Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kliewer, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by DeLong, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kliewer, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by DeLong, D. M.
(Radiology. 2000;215:453-457.)
© RSNA, 2000


Obstetric Imaging

Normal Fetal Pelvis: Important Factors for Morphometric Characterization with US1

Mark A. Kliewer, MD, Barbara S. Hertzberg, MD, Kelly S. Freed, MD, Patricia J. McNally, RDMS and David M. DeLong, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Rm 2526, Blue Zone, South, Durham, NC 27710. Received February 15, 1999; revision requested April 5; revision received August 26; accepted August 30. Address correspondence to M.A.K.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate iliac angle and iliac length in a large number of normal fetuses and to identify factors that may influence these measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: At antenatal ultrasonography (US) in 356 fetuses, the iliac angle and iliac length were measured at two axial levels (superior and inferior). In mixed linear models, the statistical significance and magnitude of effect on the measurement of iliac angle and iliac length were estimated for gestational age, fetal sex, maternal diabetes status, axial level, and spine position relative to the transducer.

RESULTS: Statistically significant effects were found for gestational age, axial level, and spine orientation but not for fetal sex or maternal diabetes status. The iliac angle was found to decrease by 15.7° from the superior to inferior portion of the pelvis, decrease by approximately 0.37°/wk, and decrease by as much as 15.6° when the spine is directed to the side. Iliac length was found to increase by 0.8 mm/wk from 13 weeks to term, decrease by 1.2 mm from the superior to the inferior portion of the pelvis, and increase by as much as 1.29 mm when the spine is not directly subjacent to the transducer.

CONCLUSION: The axial level of measurement, gestational age, and spine orientation must be accounted for if these morphometric indexes are used to discriminate fetuses with and those without Down syndrome.

Index terms: Down syndrome, 856.1298, 856.873 • Fetus, abnormalities, 856.873 • Fetus, skeletal system, 856.873 • Fetus, US, 85.1298 • Pelvis, measurement, 44.1298, 856.873




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. A. Kliewer, B. S. Hertzberg, K. S. Freed, P. J. McNally, and D. M. DeLong
The Anterior Iliac Separation: Alternative Index for Pelvic Morphometry in Fetuses with Down Syndrome
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2001; 176(4): 1003 - 1007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.