Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atri, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bret, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atri, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bret, P. M.
(Radiology. 2000;215:783-790.)
© RSNA, 2000


Ultrasonography

Adenomyosis: US Features with Histologic Correlation in an in Vitro Study1

Mostafa Atri, MD, FRCPC, Caroline Reinhold, MD, FRCPC, Amira R. Mehio, MD, William B. Chapman, MD, FRCPC and Patrice M. Bret, MD, FRCPC

1 From the Departments of Radiology (M.A., C.R., P.M.B.) and Pathology (A.R.M.), McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Quebec, Canada; and the Departments of Pathology (W.B.C.) and Medical Imaging (M.A., P.M.B.), University of Toronto, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9. From the 1997 RSNA scientific assembly. Received July 16, 1999; revision requested August 25; revision received October 19; accepted October 26. Address correspondence to M.A. (e-mail: mostafa_atri@pmh.toronto.on.ca).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonographic (US) features of adenomyosis by correlating them with histologic findings and to assess inter- and intraobserver agreement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: US was performed and videotaped in 102 consecutive hysterectomy specimens in a water bath. Videotapes were reviewed initially by two independent radiologists blinded to the clinical and histologic findings and after 1 month by one of the two; US and histologic findings were correlated. Features evaluated included diffuse abnormal echotexture of myometrium, subendometrial myometrial cysts, subendometrial echogenic nodules, subendometrial echogenic linear striations, nodular endometrial-myometrial junction, poor definition of the endometrial-myometrial junction, asymmetric thickness of the anteroposterior wall of the myometrium, and globular configuration.

RESULTS: The prevalence of adenomyosis in this cohort was 29.4% (30 of 102 specimens). The mean sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy for the diagnosis of adenomyosis for the three reviews were 81%, 71%, 90%, 54%, and 74%, respectively. All findings evaluated, except for nodular endometrial-myometrial junction, were significantly more common in uteri with adenomyosis (P < .05). Heterogeneous myometrium reached borderline significance (P = .05). The specificities and PPVs of subendometrial striations, subendometrial echogenic nodules, and asymmetric myometrial thickness were significantly higher than those of other features (P < .05). The interobserver agreement was moderate ({kappa} = 0.48), and the intraobserver agreement was good ({kappa} = 0.67) for the three reviews.

CONCLUSION: The presence of subendometrial linear striations, subendometrial echogenic nodules, or asymmetric myometrial thickness improves the specificity and PPV of US in diagnosing adenomyosis.

Index terms: Endometriosis, 854,3192 • Ultrasound (US), tissue characterization, 854.317, 854.3192 • Uterine neoplasms, diagnosis, 854.12981, 854.317, 854.3192 • Uterine neoplasms, US, 854.12981, 854.317, 854.3192 • Uterus, endometrium, 854.317, 854.3192 • Uterus, myometrium, 854.317, 854.3192 • Uterus, US, 854.12981, 854.317, 854.3192




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.-J. Jeng, S.-H. Huang, J. Shen, C.-S. Chou, and C.-R. Tzeng
Laparoscopy-guided myometrial biopsy in the definite diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 2016 - 2019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Chopra, A. S. Lev-Toaff, F. Ors, and D. Bergin
Adenomyosis:common and uncommon manifestations on sonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2006; 25(5): 617 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Ghai, D. K. Rajan, M. S. Benjamin, M. R. Asch, and S. Ghai
Uterine Artery Embolization for Leiomyomas: Pre- and Postprocedural Evaluation with US
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1159 - 1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. Kuligowska, L. Deeds III, and K. Lu III
Pelvic Pain: Overlooked and Underdiagnosed Gynecologic Conditions
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 3 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. Fong, P. Causer, M. Atri, A. Lytwyn, and R. Kung
Transvaginal US and Hysterosonography in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer Receiving Tamoxifen: Correlation with Hysteroscopy and Pathologic Study
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2003; 23(1): 137 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bazot, A. Cortez, E. Darai, J. Rouger, J. Chopier, J.-M. Antoine, and S. Uzan
Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2427 - 2433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.-B. Dubuisson, A. Fauconnier, V. Fourchotte, K. Babaki-Fard, J. Coste, and C. Chapron
Laparoscopic myomectomy: predicting the risk of conversion to an open procedure
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1726 - 1731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.