathyroid Adenomas by Sonography and Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Before Minimally Invasive Parathyroidectomy: Are Both Studies Really Needed? J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2009; 28(2): 183 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hara, T. Takayama, M. Onoguchi, N. Obane, T. Miyati, T. Yoshioka, K. Sakaguchi, and M. Honda Subtraction SPECT for Parathyroid Scintigraphy Based on Maximization of Mutual Information J. Nucl. Med. Technol., June 1, 2007; 35(2): 84 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Johnson, M. E. Tublin, and J. B. Ogilvie Parathyroid Imaging: Technique and Role in the Preoperative Evaluation of Primary Hyperparathyroidism Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1706 - 1715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Scarsbrook, R. V. Thakker, J. A. H. Wass, F. V. Gleeson, and R. R. Phillips Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia: Spectrum of Radiologic Appearances and Discussion of a Multitechnique Imaging Approach. RadioGraphics, March 1, 2006; 26(2): 433 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Mariani, S. A. Gulec, D. Rubello, G. Boni, M. Puccini, M. R. Pelizzo, G. Manca, D. Casara, G. Sotti, P. Erba, et al. Preoperative Localization and Radioguided Parathyroid Surgery J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 1443 - 1458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Reeder, T. S. Desser, R. J. Weigel, and R. B. Jeffrey Sonography in Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Review With Emphasis on Scanning Technique J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2002; 21(5): 539 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S A Sohaib and G Cook The parathyroid glands Imaging, April 1, 2002; 14(2): 115 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Brandi, R. F. Gagel, A. Angeli, J. P. Bilezikian, P. Beck-Peccoz, C. Bordi, B. Conte-Devolx, A. Falchetti, R. G. Gheri, A. Libroia, et al. CONSENSUS: Guidelines for Diagnosis and Therapy of MEN Type 1 and Type 2 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2001; 86(12): 5658 - 5671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Gotway, G. P. Reddy, W. R. Webb, E. T. Morita, O. H. Clark, and C. B. Higgins Comparison between MR Imaging and Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 783 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Loney, E. A. Dick, I. S. Francis, J. R. Buscombe, M. L. De Feo, S. Colagrande, C. Biagini, A. Tonarelli, G. Bisi, L. Vaggelli, et al. Localization of Parathyroid Nodules Dr De Feo and colleagues respond: Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 916 - 917. [Full Text] |
||||