| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Musculoskeletal Imaging |
1 From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland (D.W., M.R.S., B.R.); the Departments of Radiology (M.Z., J.H.), Orthopedic Surgery (N.B.), and Rheumatology (R.O.K.), Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland; and the Spine Unit, Schulthess Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland (J.D.). Received January 4, 1999; revision requested February 18; final revision received July 1; accepted August 25. Address reprint requests to J.H. (e-mail: jhodler@balgrist.unizh.ch).
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether positional magnetic resonance (MR) images of the lumbar spine demonstrate nerve root compromise not visible on MR images obtained with the patient in a supine position (conventional MR images).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with chronic low back pain unresponsive to nonsurgical treatment and with disk abnormalities but without compression of neural structures were included. Positional MR images were obtained by using an open-configuration, 0.5-T MR imager with the patients seated and with flexion and extension of their backs. The disk and nerve root were related to the body position. Nerve root compression and foraminal size were correlated with the patient's symptoms, as assessed with a visual analogue scale.
RESULTS: Nerve root contact without deviation was present in 34 of 152 instances in the supine position, in 62 instances in the seated flexion position, and in 45 instances in the seated extension position. As compared with the supine position, in the seated flexion position nerve root deviation decreased from 10 to eight instances; in the seated extension position, it increased from 10 to 13 instances. Nerve root compression was seen in one patient in the seated extension position. Positional pain score differences were significantly related to changes in foraminal size (P = .046) but not to differences in nerve root compromise.
CONCLUSION: Positional MR imaging more frequently demonstrates minor neural compromise than does conventional MR imaging. Positional pain differences are related to position-dependent changes in foraminal size.
Index terms: Nerves, abnormalities, 33.42 • Nerves, MR, 33.121411 • Nerves, roots, 33.42 • Nerves, spinal, 33.42 • Spine, abnormalities, 33.771, 33.783 • Spine, intervertebral disks, 33.783 • Spine, MR, 33.121411
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. A. Mont, G. A. Marulanda, L. C. Jones, K. J. Saleh, N. Gordon, D. S. Hungerford, and M. E. Steinberg Systematic Analysis of Classification Systems for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2006; 88(suppl_3): 16 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Novy, A. Carruzzo, P. Maeder, and J. Bogousslavsky Spinal Cord Ischemia: Clinical and Imaging Patterns, Pathogenesis, and Outcomes in 27 Patients. Arch Neurol, August 1, 2006; 63(8): 1113 - 1120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S Ostlere and M Javid Radiculopathy Imaging, December 1, 2005; 17(3): 208 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Hiwatashi, B. Danielson, T. Moritani, R. S. Bakos, T. G. Rodenhause, W. H. Pilcher, and P.-L. Westesson Axial Loading during MR Imaging Can Influence Treatment Decision for Symptomatic Spinal Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2004; 25(2): 170 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Love, A. S. Din, M. B. Tomas, T. P. Kalapparambath, and C. J. Palestro Radionuclide Bone Imaging: An Illustrative Review RadioGraphics, March 1, 2003; 23(2): 341 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A J P Goddard and A Gholkar Diagnostic and therapeutic radiology of the spine: an overview Imaging, October 1, 2002; 14(5): 355 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
