|
|
||||||||
Vascular and Interventional Radiology |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Rm S-072B, Stanford, CA 94305-5105. From the 1997 RSNA scientific assembly. Received December 16, 1998; revision requested February 11, 1999; final revision received August 3; accepted August 5. Address reprint requests to G.D.R. (e-mail: grubin@stanford.edu).
PURPOSE: To compare computed tomographic (CT) angiography and conventional angiography for determining the success of endoluminal stent-graft treatment of aortic aneurysms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients underwent conventional angiography and CT angiography following treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms with endoluminal stent-grafts. Six additional sets of conventional angiographicCT angiographic examinations were performed in five patients after placement of additional stent-grafts or coil embolization to treat perigraft leakage. Three faculty CT radiologists who were blinded to patient clinical data and outcome independently interpreted the CT angiograms, and three faculty angiographers, who were not involved in the stent-graft deployment, interpreted the conventional angiograms. Images were assessed for the presence of postdeployment complications. A reference standard was developed by experienced radiologists using all available images and clinical data. Sensitivities, specificities, and
values were calculated.
RESULTS: Perigraft leakage was the most commonly identified complication. Twenty perigraft leaks were detected in the results of 46 examinations. Sensitivities and specificities for detecting perigraft leakage were 63% and 77% for conventional angiography and 92% and 90% for CT angiography, respectively. The
value was 0.41 for conventional angiography and 0.81 for CT angiography.
CONCLUSION: CT angiography is the preferred method for establishing the presence of perigraft leakage following treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms with stent-grafts.
Index terms: Aneurysm, aortic, 94.73, 981.73 Aneurysm, CT, 94.12916, 981.12916 Angiography, comparative studies, 94.1211, 981.1211 Computed tomography (CT), angiography, 94.12916, 981.12916 Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies, 94.12916, 981.12916 Interventional procedures, complications, 94.458, 981.458 Stents and prostheses, 94.456, 981.456
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P Sharma and C Kyriakides Surveillance of patients post-endovascular aneurysm repair Postgrad. Med. J., December 1, 2007; 83(986): 750 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Burrill, Z. Dabbagh, F. Gollub, and M. Hamady Multidetector computed tomographic angiography of the cardiovascular system Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2007; 83(985): 698 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Stavropoulos and S. R. Charagundla Imaging Techniques for Detection and Management of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 641 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Chernyak, A. M. Rozenblit, M. Patlas, J. Cynamon, Z. J. Ricci, M. P. Laks, and F. J. Veith Type II Endoleak after Endoaortic Graft Implantation: Diagnosis with Helical CT Arteriography Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 885 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kubo, E. Tadamura, M. Yamamuro, R. Hosokawa, T. Kimura, T. Kita, M. Komeda, and K. Togashi Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac MDCT angiography using reduced dose of contrast material. Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 548 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Tolia, R. Landis, P. Lamparello, R. Rosen, and M. Macari Type II Endoleaks after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Natural History Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 683 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Ho, R. C. Nelson, J. Thomas, E. I. Gimenez, and D. M. DeLong Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms at Multi-Detector Row Helical CT: Optimization with Interactive Determination of Scanning Delay and Contrast Medium Dose Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 854 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Olin, J. A. Kaufman, D. A. Bluemke, R. O. Bonow, M. D. Gerhard, M. R. Jaff, G. D. Rubin, and W. Hall Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group IV: Imaging Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2626 - 2633. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Greenfield, E. J. Halpern, J. Bonn, R. J. Wechsler, and M. B. Kahn Application of Duplex US for Characterization of Endoleaks in Abdominal Aortic Stent-Grafts: Report of Five Cases Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 845 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Bosch, J. A. Kaufman, M. T. Beinfeld, M. E. A. P. M. Adriaensen, D. C. Brewster, and G. S. Gazelle Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Cost-effectiveness of Elective Endovascular and Open Surgical Repair Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 337 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Rubin, A. J. Schmidt, L. J. Logan, and M. C. Sofilos Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography of Lower Extremity Arterial Inflow and Runoff: Initial Experience Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 146 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Macari, G. M. Israel, P. Berman, M. Lisi, A. J. Tolia, M. Adelman, and A. J. Megibow Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms at Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography: Intravascular Enhancement without a Timing Acquisition Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 519 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Rubin, M. C. Shiau, A. N. Leung, S. T. Kee, L. J. Logan, and M. C. Sofilos Aorta and Iliac Arteries: Single versus Multiple Detector-Row Helical CT Angiography Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 670 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |