Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armerding, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dake, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armerding, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dake, M. D.
(Radiology. 2000;215:138-146.)
© RSNA, 2000


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Aortic Aneurysmal Disease: Assessment of Stent-Graft Treatment-CT versus Conventional Angiography1

Mark D. Armerding, MD 2, Geoffrey D. Rubin, MD, Christopher F. Beaulieu, MD, PhD, Suzanne M. Slonim, MD, Eric W. Olcott, MD, Shaun L. Samuels, MD, Mark J. Jorgensen, MD, Charles P. Semba, MD, R. Brooke Jeffrey, Jr, MD and Michael D. Dake, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Rm S-072B, Stanford, CA 94305-5105. From the 1997 RSNA scientific assembly. Received December 16, 1998; revision requested February 11, 1999; final revision received August 3; accepted August 5. Address reprint requests to G.D.R. (e-mail: grubin@stanford.edu).

PURPOSE: To compare computed tomographic (CT) angiography and conventional angiography for determining the success of endoluminal stent-graft treatment of aortic aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients underwent conventional angiography and CT angiography following treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms with endoluminal stent-grafts. Six additional sets of conventional angiographic–CT angiographic examinations were performed in five patients after placement of additional stent-grafts or coil embolization to treat perigraft leakage. Three faculty CT radiologists who were blinded to patient clinical data and outcome independently interpreted the CT angiograms, and three faculty angiographers, who were not involved in the stent-graft deployment, interpreted the conventional angiograms. Images were assessed for the presence of postdeployment complications. A reference standard was developed by experienced radiologists using all available images and clinical data. Sensitivities, specificities, and {kappa} values were calculated.

RESULTS: Perigraft leakage was the most commonly identified complication. Twenty perigraft leaks were detected in the results of 46 examinations. Sensitivities and specificities for detecting perigraft leakage were 63% and 77% for conventional angiography and 92% and 90% for CT angiography, respectively. The {kappa} value was 0.41 for conventional angiography and 0.81 for CT angiography.

CONCLUSION: CT angiography is the preferred method for establishing the presence of perigraft leakage following treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms with stent-grafts.

Index terms: Aneurysm, aortic, 94.73, 981.73 • Aneurysm, CT, 94.12916, 981.12916 • Angiography, comparative studies, 94.1211, 981.1211 • Computed tomography (CT), angiography, 94.12916, 981.12916 • Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies, 94.12916, 981.12916 • Interventional procedures, complications, 94.458, 981.458 • Stents and prostheses, 94.456, 981.456




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
P Sharma and C Kyriakides
Surveillance of patients post-endovascular aneurysm repair
Postgrad. Med. J., December 1, 2007; 83(986): 750 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
J. Burrill, Z. Dabbagh, F. Gollub, and M. Hamady
Multidetector computed tomographic angiography of the cardiovascular system
Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2007; 83(985): 698 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. W. Stavropoulos and S. R. Charagundla
Imaging Techniques for Detection and Management of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 641 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Chernyak, A. M. Rozenblit, M. Patlas, J. Cynamon, Z. J. Ricci, M. P. Laks, and F. J. Veith
Type II Endoleak after Endoaortic Graft Implantation: Diagnosis with Helical CT Arteriography
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 885 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Kubo, E. Tadamura, M. Yamamuro, R. Hosokawa, T. Kimura, T. Kita, M. Komeda, and K. Togashi
Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac MDCT angiography using reduced dose of contrast material.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 548 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. J. Tolia, R. Landis, P. Lamparello, R. Rosen, and M. Macari
Type II Endoleaks after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Natural History
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 683 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. M. Ho, R. C. Nelson, J. Thomas, E. I. Gimenez, and D. M. DeLong
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms at Multi-Detector Row Helical CT: Optimization with Interactive Determination of Scanning Delay and Contrast Medium Dose
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 854 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. W. Olin, J. A. Kaufman, D. A. Bluemke, R. O. Bonow, M. D. Gerhard, M. R. Jaff, G. D. Rubin, and W. Hall
Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group IV: Imaging
Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2626 - 2633.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. L. Greenfield, E. J. Halpern, J. Bonn, R. J. Wechsler, and M. B. Kahn
Application of Duplex US for Characterization of Endoleaks in Abdominal Aortic Stent-Grafts: Report of Five Cases
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 845 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. L. Bosch, J. A. Kaufman, M. T. Beinfeld, M. E. A. P. M. Adriaensen, D. C. Brewster, and G. S. Gazelle
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Cost-effectiveness of Elective Endovascular and Open Surgical Repair
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 337 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. D. Rubin, A. J. Schmidt, L. J. Logan, and M. C. Sofilos
Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography of Lower Extremity Arterial Inflow and Runoff: Initial Experience
Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 146 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Macari, G. M. Israel, P. Berman, M. Lisi, A. J. Tolia, M. Adelman, and A. J. Megibow
Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms at Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography: Intravascular Enhancement without a Timing Acquisition
Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 519 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. D. Rubin, M. C. Shiau, A. N. Leung, S. T. Kee, L. J. Logan, and M. C. Sofilos
Aorta and Iliac Arteries: Single versus Multiple Detector-Row Helical CT Angiography
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 670 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.