|
|
||||||||
Gastrointestinal Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (N.O.W., S.H.) and Surgery (A.A.S.), Center for Medical Imaging and Physiology, University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden; and Nycomed-Amersham, Stockholm and Oslo, Sweden (E.J., D.T.K., S.M.). From the 1995 RSNA scientific assembly. Received January 27, 1998; revision requested April 7; final revision received June 14, 1999; accepted July 20. Address reprint requests to N.O.W.
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the imaging findings and staging of rectal carcinoma by using conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, MR imaging with an enema of superparamagnetic ferristene-based contrast material, and MR imaging with an enema of ferristene solution plus intravenous injection of gadodiamide.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (17 women, 12 men; age range, 3991 years) referred with a diagnosis of rectal carcinoma were examined. Analysis of the rectal wall and staging of the tumor were performed. In all patients, the MR imaging findings were correlated with the histopathologic findings.
RESULTS: The contrast material enema caused distention of the rectum and an intraluminal signal void, whereas the gadodiamide injection caused enhancement of the mucosa on T1-weighted images. This enhancement enabled evaluation of the normal rectal wall and differentiation of the mucosa, tunica muscularis, and perirectal space, which was not possible on the nonenhanced images. Double-contrast (ferristene solution plus gadodiamide) MR imaging was superior to imaging with only ferristene-based contrast material and had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 70%, and accuracy of 90% in distinguishing tumor stages worse than Dukes A.
CONCLUSION: Double contrast materialenhanced MR imaging enables accurate rectal carcinoma staging, which is not possible at nonenhanced imaging.
Index terms: Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast media, 757.121411, 757.12143 Neoplasms, staging, 757.32 Rectum, MR, 757.121411, 757.12143 Rectum, neoplasms, 757.32
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. H. Kim, J. M. Lee, M. W. Lee, G. H. Kim, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi Sonography Transmission Gel as Endorectal Contrast Agent for Tumor Visualization in Rectal Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 186 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. M. Zhang, H. L. Zhang, D. Yu, Y. Dai, D. Bi, M. R. Prince, and C. Li 3-T MRI of Rectal Carcinoma: Preoperative Diagnosis, Staging, and Planning of Sphincter-Sparing Surgery Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1271 - 1278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nakai, K. Togashi, K. Kosaka, A. Kido, M. Kataoka, T. Koyama, and S. Fujii Do Anticholinergic Agents Suppress Uterine Peristalsis and Sporadic Myometrial Contractions at Cine MR Imaging? Radiology, December 19, 2007; (2007) 2461062091. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Dhamanaskar, W. Thurston, and S. R. Wilson Transvaginal sonography as an adjunct to endorectal sonography in the staging of rectal cancer in women. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 90 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. A. Vliegen, G. L. Beets, M. F. von Meyenfeldt, A. G. H. Kessels, E. E. M. T. Lemaire, J. M. A. van Engelshoven, and R. G. H. Beets-Tan Rectal Cancer: MR Imaging in Local Staging--Is Gadolinium-based Contrast Material Helpful? Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 179 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-J. Kim, J. S. Lim, Y. T. Oh, J. H. Kim, J.-J. Chung, S. H. Joo, N. K. Kim, K. Y. Lee, W. H. Kim, and K. W. Kim Preoperative MRI of Rectal Cancer With and Without Rectal Water Filling: An Intraindividual Comparison Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2004; 182(6): 1469 - 1476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Fuchsjager, A. G. Maier, W. Schima, E. Zebedin, F. Herbst, M. Mittlbock, F. Wrba, and G. L. Lechner Comparison of Transrectal Sonography and Double-Contrast MR Imaging When Staging Rectal Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 421 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T H Saunders, H K Mendes Ribeiro, and F V Gleeson New techniques for imaging colorectal cancer: the use of MRI, PET and radioimmunoscintigraphy for primary staging and follow-up Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2002; 64(1): 81 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. K. Goh, J. P. N. Goh, and G. K. L. Wansaicheong Methylcellulose as a Rectal Contrast Agent for MR Imaging of Rectal Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1145 - 1146. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||