Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qayyum, A.
Right arrow Articles by Husband, J. E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qayyum, A.
Right arrow Articles by Husband, J. E. S.
(Radiology. 2000;214:837-842.)
© RSNA, 2000


Thoracic Imaging

Symptomatic Brachial Plexopathy following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Utility of MR Imaging with Surface-Coil Techniques1

Aliya Qayyum, MRCP, FRCR, A. David MacVicar, MA, MRCP, FRCR, Anwar R. Padhani, MRCP, FRCR, Patrick Revell, BSc and Janet E. S. Husband, FRCP, FRCR

1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Royal Marsden National Health Service Trust, Downs Rd, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, England. From the 1997 RSNA scientific assembly. Received September 17, 1998; revision requested November 23; final revision received June 28, 1999; accepted August 2. Address reprint requests to A.D.M.

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with symptomatic brachial plexopathy following treatment for breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with symptoms of brachial plexopathy (principally pain, weakness, and paresthesia) who had received treatment for breast cancer, which included surgery, radiation therapy, and cytotoxic chemotherapy, underwent MR imaging at 1.5 T. MR imaging was performed by using a body coil, which was supplemented with surface-coil imaging of the cervical spine and shoulder-coil imaging of the brachial plexus. At review, two observers attempted to discriminate between tumor recurrence and nonmalignant causes of symptoms. The diagnosis was verified with histologic analysis or a follow-up of at least 12 months.

RESULTS: Of 27 patients demonstrated to have tumor recurrence, 26 were correctly identified by using MR imaging; the recurrence was directly related to the brachial plexus in 17. During the follow-up, 21 patients remained free of recurrence, 20 of whom were determined to have a nonmalignant cause of symptoms. Two of the 50 patients were excluded from the analysis. The MR criteria used for detection of tumor yielded a sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 96%, and negative predictive value of 95%.

CONCLUSION: MR imaging is reliable and accurate in the diagnosis of symptomatic brachial plexopathy following breast cancer therapy.

Index terms: Brachial plexus, 31.339 • Brachial plexus, MR, 31.121411, 31.121413, 31.30 • Breast neoplasms, therapy, 00.30, 07.30, 09.30 • Magnetic resonance (MR), coil arrays, 00.121411







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.